I assume these print statements(in *gluon/sqlhtml.py*), probably added
while debugging, will be removed in the 2.14.1?
print dbset.query
print tablenames
print tables
Thanks
On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 6:38:16 PM UTC-4, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> Please help
+1 Would love to give it a try. Thanks!
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
, Jack Kuan wrote:
Often the starting point of making a web2py app is to copy the welcome app
and base your repo on it.
But as you add/modify/delete files from your repo that's based on the
welcome app to suit your need, you then face the problem of
merging updates to the welcome app back
surely you meant 2.12.1 ?
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Often the starting point of making a web2py app is to copy the welcome app
and base your repo on it.
But as you add/modify/delete files from your repo that's based on the
welcome app to suit your need, you then face the problem of
merging updates to the welcome app back to your repo.
I did
I too have a feeling that all my posts have been moderated because whenever I
make a new post, I have to wait for hours or a day for it to show up in the
group.
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
-
I don't see the need and think it can be off putting for new comers.
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
---
You received this message because
I have had a similar problem with the scheduler on OS X. Try search scheduler
os x urllib in this group, and see if my post helps.
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
-
not use
urllib to begin with. Too bad, I thought I'd found a workaround! Now I'll
have to do some heavy lifting and help Niphlod find the problem...
-- Joe
On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 6:12:30 PM UTC-8, Jack Kuan wrote:
I have had a similar problem with the scheduler on OS X. Try search
Hi,
I'm just wondering if anyone has experienced the same problem or not.
Basically, I get a segmentation fault (scheduler process killed by signal
11) if I try to start more than one scheduler under OS X.
The problem can be reproduced with the built-in welcome app by adding a
Answering my own question: my solution is to massage the returned grid object,
removing duplicate options and other unwanted html elements.
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
-
Hi,
I'm using left=[...] when creating a searchable SQLFORM.grid.
My problem is that the drop-down menu for choosing which fields to build
the search query contains ALL the fields in the search result.
Is there a way to limit it to only a subset of the fields like what the
'fields' argument of
How does one usually deal with such conflict? (two identical(except for
id's) inserts causing a violation of an unique constraint)
Isolating the insert into its own transaction and then do a db.commit(),
catch any exception and then ignore?
Thanks
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 10:57:13 AM
Hi,
just starting out with web2py. Given a table with record versioning
enabled, I find that for every successful update operation a row will be
inserted in the archive table.
I'm using update_or_insert(), is it possible to make web2py only copy an
old row into the archive table when there's a
Hi,
When using update_or_insert(), say for example:
db.mytable.update_or_insert(q, name='test')
Let's say the query, q, results in not finding any row in mytable, is it
possible that in another transaction in another request that when the same
update_or_insert(...) is called that it also
15 matches
Mail list logo
