[web2py] Re: web2py hosting - least intervention required

2010-05-26 Thread greenpoise
Thanks for all the replies. Is there a list of GAE limitations? Thanks On May 26, 1:35 am, Richard richar...@gmail.com wrote: I currently use Webfaction, Slicehost, and Google App Engine. Webfaction is cheap and relatively easy, but slow lately. Good support in forums from admins.

[web2py] Re: web2py hosting - least intervention required

2010-05-25 Thread Richard
I currently use Webfaction, Slicehost, and Google App Engine. Webfaction is cheap and relatively easy, but slow lately. Good support in forums from admins. Slicehost is FAST, but you have to do everything yourself. Haven't used their support yet. GAE is the easiest to deploy with because no

[web2py] Re: web2py hosting - least intervention required

2010-05-24 Thread mdipierro
I use vps.net and I am very happy with it. On May 24, 7:10 pm, greenpoise danel.sega...@gmail.com wrote: I am looking for web2py hosting. I have seen most posts of webfaction. I just want to make sure that what I pick requires the least of my intervention to get it going. Leads? THanks in

[web2py] Re: web2py hosting - least intervention required

2010-05-24 Thread Yarko Tymciurak
webfaction - shared hosting - means all you need to worry about is your application. If your traffic is realtively low, this is really easy. VPS is cloud hosting, so not sure what the setup is - but you can probably expect to be root on your own linux slice. Massimo will be able to say if he had

[web2py] Re: web2py hosting - least intervention required

2010-05-24 Thread mdipierro
VPS just gives you a Virtual Private Server for $25/month (including daily, weakly and monthly backups). You can install one of the many images they provide (like Ubuntu or any of the TurnKeyLinux appliances). On Ubuntu installing and configuring a full apache/ postresql/postfix/web2py just