Re: [web2py] web3py again....

2019-03-31 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
Nope! If that is what you do, just use bottle. The whole point of web2py (which I am trying to preserve in web3py) is that the framework can run whether or not you have an application and multiple applications can be installed in a plug-and-play fashion. This means it is not logically possible

[web2py] web3py again....

2019-03-31 Thread Christopher Smiga
Hi Massimo and Team, It's been a several years since contributing to the project, and I'm interested in web3py for several reasons such as * it is a fresh project * speed * architecture improvements * the future of web2py In this effort, are pyunit (TDD), Python Behave Library

Re: [web2py] web3py again....

2019-03-30 Thread Carlos Cesar Caballero Díaz
So far looks good, but I would prefer that the application include (or import) the framework instead of the framework include the application. With the first one, pip based deployments and CI/CD will be a lot easier. I have being playing with bottle a lot recently, so if there is some web3py

Re: [web2py] web3py again....

2019-03-28 Thread 黄祥
interested in github readme : - it is not as good as web2py yet, but it is 10-20x faster perhaps could you share which benchmark method or tools to get this conclusion (compare with similar web2py todo apps) ? best regards, stifan -- Resources: - http://web2py.com -

Re: [web2py] web3py again....

2019-03-28 Thread junderhill
For authentication, Okta, Azure AD B2C, etc. are options that offload a lot of trouble, but I like having a fully-functional Auth built-in and we do use it in some projects. It needs full OIDC support. YMMV. We build scalable back ends with Web2py using Postgres and Nginx. John On

Re: [web2py] web3py again....

2019-03-28 Thread Marcelo Huerta
El jueves, 28 de marzo de 2019, 6:57:08 (UTC-3), José L. escribió: > > >- sqlform and grid are one of the key points for web2py. It's one of >the main reasons to use it instead of other frameworks as development is >really quick. However I think nowadays a backport from web2py is not

Re: [web2py] web3py again....

2019-03-28 Thread José Luis Redrejo
Just tested, some considerations: 1. Tested with Python 3.6, followig strictly the provided instructions, several things don't work: a) static folder is not working properly. I get a 404 error for all the requests 127.0.0.1 - - [28/Mar/2019 10:45:10] "GET /todo/index HTTP/1.1" 200 828 127.0.0.1 -

[web2py] web3py again....

2019-03-28 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
I know this comes up once in a while but ... https://github.com/web2py/web3py what do you think? It is very preliminary but I will have an admin soon. Backporting SQLFORM, grid and Auth, should not be that complicated, although I think we can do better. Massimo -- Resources: -