I should note, I don't think this is possible for JS objects, it certainly
would not be possible for arbitrary WebCore/WebKit objects. I noticed the
patch was re-landed, which surprises me since we are still discussing it,
why was this?
-Sam
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Timothy Hatcher wrote
On Jun 3, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
>1) There’s one directory with a pristine copy of the W3C test suite, with
> no WebKit changes.
>2) If there are some tests that need to be fixed, fixed copies of those
> individual tests
Even if that wont prevent Sam's proposed information leak, I think this would
be good to do. That way developers only see what they are affecting. Otherwise
a developer might chase a red herring if they have Gmail or something open in
the background and keep seeing spikes of memory are not caus
When there are only a couple tests that need new expectations, you can get
away with committing your patch with the expectations for the platforms you
have access to and then immediately grabbing the new expectations off the
buildbots.
There is currently no good way to address the cases where your
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Mikhail Naganov wrote:
> Used memory count can be restricted to include only objects reachable
> from the caller execution context. In this case, an app could only see
> the amount of memory consumed by itself, not by the whole engine.
>
I don't think this would ch
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
>
>1) There’s one directory with a pristine copy of the W3C test suite,
> with no WebKit changes.
>2) If there are some tests that need to be fixed, fixed copies of those
> individual tests would go into another directory.
>
So we would k
David's right, Mozilla has it.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/link_prefetching_faq
They support it for rel=next and rel=prefetch. Unfortunate, as I also think
rel=subresource matters, and should be distinguished from prefetch for
prioritization.
- Gavin
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:15 PM, David
On Jun 2, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Gavin Peters (蓋文彼德斯) wrote:
> I don't think I'll share much code .
Try to share as much code as you can, assuming it makes sense to do so. We
could always refactor common code into something like a CSSStyleSheetLoader
class if we needed to.
dave
(hy...@app
Really? I thought they did, at least for stylesheets.
dave
On Jun 3, 2010, at 8:14 AM, Gavin Peters (蓋文彼德斯) wrote:
> No, no other browsers support it. There's a similar feature in Mozilla, the
> LINK rel=prefetch item, but to my knowledge, Mozilla does not support the
> Link header.
>
> On W
Hi Darin - I have a tiny CL related to this, sitting around for a couple of
days now - https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40036. Would you be able
to review it?
Thanks,
Prasad
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Prasad Tammana wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
>
Does webcore have a 'protocol handler' abstraction that can be leveraged to
add support for a new protocol scheme? I don't think it does, but an
abstraction like that may help with this.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Jian Li wrote:
> This will probably work for most of the platforms, except t
Also, I was simply pointing out existing behavior, not arguing for/against the
zip file format.
Dave
From: Sam Weinig
To: David Kilzer
Cc: John Gregg ; webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org; Adele
Peterson
Sent: Wed, June 2, 2010 11:28:11 AM
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev
Hi,
I wrote a blog post about this some time ago while trying to understand the
same thing. Maybe it will help you,
http://uselessbyte.blogspot.com/2009/12/adding-custom-javascript-bindings-to.html
Btw, I think this question belongs to webkit-help not webkit-dev.
Niklas
On 3 jun 2010, at 14.56
No, no other browsers support it. There's a similar feature in Mozilla, the
LINK rel=prefetch item, but to my knowledge, Mozilla does not support the
Link header.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Gavin Peters (蓋文彼德斯)
> wrote:
>
>> I'm start
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2010, at 5:14 PM, Jian Li wrote:
>
> I am working on Blob.url support as defined in the latest version of File
> API (http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/). The Blob.url will return a
> URL that can be used to refer to the blob obje
Hi,
I am trying to extend javascript to invoke custom C /C++ code in webkit. I
would like to make a glue between C/C++ code and javascript functions via
webkit.
I think that it's possible with JavaScriptCore API's, but I dont know how.
Any suggestions are welcome.
regards,
Wadii
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
> On May 25, 2010, at 7:54 AM, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
>
>> I sometimes come across public member functions whose implementations do not
>> depend on private data.
>>
>> There is a school of thought that such functions are better non-member
>> b
17 matches
Mail list logo
