On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Roland Steiner rolandstei...@google.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.orgwrote:
Yeah. You're right. We should get Hixie to change the spec. I don't
think we should implement currently spec'd behavior or change the
Hi all,
pageScaleFactor is a document level CSS scaling style. Often times, we'd
like to be able to apply style at the document level when writing layout
tests. As far as I'm aware, there's no way to do this in javascript in a
layout test? Is this correct? If so, would anyone object to exposing
On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Fady Samuel wrote:
pageScaleFactor is a document level CSS scaling style. Often times, we'd like
to be able to apply style at the document level when writing layout tests. As
far as I'm aware, there's no way to do this in javascript in a layout test?
Is this
On Sep 29, 2011, at 8:41 AM, Adam Roben wrote:
On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Fady Samuel wrote:
pageScaleFactor is a document level CSS scaling style. Often times, we'd
like to be able to apply style at the document level when writing layout
tests. As far as I'm aware, there's no way to
All of this discussion started with my wanting to write a layout test that
changes pageScaleFactor, without incurring scroll bars in the process. The
documentElement.style method below seems to be able to change, for example,
background colour, but it doesn't seem to work for
Dear WebKittens,
I'd like to add some compile-time assertions for the sizes of various
objects. The motivation comes a patch fixing bloat in InlineBox[1].
There are two major problems with this:
1. The sizes will differ on 32- and 64-bit platforms.
2. The sizes will differ based on compiler
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Simon Fraser simon.fra...@apple.comwrote:
On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Andreas Kling wrote:
Dear WebKittens,
I'd like to add some compile-time assertions for the sizes of various
objects. The motivation comes a patch fixing bloat in InlineBox[1].
On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Andreas Kling wrote:
Dear WebKittens,
I'd like to add some compile-time assertions for the sizes of various
objects. The motivation comes a patch fixing bloat in InlineBox[1].
There are two major problems with this:
1. The sizes will differ on 32- and
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Simon Fraser simon.fra...@apple.comwrote:
On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Andreas Kling wrote:
Dear WebKittens,
I'd like to add some compile-time assertions for the sizes of various
objects. The motivation comes a patch fixing bloat in InlineBox[1].
On Sep 29, 2011, at 1:40 PM, Andreas Kling wrote:
Good idea in general, though it doesn't work for InlineBox since its bits are
spread across public, protected and private.
I'm not sure it's worth losing those classifications for the sake of the
anti-bloat mechanism.
We wouldn’t have to
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 29, 2011, at 1:40 PM, Andreas Kling wrote:
Good idea in general, though it doesn't work for InlineBox since its bits
are spread across public, protected and private.
I'm not sure it's worth losing those
On Sep 29, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Andreas Kling wrote:
Right, but those keywords would pertain to the struct containing the
bitfields, not InlineBox itself. Or maybe I'm misunderstanding you?
Yes, I was wrong, you are right.
I had lost the thread. I’m not sure we need to group bit fields in a
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Andreas Kling kl...@webkit.org wrote:
One idea is to add a file that would only be built on (for example) 64-bit
Mac and then at least that bot would break if an object changes size. That's
obviously not ideal though.
I like that approach as it allows you to
HIApologies in advance for this newbie question.I started to have a deeper look into WebKit code for some bugs I would like to fix . In order to grasp the develop/compile/debug cycle for webkit, I did follow the instructions athttps://ebkit.org/building/debug.htmlHowever it looks like Xcode
I know some people have been building WebKit with the 4.1 IDE, but
after a cursory attempt I was only able to build from the command
line. I'd also love tips from those more familiar with it :)
-Levi
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:04 PM, lcerveau lcerv...@me.com wrote:
HI
Apologies in advance for
15 matches
Mail list logo
