On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Pavel Feldman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>> In connection with the thread on webkitPostMessage, I took a look at
>> what sorts of metrics we have currently for depreciated features. We
>> have high quality data for two groups of
>
>
> By the way, in preparing the patch, I noticed that webkitSlice was
> used by the web inspector. Note that the data above includes the use
> by the web inspector.
>
>
The usage was in the heap profiler's load snapshot routines, so I can
imagine it not being invoked a lot. That matches the sta
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> In connection with the thread on webkitPostMessage, I took a look at
> what sorts of metrics we have currently for depreciated features. We
> have high quality data for two groups of APIs:
>
> For mutation events, we measure what percent of Do
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On Sep 13, 2012, at 11:15 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>> > Another metric we have is for Blob.webkitSlice:
>> >
>> > Ratio of Blob.w
Congrats Yuta.
-Original Message-
From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org
[mailto:webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of TAMURA, Kent
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 11:57 AM
To: WebKit Development
Subject: [webkit-dev] New WebKit reviewer: Yuta Kitamura
I'd like to announc
Wow, congratulation Yuta :-)
Gyuyoung
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> Congrats Yuta!!
>
> Adam
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:56 PM, TAMURA, Kent wrote:
> > I'd like to announce that Yuta Kitamura is now a
> > WebKit reviewer.
> >
> > He has contributed to WebKit project
On Sep 13, 2012, at 11:15 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> > Another metric we have is for Blob.webkitSlice:
> >
> > Ratio of Blob.webkitSlice calls to Blob.slice: 14.87%
> > Ratio of Blob.
Congrats Yuta!!
Adam
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:56 PM, TAMURA, Kent wrote:
> I'd like to announce that Yuta Kitamura is now a
> WebKit reviewer.
>
> He has contributed to WebKit project for three years mainly in WebSocket
> area. He is a trustworthy authority on WebSocket area. If you worked on
I'd like to announce that Yuta Kitamura is now a
WebKit reviewer.
He has contributed to WebKit project for three years mainly in WebSocket
area. He is a trustworthy authority on WebSocket area. If you worked on
WebSocket issues, please involve him.
--
TAMURA Kent
Software Engineer, Google
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> > Another metric we have is for Blob.webkitSlice:
> >
> > Ratio of Blob.webkitSlice calls to Blob.slice: 14.87%
> > Ratio of Blob.webkitSlice calls to Document creation: 0.0053%
> >
> > It's
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> Another metric we have is for Blob.webkitSlice:
>
> Ratio of Blob.webkitSlice calls to Blob.slice: 14.87%
> Ratio of Blob.webkitSlice calls to Document creation: 0.0053%
>
> It's difficult to know how to interpret this data because we don't
> ac
Hi,
Submitted the patch for enabling the MIPS slave in build.webkit.org.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96713
Who should I send the buildbot password for the slave?
Thanks,
Gergely
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Holger Freyther wrote:
> On 08/30/2012 12:10 AM, Gergely Kis wrote:
>
In connection with the thread on webkitPostMessage, I took a look at
what sorts of metrics we have currently for depreciated features. We
have high quality data for two groups of APIs:
For mutation events, we measure what percent of Documents have
listeners for various kinds of mutation events:
If someone wanted this and understood python, I suspect that they could
search for "unsigned" in that cpp.py and in about 10 min have a pretty good
idea of how to add such a check. If you don't understand Python, then 30
minutes :)
dave
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Filed https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96693
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> No. I think we can update webkitpy/style/checkers/cpp.py to do that.
> Unfortunately, I don't understand that code base.
>
> - Ryosuke
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Oliver Hunt wr
No. I think we can update webkitpy/style/checkers/cpp.py to do that.
Unfortunately, I don't understand that code base.
- Ryosuke
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
> Does the style bot pick up "unsigned int" etc?
>
> --Oliver
>
> On Sep 13, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote
Does the style bot pick up "unsigned int" etc?
--Oliver
On Sep 13, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> Landed in http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/128499 (Thanks ggaren!)
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> Uploaded a patch on https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Landed in http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/128499 (Thanks ggaren!)
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> Uploaded a patch on https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96682.
>
> - Ryosuke
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Dan Bernstein wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 13, 2012, at 1:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This discussion came out of https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96569.
>
> Should we allow URLs other than webkit.org/b/ to be used in
> TestExpectations?
>
> I vote for yes, and in fact, adding new URLs should be easy. What do yo
Hi,
This discussion came out of https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96569.
Should we allow URLs other than webkit.org/b/ to be used in
TestExpectations?
I vote for yes, and in fact, adding new URLs should be easy. What do you
guys think?
Best,
Ryosuke Niwa
Software Engineer
Google Inc.
Uploaded a patch on https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96682.
- Ryosuke
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Dan Bernstein wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 13, 2012, at 1:29 AM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <
> kenneth.christian...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I was telling people to use "unsign
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 12, 2012, at 10:36 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
> wrote:
> >>
> >> - Is this approach substantially less time and
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Sep 12, 2012, at 10:36 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>
>> - Is this approach substantially less time and effort than adding a
>> histogram-style metric? I expect you have adde
On Sep 13, 2012, at 1:29 AM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I was telling people to use "unsigned" instead of "unsigned int", as I
> have been told that was the preferred style before, but apparently
> that is not in the style guide.
>
> The question is, should it be?
Yes
Hi there,
I was telling people to use "unsigned" instead of "unsigned int", as I
have been told that was the preferred style before, but apparently
that is not in the style guide.
The question is, should it be?
A few greps in the code:
"unsigned" -> 18406 occurrences.
"unsigned int" -> 1721
"un
25 matches
Mail list logo
