From reading the bug report, I'm guessing you can fix the bug by simply
writing the correct text content to the clipboard. Just join the URLs with
\n's in between and write the resulting text to the clipboard in
BookmarkNodeData::WriteToClipboard().
Daniel
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Thia
Hi,
I already tried to contact tkent on #websocket with no answer from him. Alexey
commented on the bug entry I mentioned, that is good :-). Thanks for the answer.
On March 21, 2013 at 11:37 PM Takashi Toyoshima wrote:
>
> +a...@webkit.org [mailto:a...@webkit.org] , tk...@chromium.org
> [
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 21, 2013, at 5:38 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>>
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
>> On Mar 21, 2013, at 5:38 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On Mar 21, 2013, at 5:38 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>>>
>>
On Mar 21, 2013, at 5:38 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
> That's my platform
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>>
That's my platform, so I have to manage with it.
>>>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>
>>> That's my platform, so I have to manage with it.
>>>
>>
>> I do have a Retina MBP too but I don't use it to work on the r
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
>> That's my platform, so I have to manage with it.
>>
>
> I do have a Retina MBP too but I don't use it to work on the rendering
> engine precisely because of this issue. It's expected
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>>>
>>
>>
>>> In general, I don't recommend people running and re
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>>
>
>
>> In general, I don't recommend people running and relying on layout tests
>>> on Retina MBP especially if you work on th
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>>>
Lately, I've encountering changesets that only add lines t
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>>
>>> Lately, I've encountering changesets that only add lines to
>>> TestExpectations and then never baseline tests for any pla
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
>> Lately, I've encountering changesets that only add lines to
>> TestExpectations and then never baseline tests for any platform.
>>
>
> This (never rebaseline tests for any platform in
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> Lately, I've encountering changesets that only add lines to
> TestExpectations and then never baseline tests for any platform.
>
This (never rebaseline tests for any platform in that changeset) may not be
possible depending on circumstances
+a...@webkit.org, tk...@chromium.org
Hi Lamarque,
I think they can review WebSocket related changes.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Lamarque Souza wrote:
> **
> Hi all,
>
> I am starting to work on WebSocket development for WebKit and submitted a
> patch [1] for review some weeks ago. The thi
Thank you very much for making the uploads (and thus the flaky test
reporter) work again!
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
>>
>> I think to expect folks to use these results, we're going to need to
>> give them nice tools,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> I think to expect folks to use these results, we're going to need to
> give them nice tools, like:
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92033
I might work on that tonight if I decide to stay up 'til 4am again.
- R. Niwa
___
I think to expect folks to use these results, we're going to need to
give them nice tools, like:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92033
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> Fixed it in http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/146443.
>
> So yeah, don't add entries for rebaseline
Hi all,
I am starting to work on WebSocket development for WebKit and submitted a patch
[1] for review some weeks ago. The thing is that only one reviewer in [2] is
listed as working on WebSocket and he seems absent from WebKit development since
October of last year. I tried to contact him through
Lately, I've encountering changesets that only add lines to
TestExpectations and then never baseline tests for any platform.
This makes it impossible to figure out what the expected results is for
other platforms the patch author doesn't contribute to / care about.
Furthermore, I don't know how r
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Žan Doberšek wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Robert Hogan wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday, 21 March 2013, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Robert Hogan wrote:
> O
I wish I could explicitly set an entry as being intended to be rebaselined,
then notified (by email, by webkit-patch, something) when the tests covered
by that entry have ran through all the bots with a url that shows the
results so I can quickly validate them. In this magic world, if the results
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Žan Doberšek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Robert Hogan wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, 21 March 2013, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Robert Hogan wrote:
>>>
On Thursday, 21 March 2013, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> I used
Fixed it in http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/146443.
So yeah, don't add entries for rebaselines in platform/mac/TestExpectations
please.
- R. Niwa
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-d
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Robert Hogan wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, 21 March 2013, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Robert Hogan wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday, 21 March 2013, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>>>
I used to pull results from the bots where possible but creating
>>>
On Thursday, 21 March 2013, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Robert Hogan
>
> > wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, 21 March 2013, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>>
>>> I used to pull results from the bots where possible but creating
inconsistency between png/text results is not good.
Chromium is not interested in supporting APNG. I'm not opposed to landing
this patch if other ports are interested in supporting APNG.
Adam
On Mar 21, 2013 4:28 AM, "Allan Sandfeld Jensen" wrote:
> On Thursday 21 March 2013, Max Stepin wrote:
> > What do you think?
> >
> > I posted the patch h
On Thursday 21 March 2013, Max Stepin wrote:
> What do you think?
>
> I posted the patch here:
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17022
>
I don't mind. APNG is a nice simple format. GIF has limitations and MNG is
almost inherently broken. To support it though, you need to make sure the
p
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Robert Hogan wrote:
> On Thursday, 21 March 2013, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
>> I used to pull results from the bots where possible but creating
>>> inconsistency between png/text results is not good.
>>>
>>
>> It is unfortunate but it's much better than losing the com
On Thursday, 21 March 2013, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> I used to pull results from the bots where possible but creating
>> inconsistency between png/text results is not good.
>>
>
> It is unfortunate but it's much better than losing the complete test
> coverage.
>
If that's the case then I'm happy to
To give you a perspective on how bad the current system is, just while I
was removing those 30 entires, I've found out that
fast/css-generated-content/table-row-group-to-inline.html has regressed
since it was first added. This regression should have caught by people
running pixel tests only if we h
34 matches
Mail list logo
