On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:32 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Simon Fraser wrote:
>> I was under the impression that tests upstreamed from vendor repositories
>> would land in WPT tests
>> with minimal review, based on the fact that they had been reviewed when
>>
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Simon Fraser wrote:
> I was under the impression that tests upstreamed from vendor repositories
> would land in WPT tests
> with minimal review, based on the fact that they had been reviewed when
> landed in the vendor repo.
I think that's under the expectation
> On May 11, 2017, at 9:30 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:
>> I'm also concerned that with 4 vendors upstreaming their WPT tests, the WPT
>> repo will just become a morass of partially overlapping tests that takes 4x
>> longer to run than a cu
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:
> I'm also concerned that with 4 vendors upstreaming their WPT tests, the WPT
> repo will just become a morass of partially overlapping tests that takes 4x
> longer to run than a curated repo.
Why do you think WPT is not curated? It's an activel
Patch just landed.
Location is LayoutTests/http/wpt.
I also forgot to say that, should you want to write http served tests, it
might make sense to use this folder instead of http/tests.
Y
Le jeu. 11 mai 2017 à 19:05, Sam Weinig a écrit :
>
> On May 8, 2017, at 9:31 PM, youenn fablet wrote:
>
Are you intending to maintain this port going forward? The bar for
introducing a new port in the WebKit repository is pretty high due to
the maintenance cost it incurs to all other contributors. Unless
you're intending to maintain your own port, and then contribute to the
rest of the WebKit project
No.
The bar is much higher for introducing a new port to WebKit.
Geoff
> On May 11, 2017, at 7:54 PM, Daniel Ferreira (theiostream)
> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> My name is Daniel Ferreira and as a Google Summer of Code project I
> decided to tackle the ten-year-long[1] effort of porting WebKit
Hi there,
My name is Daniel Ferreira and as a Google Summer of Code project I
decided to tackle the ten-year-long[1] effort of porting WebKit to
GNUstep one more time (and hopefully get somewhere this time).
Since 2009, GNUstep has gained a lot of maturity in its graphics stack
and on its impleme
> On May 8, 2017, at 9:31 PM, youenn fablet wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Discussing with some WebKittens, testharness.js is more and more used in
> WebKit.
> Is it time to make testharness.js the recommended way of writing LayoutTests?
I am in favor of this. If we simplified the question to some f
Or, alternative way is casting the value to `unsigned long long` and always
using %llu for uint64_t.
uint64_t value = ...;
printf("%llu", (unsigned long long)value);
Regards,
Yusuke Suzuki
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is just a reminder to avoid a ca
11.05.2017, 11:18, "Osztrogonác Csaba" :
> Hi,
>
> On 2017.05.11. 0:32, Andy Estes wrote:
>>> On May 10, 2017, at 3:17 PM, Michael Catanzaro
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
One annoying thing is that I've seen clang complaining about that
re
Hi,
On 2017.05.11. 0:32, Andy Estes wrote:
On May 10, 2017, at 3:17 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
One annoying thing is that I've seen clang complaining about that
return statement being an unreachable statement while gcc doesn't :(.
So we p
12 matches
Mail list logo
