Patch just landed. Location is LayoutTests/http/wpt. I also forgot to say that, should you want to write http served tests, it might make sense to use this folder instead of http/tests. Y
Le jeu. 11 mai 2017 à 19:05, Sam Weinig <wei...@apple.com> a écrit : > > On May 8, 2017, at 9:31 PM, youenn fablet <youe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Discussing with some WebKittens, testharness.js is more and more used in > WebKit. > Is it time to make testharness.js the recommended way of writing > LayoutTests? > > > I am in favor of this. If we simplified the question to some form of, “do > we really need both testharness.js/testharnessreport.js and > js-test-pre.js/js-test-post.js?” > I am even more in favor, as having two test harnesses seems unnecessary, > cumbersome and unfriendly to new contributors, > > Do I think all tests should use testharness.js? No. Just as currently I > don’t think all tests should use testharness.js/testharnessreport.js. But > for many tests of new web platform features, it seems quite reasonable to > start using this harness, as the benefits, which include a good feature > set, easier interoperability with other browsers, and a reduced cost to > upstreaming to web-platform-tests, out weigh the costs, leaning something > new (there are probably other costs I am forgetting). > > > To continue moving forward, some of us are proposing to serve all tests in > LayoutTests/wpt through the WPT server [1]. > This would serve some purposes like increasing the use of WPT goodies: > file-specific headers, templated tests (*.any.js), IDLParser, server-side > scripts... > It could also ease test migration from WebKit to W3C WPT. > > > This seems uncontroversial and great to me (which would make sense since I > asked you if we could do it). It’s just a new directory, like > LayoutTests/http where we can put tests that use the WPT server. > > - Sam >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
