Re: [webkit-dev] Another WPT bite

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > > > On May 16, 2017, at 1:16 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Anne van Kesteren > wrote: > >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Ryosuke Niwa

Re: [webkit-dev] Another WPT bite

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 2:43 PM, youenn fablet wrote: > > Le ven. 12 mai 2017 à 11:07, Alexey Proskuryakov a écrit : > >> >> 9 мая 2017 г., в 11:27, Simon Fraser написал(а): >> >> >> Another consideration here is "would my test be

Re: [webkit-dev] Another WPT bite

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote: > > 9 мая 2017 г., в 11:27, Simon Fraser написал(а): > > Another consideration here is "would my test be useful for other browser > vendors". I don't think the answer is a unanimous "yes", so I

Re: [webkit-dev] Implementing Universal Second Factor (U2F)

com> wrote: > > On Feb 22, 2017, at 1:22 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Chrome ships with a built-in extension that exposes the high-level API >> (which I th

Re: [webkit-dev] Implementing Universal Second Factor (U2F)

Chrome ships with a built-in extension that exposes the high-level API (which I think we all agree is a hack). We recently had this discussion about the right path forward here, and agreed that we should instead

Re: [webkit-dev] PSA: higher precision event timestamp landing soon - port verification needed

There's been discussion / patches in the past for exposing system time as a separate timestamp on the Event object (as IE does). See https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2012-October/022574.html, https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94987 and

Re: [webkit-dev] PSA: higher precision event timestamp landing soon - port verification needed

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.orgwrote: On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Rick Byers rby...@chromium.org wrote: There's been discussion / patches in the past for exposing system time as a separate timestamp on the Event object (as IE does). See https

Re: [webkit-dev] Unprefixed and prefixed DOM events.

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Alexis Menard ale...@webkit.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Rick Byers rby...@chromium.org wrote: I've been wondering about the implications of prefixed events. Do we have other examples of events that had prefixed names and were later

Re: [webkit-dev] Unprefixed and prefixed DOM events.

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Alexis Menard ale...@webkit.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Rick Byers rby...@chromium.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Alexis Menard ale...@webkit.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Rick Byers rby...@chromium.org wrote

Re: [webkit-dev] Unprefixed and prefixed DOM events.

I've been wondering about the implications of prefixed events. Do we have other examples of events that had prefixed names and were later unprefixed? In particular, what are the composition implications of your solution? When you say depending if someone is listening to it or not you mean

Re: [webkit-dev] Possible device scale factor emulation approaches?

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Alexander Pavlov apav...@chromium.orgwrote: On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Alexander Pavlov apav...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Dana Jansens dan...@chromium.org

Re: [webkit-dev] Possible device scale factor emulation approaches?

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Alexander Pavlov apav...@chromium.orgwrote: On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Rick Byers rby...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Alexander Pavlov apav...@chromium.orgwrote: On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote

Re: [webkit-dev] pointer events specification - first editors draft

dropped over Thanksgiving. (Responses inline.) On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Rick Byers rby...@chromium.org wrote: Outside of the design details, are there any thoughts or concerns about WebKit getting

Re: [webkit-dev] pointer events specification - first editors draft

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Rick Byers rby...@chromium.org wrote: The premise of the specification is that using mouse event and touch events interchangeably is needed. In reality, nobody was really asking

[webkit-dev] pointer events specification - first editors draft

Hi, The W3C pointer events working group [1] has put out their first editors draft of the Pointer Events specification [2]. Pointer events offer a number of advantages over the current mouse event + touch event model in WebKit. In particular, having apps state clearly and declaratively [3]

[webkit-dev] Enabling support for high-dpi custom mouse cursors

One of the few places WebKit still doesn't support high-DPI images is custom 'cursor' CSS rules. I brought this up on www-style awhile back [1] and the consensus was that using image-set was the preferred mechanism. The CSS4 images draft spec now specifies that cursor can take any image [2],

[webkit-dev] Adding new CSS (pointer) and (hover) media features to WebCore

Hi Webkit-dev, I just wanted to let you know that I'm about to add initial support ( https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87403) for two new minor CSS media query features: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css4-mediaqueries/#pointer http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css4-mediaqueries/#hover Ports can opt into