This plan seems generally ok, a few comments:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Brett Wilson wrote:
I posted earlier about adding an ifdef for the Google-URL library in
KURL.h. I thought I would also explain the current thinking on the
long term plans, which a number of people have expressed
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also do not find the current interfaces of url_canon or url_parse
particularly congenial, so we should also keep an open mind on what the
interface to this code would look like. Is that ok with you?
Some background:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 5:28 PM, Brett Wilson wrote:
[moved from the beginning of the message]
I'd like to not assume up front that the code used to implement the
URL
parsing core will be Google-URL. Maybe Google-URL's code will turn
out to be
better, maybe the current KURL implementation
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sounds to me like you are saying that you would not be willing to
consider using the current KURL implementation in Chrome, even it
turns out to be materially better, and it gets exposed with a low-
level interface
On Oct 2, 2008, at 6:26 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It sounds to me like you are saying that you would not be willing to
consider using the current KURL implementation in Chrome, even it
turns out to be materially
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 6:26 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
The prospect of WTF types in general tends to make me leery, since using
one can bring in dependencies on others, and we wouldn't want to bring more
dependencies than
6 matches
Mail list logo
