This probably won't be a huge improvement given your numbers, but
platform/mac-tiger could be deleted at this point.
Regards,
Maciej
On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:33 PM, Brent Fulgham wrote:
As I sat tonight, waiting for my local repository to update (~1 hour and
counting at this point), I had a
These got general support, but no one actively interested in going through
our existing tests to see where they could be applied. Would you be
interested in helping organize such an effort? :)
Oh sure, Peter -- ruin my nice rant with the opportunity to DO something about
it!
I guess I've
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 20, 2011, at 10:41 PM, Andy Estes aes...@apple.com wrote:
In the case of updating, isn't it more interesting to look at which ports
update expectations more often?
You are right. That's the better question.
Presumably you paid the cost of the initial checkout
On Apr 21, 2011, at 2:41 AM, Brent Fulgham wrote:
I think it's just been especially bad the last few days.
I believe this is because Tony Chang has been working on converting existing
pixel results to have embedded checksums, rather than out-of-line .checksum
files. This is a one-time
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:32 PM, David Levin le...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Brent Fulgham bfulg...@gmail.comwrote:
These got general support, but no one actively interested in going
through our existing tests to see where they could be applied. Would you be
Hi Brent,
I think we should consider sharding the PNG's out into different archives.
I think another option would be to make a concerted effort to convert
some of these tests into reftests. It would be interesting for someone
to sample some of platform-specific tests and see how many could be
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Brent Fulgham bfulg...@gmail.com wrote:
My initial knee-jerk reaction was to blame this on the multitude of
Chromium layout archives (16 at last count). Clearly this is needless bloat
-- after all, what could possibly be the difference between
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 20, 2011, at 21:33, Brent Fulgham bfulg...@gmail.com wrote:
As I sat tonight, waiting for my local repository to update (~1 hour and
counting at this point), I had a bit of free time to contemplate the
ever-growing size of the platform results of the layout test
Hi Brent,
In a past thread, I noted that we could do a couple of things to reduce
platform-specific results, and the overall size of layout test results. In
order of increasing difficulty:
* Convert pixel tests to dumpAsText tests when pixel output is unnecessary
(merely requires adding a
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
* Convert pixel tests to dumpAsText tests when pixel output is unnecessary
(merely requires adding a command to the test file)
I actively work on this effort for LayoutTests/editing. I don't necessarily
spend all of
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Ryosuke Niwa ryosuke.n...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.comwrote:
* Convert tests to reftests
I don't think we should do this until all ports start using
new-run-webkit-tests on their bots.
It's the most
11 matches
Mail list logo
