On 06/04/2012 03:10 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org
mailto:aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org
mailto:rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Maciej
On Jun 3, 2012, at 6:10 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 3, 2012, at
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Sam Weinig wei...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 3, 2012, at 6:10 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012
On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Sam Weinig wei...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 3, 2012, at 6:10 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Are you referring to things like JSValueRef? If JS* functions are
supposed to be tested in DumpRenderTree, then that's a good argument
against this
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
We might also want to define the layoutTestController object with IDL
so we don't have to hand-write bindings every time we change it.
Using IDL for
Already done for the WebKit2 WebKitTestRunner. It should be straightforward to
adapt its IDL compiler.
- Maciej
On Jun 2, 2012, at 11:03 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
We might also want to define the layoutTestController object with IDL
so we don't have to hand-write bindings
I am on vacation so I won't be able to review your patch in detail, but from
your description it sounds less appealing to me than the WKTR approach. It
seems like bad layering to me to define the IDL interface in WebCore for
something actually implemented completely outside of WebCore. It also
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I am on vacation so I won't be able to review your patch in detail, but
from your description it sounds less appealing to me than the WKTR
approach. It seems like bad layering to me to define the IDL interface in
WebCore
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 3, 2012, at 8:05 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I am on vacation so I won't be able to review your patch in detail, but from
your description it sounds less appealing to me than the
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 3, 2012, at 8:05 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I am on vacation so I won't be able to review your patch in detail, but
from your
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 3, 2012, at 8:05 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I am on
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 3, 2012, at 8:05 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3,
Hi,
One thing that has annoyed me ever since I started working on WebKit is
that our test runner is called DumpRenderTree. We fixed this problem in
WebKit2 by renaming it to WebKitTestRunner but we've still got
DumpRenderTree in WebKit1 land.
Can we either rename DumpRenderTree to
We might also want to define the layoutTestController object with IDL
so we don't have to hand-write bindings every time we change it.
Using IDL for window.internals seems to have worked out well. It
would be nice to replicate that success with layoutTestController.
Adam
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
We might also want to define the layoutTestController object with IDL
so we don't have to hand-write bindings every time we change it.
Using IDL for window.internals seems to have worked out well. It
would be nice to
16 matches
Mail list logo
