I've posted this question to devforums.apple.com as well as to Stack
Overflow (go to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2557964/uiwebview-leak-can-someone-confirm
to see it) and have not gotten any answer, so now I'm reaching out
to webkit-dev for some help.
I am developing an iPhone
On Apr 20, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Thomas Hauk wrote:
I've posted this question to devforums.apple.com as well as to Stack Overflow
(go to
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2557964/uiwebview-leak-can-someone-confirm
to see it) and have not gotten any answer, so now I'm reaching out to
Hi Kevin,
WebKit approach is NOT to free memory before quit to make the quit process
as fast as possible. The memory manager should free the unfreed objects.
However, this approach makes really hard to find the real leaks (which
are unreferenced objects).
In my experince the unfreed (non-leak)
Some leak checkers are based on all objects being deleted at shutdown.
Those won’t work with WebKit. It doesn’t delete all objects at shutdown.
Other leak checkers are based on finding unreachable objects. Those
work well with WebKit.
-- Darin
Hi Zoltan,
On Sep 29, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Zoltan Herczeg wrote:
Hi Kevin,
WebKit approach is NOT to free memory before quit to make the quit
process
as fast as possible. The memory manager should free the unfreed
objects.
However, this approach makes really hard to find the real leaks
On 2009-09-01, at 04:26, Eric Seidel wrote:
It seems we have a leak bot again! Thanks to all who made that
possible!
There seem to be a bunch of leaks though. They all seem CFNetwork
related:
http://build.webkit.org/results/SnowLeopard%20Intel%20Leaks/r47923%20(318)/
I'm not sure if
Hello,
I seen in Changeset 3810, you force a leak, it's the same thing for the cache
and others parts in webCore, I would understand why you want leak some part of
code ?
regards,
--
Mario Bensi
Join OWB team on freenode IRC, channel #owb
Web-enabler for CE devices
www.pleyo.com
On Tue, 11/4/08, mario bensi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seen in Changeset 3810, you force a leak, it's the
same thing for the cache
and others parts in webCore, I would understand why you
want leak some part of
code ?
Do you mean r38104?
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/38104
This
yes it's r38104, sorry.
I seen also this in cache :
~Cache(); // Not implemented to make sure nobody accidentally calls delete --
WebCore does not delete singletons.
it's also to make shutdown faster ? this can create a big leak, no ?
Mario
Le mardi 04 novembre 2008 22:04:39 David Kilzer,
I seen also this in cache :
~Cache(); // Not implemented to make sure nobody accidentally calls
delete --
WebCore does not delete singletons.
it's also to make shutdown faster ? this can create a big leak, no ?
Destruction of items in the cache is not tied to the lifetime of the
cache.
I find a leak with valgrind when running QtLauncher
and load pages that requires plugins.
It is that the m_module member in WebCore::PluginPackage class is not freed.
I took a look at the code and realized that this member must freed with
a delay through freeLibrarySoon method that is callen from
11 matches
Mail list logo
