16.11.2009, в 19:54, Chris Jerdonek написал(а):
Second, do people prefer nested namespace blocks to end with the
fully-qualified name (e.g. // namespace JSC::WREC) or just the final
name (e.g. // namespace WREC)? I have seen both.
I actually prefer no comment after the namespace ending
On Nov 18, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
I actually prefer no comment after the namespace ending brace. If I have any
concerns about namespaces not being properly closed, I won't believe the
comment anyway, and will check by double-clicking on the closing brace to
select
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Nov 16, 2009, at 7:54 PM, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
So, I was wondering if we can clarify the rule to apply only to the
outermost namespace declaration.
Yes, I think we can.
(Consecutive declarations like namespace JSC {
On Nov 16, 2009, at 7:54 PM, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
First, it seems like the original motive was to avoid pointlessly indenting
nearly the whole file:
https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2009-September/010002.html
So, I was wondering if we can clarify the rule to apply only to
4 matches
Mail list logo
