On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Steve Souders st...@souders.org wrote:
I like the option of putting the manifest in the HTML. That was the main
suggestion I was going to make. You don't *have* to do it, but if you really
care about performance you could choose to do it.
James mentions: The
From http://lists.webkit.org/:
ListDescription
webkit-help [no description available]
Hmmm, yes, there would seem to be some scope to make that a little
more descriptive! ;-)
G.
On Nov 17, 2009, at 11:46 PM, Zoltan Herczeg wrote:
I think 3 sounds best. 4 seems reasonable. If we need to go with 1 or 2,
we should talk to Mozilla to decide whether to standardize on the x or use
our own prefixes.
If we go with option 3, I think a WebKit blog post would be a good way to
make out intentions for WebSockets clear.
On Wed, Nov
Alexander Limi wrote:
Good people of Webkit!
We'd all like for the web to be faster, and therefore I'd love your feedback
on my proposal — it would be great to see support for this in additional
browsers, not just Firefox:
http://limi.net/articles/resource-packages/
Summary:
What if there was
Sergiy Temnikov wrote:
Hi,
We are working on a new application server that uses WebKit for
server-side JavaScript execution (and remote JavaScript debugging
too). ... For example, the first thing we had to
deal with is the JS debugger. Debugger interface is defined in
JavaScriptCore but its
Hi guys,
I recently found a potential bug in WebKit:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31607
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31607
It's fairly crucial for me that this feature should work as advocated (or
that there is at least
a possible workaround for it), so I thought I'd take a
On Nov 18, 2009, at 12:40 AM, Gavin Barraclough wrote:
From http://lists.webkit.org/:
ListDescription
webkit-help [no description available]
Hmmm, yes, there would seem to be some scope to make that a little more
descriptive! ;-)
16.11.2009, в 19:54, Chris Jerdonek написал(а):
Second, do people prefer nested namespace blocks to end with the
fully-qualified name (e.g. // namespace JSC::WREC) or just the final
name (e.g. // namespace WREC)? I have seen both.
I actually prefer no comment after the namespace ending
On Nov 18, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
I actually prefer no comment after the namespace ending brace. If I have any
concerns about namespaces not being properly closed, I won't believe the
comment anyway, and will check by double-clicking on the closing brace to
select
18.11.2009, в 9:06, Eddy Bruël написал(а):
I've checked out the most recent WebKit sources, and made a debug
build. I then linked my
program against the resulting WebKit.Framework, and used the headers
in the corresponding
WebKit.Framework/Headers directory
Did you try the steps in
I had to do this same thing as I didn't have perl on our platform. I
found modifying the perl script to output just the commands instead of
actually running them was helpful. I could then just grab this output
and run it wherever.
Regards,
Jason.
-Original Message-
From:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Alexander Limi l...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:53 PM, James Robinson jam...@google.com wrote:
Yes, actual numbers would be nice to have.
Steve Souders just emailed me some preliminary numbers from a bunch of
major web sites, so that should
Overall, I think the general idea.
I'm concerned about the head-of-line blocking that it introduces. If an
administrator poorly constructs the bundle, he could significantly hurt
perf. Instead of using gzip, you could use a framer which chunked items
before gzipping. This might be more trouble
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Mike Belshe m...@belshe.com wrote:
Overall, I think the general idea.
I meant to say Overall I like the general idea
I'm concerned about the head-of-line blocking that it introduces. If an
administrator poorly constructs the bundle, he could
Cool, thanks for the feedback. It does seem like most people (well, outside
of this list ;) like the direction a lot.
The one issue that I agree with, and would like to find an elegant solution
to, is how to specify the manifest in the HTML instead of in the zip file to
reduce blocking and start
Hi All,
As a game developer with interests in mobile, I'd like to say overall, I
think the idea sucks.
Incorrectly implemented clients will end up downloading large resources
multiple times, and web masters are sure to start adding every resource to
pages that don't need them.
As I see it, the
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
Another caching-related issue involves versioning of the archives. If
version 2 of a zip contains only a few files modified since version 1,
and I have version 1 cached, is there some way to take advantage of
that?
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Nov 16, 2009, at 7:54 PM, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
So, I was wondering if we can clarify the rule to apply only to the
outermost namespace declaration.
Yes, I think we can.
(Consecutive declarations like namespace JSC {
Hi all,
I am using WebKit-r51075, the lastest WebKit version.
now the question:
1, line 1354 of RecordSpan() in JavaScriptCore/wtf/FastMalloc.cpp : if
(span-length 1)
2, span-length is type uintptr_t, while 1 is int, are there any error
potentials for this compare?
3, I run GtkLauncher on my
19 matches
Mail list logo
