On Oct 11, 2010, at 5:15 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Oct 11, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
On Oct 11, 2010, at 3:35 PM, James Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
For accelerated 2D rendering we created a class called
On Oct 12, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
But refcounting is simpler and my current patch has a clear() method on
DrawingBuffer which gets rid of all the resources. I could leave that method
and change to a refcounted model, so the author can control when the
resources are
On Oct 12, 2010, at 10:44 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
On Oct 12, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
But refcounting is simpler and my current patch has a clear() method on
DrawingBuffer which gets rid of all the resources. I could leave that method
and change to a refcounted model, so the
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 11, 2010, at 5:15 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Oct 11, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
On Oct 11, 2010, at 3:35 PM, James Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Chris Marrin
On Oct 12, 2010, at 12:44 PM, James Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 11, 2010, at 5:15 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Oct 11, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
On Oct 11, 2010, at 3:35 PM, James Robinson wrote:
To add a concrete data point, http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/69517 caused
a number of SVG tests to fail. It required 14 text rebaselines for Mac and
a further two more for Leopard (done by Adam Barth). In order to pass the
pixel tests in Chromium, it required 1506 new pixel baselines (checked
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:43 PM, James Robinson jam...@google.com wrote:
- Do we have the tools and infrastructure needed to do mass rebaselines in
WebKit currently? We've built a number of tools to deal with the Chromium
expectations, but since this has been a need unique to Chromium so far
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Jian Li jia...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
I am looking into hooking up ArrayBuffer support in FileReader and
BlobBuilder. It seems that most of the typed array types (ArrayBuffer,
ArrayBufferView, Uint8Array, and etc) have already been implemented in
WebKit,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Jian Li jia...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
I am looking into hooking up ArrayBuffer support in FileReader and
BlobBuilder. It seems that most of the typed array types (ArrayBuffer,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 12, 2010, at 12:44 PM, James Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 11, 2010, at 5:15 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Oct 11, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Chris
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:43 PM, James Robinson jam...@google.com wrote:
To add a concrete data point, http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/69517 caused
a number of SVG tests to fail. It required 14 text rebaselines for Mac and
a further two more for Leopard (done by Adam Barth). In order to
On Oct 12, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
...So it seems like we have two choices: 1) my current patch, which uses
backpointers to manage the lifetime of the weak pointers, or 2) refcounting.
My current approach has the advantage that the resources are cleared as soon
as the
On Oct 12, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
Hmm, I've found weak pointer abstractions to be very useful. The issue with
reference counting is that it is easy to introduce memory leaks, and has
been mentioned,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 12, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
Hmm, I've found weak pointer abstractions to be very useful. The issue
with reference counting
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 12, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
Hmm, I've found weak pointer abstractions to be very useful. The issue
with reference counting
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 6:37 PM, James Robinson jam...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 12, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
Hmm, I've found weak
Not sure it is relevant to this discussion, but WebKit had a weak pointer class
back in 2002 and I removed it.
-- Darin
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Caused more harm than good?
-Darin
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
Not sure it is relevant to this discussion, but WebKit had a weak pointer
class back in 2002 and I removed it.
-- Darin
___
webkit-dev
Does it support pixel test updates? Is it possible to extend this tool if not?
This would limit the maintenance cost and every commiter should rebaseline mac
if the change is a progression, or the difference is machine dependent
(but not OS dependent).
Dirk
Am 12.10.2010 um 22:49 schrieb Adam
On Oct 12, 2010, at 10:03 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 12, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
Hmm, I've found weak pointer abstractions
I don't know if this is what Darin (Adler) is referring to, but at one point I
think there was a special weak pointer for Nodes to point back to their
Document. This turned out to be the wrong design since for Web-compatible
behavior you really want the document to stay alive while the node is
21 matches
Mail list logo
