On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:16 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 2013, at 6:54 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
It's much easier
On Feb 17, 2013, at 12:08 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:16 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
On Feb 16,
On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:04 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
On Feb 17, 2013, at 12:08 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 16,
On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:09 AM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:04 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
The discussion on each single feature let us forget the greater scope of
this problem. That is why I did not start with a concrete example.
What about
Hi,
It seems something happened with build.webkit.org.
There are pending builds on all builder, but the
master doesn't make slaves start these builds.
Could you check what happened with the buildbot master, please?
Ossy
___
webkit-dev mailing list
(Resending from the right address, sorry...)
Perhaps relatedly (but probably not), the CQ and other Chromium EWS bots
apparently died about 13 hours ago: http://webkit-commit-queue.appspot.com/
Adam, Eric, mind taking a quick look?
-mike
-Mike
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Mike West
On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:28 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:09 AM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:04 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
The discussion on each single feature let us forget the greater scope of
this
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:28 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:09 AM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:04 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
The discussion on
App engine error perhaps?
http://webkit-commit-queue.appspot.com/active-bots
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Mike West mk...@chromium.org wrote:
(Resending from the right address, sorry...)
Perhaps relatedly (but probably not), the CQ and other Chromium EWS bots
apparently died about 13
24.22.211.12 - - [17/Feb/2013:09:35:10 -0800] GET /active-bots
HTTP/1.1 500 0 http://webkit-commit-queue.appspot.com/; Mozilla/5.0
(Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_2) AppleWebKit/537.17 (KHTML, like
Gecko) Chrome/24.0.1312.57 Safari/537.17
webkit-commit-queue.appspot.com ms=9380 cpu_ms=2030
On 14/02/2013, at 6:23 pm, Vivek Galatage vivekgalat...@gmail.com wrote:
I had the same problem and was able to trace the reason for this.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1889559/git-diff-to-ignore-m
Its the ^M characters at the EOL. git diff --ignore-space-at-eol ignores the
change
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
Then we should face it. Prefixed content for CSS gradients, animation,
transition, transforms, CSS Image functions, masking and a lot more will
not go away. This basically means we will need to support them for an
On Feb 17, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
Then we should face it. Prefixed content for CSS gradients, animation,
transition, transforms, CSS Image functions, masking and a lot more will not
go
On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
On Feb 17, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
Then we should face it. Prefixed content for CSS gradients, animation,
I wonder if the git-taking-over-the-project trend has continued a year later.
I'm also glad to see efforts like
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110073 towards standardizing
on a simpler git workflow. :)
Thanks again for running the survey.
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Maciej
There's probably proportionately more people using Git. Making these web
surveys is a pain, so I'd rather not do it again if we don't need to.
What would be the pros and cons of the master repository being git instead of
svn, for git users?
(For current svn users I assume using svn would
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
There's probably proportionately more people using Git. Making these web
surveys is a pain, so I'd rather not do it again if we don't need to.
What would be the pros and cons of the master repository being git instead
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
There's probably proportionately more people using Git. Making these web
surveys is a pain, so I'd rather not do it again if we don't need to.
What
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
There's probably proportionately more people using Git. Making these web
surveys is a pain, so I'd rather not do it again if we don't need to.
19 matches
Mail list logo
