On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> >
> > There's probably proportionately more people using Git. Making these web
> surveys is a pain, so I'd rather not do it again if we don't need to.
> >
> > What would be the pros
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>
>> There's probably proportionately more people using Git. Making these web
>> surveys is a pain, so I'd rather not do it again if we don't need to.
>>
>> What would be the pros an
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> There's probably proportionately more people using Git. Making these web
> surveys is a pain, so I'd rather not do it again if we don't need to.
>
> What would be the pros and cons of the master repository being git instead of
> svn,
There's probably proportionately more people using Git. Making these web
surveys is a pain, so I'd rather not do it again if we don't need to.
What would be the pros and cons of the master repository being git instead of
svn, for git users?
(For current svn users I assume using svn would beco
I wonder if the git-taking-over-the-project trend has continued a year later.
I'm also glad to see efforts like
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110073 towards standardizing
on a simpler git workflow. :)
Thanks again for running the survey.
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Maciej Stachowia
On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>
> On Feb 17, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>>>
>>> Then we should face it. Prefixed content for CSS gradients, animation,
>>> transition, transforms, CSS Image functions, mask
On Feb 17, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>> On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:28 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>> On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:09 AM, Filip Pizlo wrote:
On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:04 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
> The discussion on eac
On Feb 17, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>> Then we should face it. Prefixed content for CSS gradients, animation,
>> transition, transforms, CSS Image functions, masking and a lot more will not
>> go away. This basically means w
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
> Then we should face it. Prefixed content for CSS gradients, animation,
> transition, transforms, CSS Image functions, masking and a lot more will
> not go away. This basically means we will need to support them for an
> undetermined period of
On 14/02/2013, at 6:23 pm, Vivek Galatage wrote:
> I had the same problem and was able to trace the reason for this.
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1889559/git-diff-to-ignore-m
>
> Its the ^M characters at the EOL. git diff --ignore-space-at-eol ignores the
> change from the diff.
>
24.22.211.12 - - [17/Feb/2013:09:35:10 -0800] "GET /active-bots
HTTP/1.1" 500 0 "http://webkit-commit-queue.appspot.com/"; "Mozilla/5.0
(Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_2) AppleWebKit/537.17 (KHTML, like
Gecko) Chrome/24.0.1312.57 Safari/537.17"
"webkit-commit-queue.appspot.com" ms=9380 cpu_ms=2030
App engine error perhaps?
http://webkit-commit-queue.appspot.com/active-bots
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Mike West wrote:
> (Resending from the right address, sorry...)
>
> Perhaps relatedly (but probably not), the CQ and other Chromium EWS bots
> apparently died about 13 hours ago: http:/
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
> On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:28 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:09 AM, Filip Pizlo wrote:
>>> On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:04 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
The discussion on each single feature let us forget the greater scope of
>>>
On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:28 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:09 AM, Filip Pizlo wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:04 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The discussion on each single feature let us forget the greater scope of
>>> this problem. That is why I did not s
(Resending from the right address, sorry...)
Perhaps relatedly (but probably not), the CQ and other Chromium EWS bots
apparently died about 13 hours ago: http://webkit-commit-queue.appspot.com/
Adam, Eric, mind taking a quick look?
-mike
-Mike
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Mike West wrot
Hi, Benjamin
Thank you so much for advice and review.
You are right that we can not expect different platform to render as
same pixel images.
I have modified source code based on comment.
And modified TestExpectations(add line such as following) for chromium,
gtk, win and qt.
# Needs rebase
Hi,
It seems something happened with build.webkit.org.
There are pending builds on all builder, but the
master doesn't make slaves start these builds.
Could you check what happened with the buildbot master, please?
Ossy
___
webkit-dev mailing list
web
On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:09 AM, Filip Pizlo wrote:
>
> On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:04 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>
>>
>> The discussion on each single feature let us forget the greater scope of
>> this problem. That is why I did not start with a concrete example.
>>
>> What about going another directi
On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:04 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>
> On Feb 17, 2013, at 12:08 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>>> On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:16 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
> On Feb 16,
On Feb 17, 2013, at 12:08 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>> On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>> On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:16 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
On Feb 16, 2013, at 6:54 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> It's much ea
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:16 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>>> On Feb 16, 2013, at 6:54 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>>>
It's much easier to discuss a concrete example. Which interface are
>>
21 matches
Mail list logo
