Re: [webkit-dev] Position on emerging standard: Declarative Shadow DOM
Hello WebKit folks, I just wanted to quickly ping this thread to see if there was any interest in posting a position on declarative Shadow DOM. My original post here didn't gather much feedback. :-) Thanks, Mason On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:11 PM Mason Freed wrote: > Hello WebKit! > > I would like to request an official WebKit position on the Declarative > Shadow DOM proposal. There have been some great comments and discussion > from WebKit folks on the issue thread, but it is a bit unclear whether the > overall proposal is something WebKit would support. This was brought up and > discussed, e.g., on the DOM spec PR here: > https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/858#issuecomment-623735890 > > Please see below for all of the relevant supporting documents and > discussions. > > Explainer: > https://github.com/mfreed7/declarative-shadow-dom/blob/master/README.md > WhatWG DOM Issue discussion: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/831 > HTML Spec PR: https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/5465 > DOM Spec PR: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/858 > TAG review: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/494 > Request for Mozilla Position: > https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/335 > > Thanks, > Mason Freed > > ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
[webkit-dev] Big Sur EWS and Apple Silicon
Hello all, Recently, Aakash Jain and I have brought up Big Sur Trunk and EWS builders. These machines are building with the Big Sur Seed 3 SDK on machine running Big Sur Seed 3. Usually WebKit does not support developer seeds in automation, but universal binaries for Apple Silicon are sufficiently different from existing configurations that we wanted to provide this build configuration to WebKit developers through EWS. The ‘mac-AS’ (standing for Mac, Apple Silicon) is the bubble corresponding to this new configuration. Thank you all for your contributions, Jonathan Bedard ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Request for position on MediaRecorder constant bitrate audio encoding
Great, thanks! I will update the Chrome status with a positive signal for webkit. Thanks again, Simon On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 21:55, youenn fablet wrote: > Hi Simon, > > I think CBR for MediaRecorder is fine. It also got consensus within > the WebRTC WG. > > Le ven. 31 juil. 2020 à 10:53, Simon Jackson > a écrit : > > > > Hello WebKit-dev, > > > > I'd like to ask for Webkit's official position on a change to the > editors draft of the mediacapture-record specification to make it possible > to request either constant or variable bitrate audio encoding from the > MediaRecorder. > > > > Specification: > https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-record/#mediarecorder-api > > Pull request & discussion of additions: w3c/mediacapture-record#185 > > Explainer: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/10OheBob6lP7v-fO89g0A5F9BYnsMEU5Nkh4p-Bk0wMg/edit?usp=sharing > > Chromestatus entry: https://chromestatus.com/feature/5730124735447040 > > > > A new enumeration (BitrateMode) has been added for specifying either > constant or variable bitrate for audio encoding, MediaRecorderOptions has > an extra field called audioBitrateMode for requesting a specific bitrate > mode from the MediaRecorder and a field was added to MediaRecorder for > retrieving the bitrate mode being used for encoding. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Simon > > > > ___ > > webkit-dev mailing list > > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev > ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
