If you're willing to give it a shot, then that sounds like a fine idea.
- Maciej
On Jul 15, 2009, at 10:51 PM, Ryan Leavengood wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
One belated comment on this topic. It would be neat if some port
agreed to
be the guinea pig to
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> One belated comment on this topic. It would be neat if some port agreed to
> be the guinea pig to see if gyp could plausibly work for more than Google's
> ports. The Wx port probably has the lowest resources of any complete port in
> the
On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:13 PM, David Kilzer wrote:
On Saturday, July 11, 2009 11:55:36 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Jul 11, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
On Jul 10, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Perhaps we should make update-webkit (or some new wrapper type
tool)
r
On Saturday, July 11, 2009 11:55:36 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
>
> > On Jul 10, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> >
> >> Perhaps we should make update-webkit (or some new wrapper type tool)
> >> run resolve-ChangeLogs automatically.
I'll try to get bugs filed for any part of the plan that isn't done by
tomorrow, and I'll tag them with a keyword so we can track progress.
On Jul 15, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Adam Treat wrote:
On Friday 10 July 2009 06:55:59 pm Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
* Phase 1 *
A) Make it really easy to subm
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Adam Treat wrote:
> http://www.webkit.org/pending-review
>
> The page above already lists the review queue sorted by date. Over the
> last
> few days the queue has numbered in the 100's. A significant fraction
> (50%+)
> are older than a week. I could highlight
On Friday 10 July 2009 06:55:59 pm Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> * Phase 1 *
>
> A) Make it really easy to submit a patch. Eric's bugzilla-tool is
> close to being there. I'm going to help him refine this tool to the
> point that submitting a patch has only one step - a single command
> will make the
On Wednesday 15 July 2009 03:59:53 pm John Abd-El-Malek wrote:
> I don't want to open the can of worms that is git vs other source control
> systems. However given that the instructions for developing WebKit are for
> svn and there already exists svn-apply/unapply scripts, I think there are
> enou
I don't want to open the can of worms that is git vs other source control
systems. However given that the instructions for developing WebKit are for
svn and there already exists svn-apply/unapply scripts, I think there are
enough WebKit devs using svn that warrant improving this process flow.
On
>One thing to look out for is that I don't thin the NPAPI is fully implemented
>on S60.
it is pretty much fully implemented on S60 AFAIK, though the API got
"symbianized" for some reason, by changing some data types (char*) to
Symbian types (HBufC*).
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/S60/trunk/WebKi
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 13:15 -0700, Darin Adler wrote:
> To follow bug activities on a particular component, we should probably
> add a Bugzilla watch feature that lets you follow bug activities on a
> component.
I was talking about this with Mark Rowe this week: what we need is to
enable the Q
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 18:18 -0700, John Abd-El-Malek wrote:
> this changelist. Operations such as "gcl upload CHANGENAME" (upload
> to Rietveld) work on the group of files at the same time (also things
> like gcl diff/commit/revert). The nice thing about it that on such
> large codebases, develop
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 14:32 -0400, tonikitoo (Antonio Gomes) wrote:
> "I grew up listing and seeing people not writing their emails *as it*
> and publishing on the internet"
>
> so would replacing by be a
> good practice ?
I always failed to see much wisdom in this. It might be because I alwa
13 matches
Mail list logo
