[webkit-dev] status update: webkit gobject bindings [svn r46395]

2009-07-26 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
this is a progress report for archival and informational purposes on the upkeep of bug #16401, providing useable and useful glib / gobject bindings to the full webkit DOM implementation. pending inclusion in webkit svn, the code is being kept up-to-date on an ad-hoc basis at

Re: [webkit-dev] status update: webkit gobject bindings [svn r46395]

2009-07-26 Thread David Levin
Maybe zecke's email wasn't clear. Here's another attempt: Brevity is the soul of wit --William Shakespear Verbosity hinders your goals. dave On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton luke.leigh...@googlemail.com wrote: this is a progress report for archival and

Re: [webkit-dev] Reformatting-only patches being applied to trunk

2009-07-26 Thread David Levin
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: We could also hook [the style checker] into any create-patch scripts so that patches [from] (new) contributors upload don't need to be manually vetted by a reviewer for style. This could be done without making all code

Re: [webkit-dev] status update: webkit gobject bindings [svn r46395]

2009-07-26 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
Let me put it even more strongly. Luke, you need to stop sending long, rambling emails to the list. Many people have complained about both the form and content of your messages, and no one but you has spoken up that they find these emails useful. If you don't have the judgment to

Re: [webkit-dev] status update: webkit gobject bindings [svn r46395]

2009-07-26 Thread Ryan Leavengood
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Maciej Stachowiakm...@apple.com wrote: Luke, you need to stop sending long, rambling emails to the list. For what it is worth, I completely agree with Maciej's statement. I am not (yet) a committer and have no association with Apple or any of the other WebKit