Hi,
seems the original mail was sent to both webkit-dev and webkit-help. My
reply was on webkit-help, and the discussion continued there.
https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-help/2009-November/000380.html
Perhaps we should clarify better the purpose of these mailing lists, since
if people
Hi Darin,
Check out the plugins in Mozilla which are NPAPI based.
mozilla\modules\plugin\samples\npruntime... try this one especially.. This
works on Linux platform.. by modifying the makefile...
Thanks and Regards
Rekha
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2009,
On Nov 16, 2009, at 7:54 PM, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
> First, it seems like the original motive was to avoid pointlessly indenting
> nearly the whole file:
>
> https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2009-September/010002.html
>
> So, I was wondering if we can clarify the rule to apply only
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2009, at 4:51 AM, kevin631012 wrote:
>
>> I installed Webkit on ubuntu 9.04 , then I run some plugins code in folder
>> WebKitExamplePlugins seems to be not working . those samples code are
>> developed on Mac , problems is I all d
On Oct 7, 2009, at 4:51 AM, kevin631012 wrote:
> I installed Webkit on ubuntu 9.04 , then I run some plugins code in folder
> WebKitExamplePlugins seems to be not working . those samples code are
> developed on Mac , problems is I all develop my code on Linux . I am not
> familiar with Mac .
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Nov 15, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Yuzo Fujishima wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I'm against prefixing with "webkit-" because of the following reasons.
>>
>> Reason 1: It connotes that the feature is experimental. That means there
>> will be less dev
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> Your doc explicitly says manifests are optional: "To give the browser the
> ability to know up front what files are in the zip file without reading the
> entire file first, we support an *optional* manifest file that can contain
> this info
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Alexander Limi wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Peter Kasting
> wrote:
>
>> Reduced parallelism is a big concern of mine. Lots of sites make heavy
>> use of resource sharding across many hostnames to take advantage of multiple
>> connections, which thi
Hi Eddy.
> Sure, I'll file a bug report for you.
Thanks!
> About your workaround though: wouldn't
> invokeUndefinedMethodFromWebScript:withArguments:
> only be called when the user tries to call a method that is not explicitly
> exposed to Javascript?
Yes.
To clarify, I think that the simpl
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:53 PM, James Robinson wrote:
> Yes, actual numbers would be nice to have.
Steve Souders just emailed me some preliminary numbers from a bunch of major
web sites, so that should be on his blog shortly.
--
Alexander Limi · Firefox User Experience · http://limi.net
___
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Alexander Limi wrote:
> (Adding in some of the people involved with Resource Packages earlier to
> this thread, so they can help me out — I'm just a lowly UI designer, so
some
> of these questions have to be answered by people that know how browsers
> work. I'm jus
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:00 PM, James Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Alexander Limi wrote:
>>
>> Good people of Webkit!
>>
>> We'd all like for the web to be faster, and therefore I'd love your feedback
>> on my proposal — it would be great to see support for this in additio
(Adding in some of the people involved with Resource Packages earlier to
this thread, so they can help me out — I'm just a lowly UI designer, so some
of these questions have to be answered by people that know how browsers
work. I'm just the messenger. Hope you don't mind, guys, and remember that
w
I don't see much value in this proposition.
For CSS and JS, people will need to run a script to generate the ZIP
file. That's what they already do when combining files. And they get
more value by combining since they get performance improvements for
all browsers, not just the one supporting resour
Hi, Maciej,
I vote for (3).
Yuzo
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Nov 15, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Yuzo Fujishima wrote:
Hi,
I'm against prefixing with "webkit-" because of the following reasons.
Reason 1: It connotes that the feature is experimental. That means
The Chromium port of WebKit already acts very much like a headless build of
WebKit owing to the Chromium sandbox, which denies the WebKit process access
to most features of the system, including the GUI system.
The interface lives here:
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/WebKit/chromium
Documen
Hi Geoffrey,
Sure, I'll file a bug report for you.
About your workaround though: wouldn't
invokeUndefinedMethodFromWebScript:withArguments:
only be called when the user tries to call a method that is not explicitly
exposed to Javascript?
Say for instance, that instead of calling a method by writi
On Nov 4, 2009, at 8:37 AM, ll Jefferry wrote:
Hi,
when i reading the jit for arm source code, i am not very clear the
functionality of the flowing functions:
ctiTrampoline
This code is used when entering from the C runtime into JIT generated
code. JIT generated code does not ne
Update:
The queue is still down. I tried turning it on this morning and of
the 5 patches I let it process, it rejected 4 of them due to
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31461 before I turned it off.
Good news: some progress has been made towards understanding
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_
You should simply copy the entire command line you see in the
run-javascriptcore-tests output, eg.
/path/to/jsc -s -f ./ecma/shell.js -f ./ecma/Date/15.9.5.17.js
--Oliver
On Nov 6, 2009, at 12:14 AM, ll Jefferry wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I bring up webkit with jit on my stb box. I want to test th
Hi,
We are working on a new application server that uses WebKit for server-side
JavaScript execution (and remote JavaScript debugging too). However, we can not
use WebKit as is because we can not link with any of the GUI libraries and
WebKit does. Instead, we compile just the JavaScriptCore pa
Hi,
I wanted to see the element contents of the document. For that I had to put
breakpoints in the Dump Render Tree Project's LayoutTestController.h and
DumpRenderTree.cpp.
But these were of no use as that code was not visited. It showed that "No
symbols are loaded".
Please could anyone help me
>
> Hi,
>
>I bring up webkit with jit on my stb box. I want to test the jit if it
> is fine. When i run the mozilla test cases, i found that it need the
> perl tools. But my platform has not the perl environment, my question is
> that:
>
> can i run the test cases one by one under shell enviro
Hi,
I bring up webkit with jit on my stb box. I want to test the jit if it is
fine. When i run the mozilla test cases, i found that it need the
perl tools. But my platform has not the perl environment, my question is
that:
can i run the test cases one by one under shell environment? such us .
>
> Hi,
>
> when i reading the jit for arm source code, i am not very clear the
> functionality of the flowing functions:
> ctiTrampoline
> ctiVMThrowTrampoline
> ctiOpThrowNotCaught
>
> could you explain to me?
> and another question is that: in cacheFlush function, why
It seems that http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/clutter
has no activity for a long time .
Does the work of Webkit for clutter have been cancel or stopped now ?
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cg
Hello there!
I am wondering if anyone (especially from the Qt team who ported the webkit to
Qt4.6) has any pointers or idea about this issue I am seeing on QtLauncher.
When a prompt is issued using Javascript and the user presses OK without
entering anything in the text input box (leaving the
Hi all ~
I've spent several months to build Webkit and depending libraries using
RVCT.
First, I built webkit for WindowsXP and then used those generated codes for
my ARM platform.
And now I can see text HTML rendered on my target.
Problem is spaces are shown as newline.
That is,
Hello World
Hello Mike.
> I think one person indicated that ICU was not built correctly. I think my
> ICU is ok, so how do I prove otherwise.
This looks like an ICU issue to me. ICU will sometimes appear to build
correctly, but will not
shout about certain build problems that can arise whilst cross-compili
Iam trying to complie WebKit-r50048 in CentOS 5 machine.I have Qt version
4.2.1 installed and when i run
export WEBKITOUTPUTDIR=`pwd`/qtbuild
export QTDIR=/usr/lib64/qt4
export PATH=/usr/lib64/qt4/bin:$PATH
*./build-webkit --makeargs="-j20 -s" --no-video --release*
I get the following errors.Not
Hi,
Webkit depend on enchant for spell check, is this optional?
If does, how can i disable it?
BR,
-Simon
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Very nice work! This is promising!
- Mohamed Mansour
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:56 AM, wrote:
>
> FYI, we have just released experimental branch of multitouch support of
> QtWebKit for Windows7 on gitorious.
>
> More information: demo videos, source code and binaries, and a small
> developer gu
I've read somewhere that you can set the environment http_proxy variable
before launching a webkit-based browser on linux. I tried that on my fedora
and it didn't work. Any ideas?
Luying
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://list
Hi guys,
I installed Webkit on ubuntu 9.04 , then I run some plugins code in folder
WebKitExamplePlugins seems to be not working . those samples code are developed
on Mac , problems is I all develop my code on Linux . I am not familiar with
Mac .
is there anyone give me some suggestions then I
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:14 PM, James Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Peter Kasting
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:00 PM, James Robinson
> wrote:
> >> It seems like a browser will have to essentially stop rendering until
> >> it has finished downloading the entire .z
On Nov 15, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
Does the IETF WG have a timeline? My understanding is that IETF WG
take at least a year to do anything.
Here's the timeline for the HyBi WG:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/HyBi
Goa
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:00 PM, James Robinson wrote:
>>
>> It seems like a browser will have to essentially stop rendering until
>> it has finished downloading the entire .zip and examined it.
>
> I think mitigating this is why there are o
On Nov 17, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:00 PM, James Robinson
wrote:
It seems like a browser will have to essentially stop rendering until
it has finished downloading the entire .zip and examined it.
I think mitigating this is why there are optional manife
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:00 PM, James Robinson wrote:
> It seems like a browser will have to essentially stop rendering until
> it has finished downloading the entire .zip and examined it.
I think mitigating this is why there are optional manifests. I agree that
if there's no manifest, this i
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Alexander Limi wrote:
>
> Good people of Webkit!
>
> We'd all like for the web to be faster, and therefore I'd love your feedback
> on my proposal — it would be great to see support for this in additional
> browsers, not just Firefox:
>
> http://limi.net/articles
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Alexander Limi wrote:
> We'd all like for the web to be faster, and therefore I'd love your
> feedback on my proposal
>
I have read the whole document, but I read it quickly, so please do point
out places where I've overlooked an obvious response.
Reduced parall
Could you be more specific? Most of the comments seem to be a result of
people not actually reading the spec.
As for the comments in the article itself:
- You still do parallel downloads, and you can have multiple resource
packages.
- The zip can have expiry headers, and can be invalidat
I have many of the same concerns mentioned here:
http://ajaxian.com/archives/resource-packages-making-a-faster-web-via-packaging
dave
(hy...@apple.com)
On Nov 17, 2009, at 4:19 PM, Alexander Limi wrote:
Good people of Webkit!
We'd all like for the web to be faster, and therefore I'd love you
Good people of Webkit!
We'd all like for the web to be faster, and therefore I'd love your feedback
on my proposal — it would be great to see support for this in additional
browsers, not just Firefox:
http://limi.net/articles/resource-packages/
Summary:
What if there was a backwards compatible w
On Nov 15, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Yuzo Fujishima wrote:
Hi,
I'm against prefixing with "webkit-" because of the following reasons.
Reason 1: It connotes that the feature is experimental. That means
there
will be less developers seriously use that feature. Without serious
use,
we'll have less s
Hi Eddy.
This seems like a bug to me. Would you be willing to file it at bugs.webkit.org?
I have a guess at a possible work-around. In the class where you've implemented
valueForUndefinedKey:, try also implementing
invokeUndefinedMethodFromWebScript:withArguments:.
Thanks,
Geoff
On Nov 17, 20
> I believe the idea is in fact to start with a GTK+/Qt on Linux bot
> (since it should be simpler to setup).
Neat.
Geoff
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Hi everybody,
I am in the process of writing some code in ObjC, which would allow
me to make calls from Javascript to C++ objects implementing a
simple reflection interface (it basically allows you to associated
indices with names, and perform operations such as
getting/setting/calling on these in
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 18:48 -0800, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
> I understand why you want to start with a Mac bot, and I applaud
> starting small. However, bear in mind that lots of WebKit contributors
> work primarily on the Mac, so they probably won't get any use out of a
> Mac try bot, and you probab
It was agreed on IRC that having DRTs able to handle error pages in
not a bad thing, but good since it brings DRT closer to a real
browsers behavior. Hence, I moved on here and implemented it for QT's
DRT (see https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31509#c0).
Currently the single test depending o
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
>
> 15.11.2009, в 17:18, Yuzo Fujishima написал:
>
>
> Reason 1: It connotes that the feature is experimental. That means there
>> will be less developers seriously use that feature. Without serious use,
>> we'll have less serious feedb
Hello,
for us too, as many of you poited out before me, the main issue is not
build breakage while maintaining the QtWebKit buildbot - because these
are most of the time trivial fixes - but tracking down the previously
passing but after-the-night failing tests.
Because of the timezone differenc
Hi Dirk,
I wasn't aware of another bug, sorry.
Actually on the patch that I have already attached to that bug, it
seems to work in the few test cases I've been able to find (my own and
a couple from the SVGT 1.2 test suite). While stroking, I transform
the path with the CTM of the context and un
53 matches
Mail list logo
