Hi Maciej,
Thanks for clarifying your concerns. I will address them a little
out-of-order, because I think we probably agree on the important
things even if we disagree on the less-important or more theoretical
things.
First, as far as the "future" discoveries go, I agree we should try to
fix as
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:54, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> Is there data on:
> - The user impact of modal dialogs being fired from before unload, unload or
> page hide - how often does this happen?
> - The Web compatibility impact of removing this functionality (are the sites
> that do it using it
Is there data on:
- The user impact of modal dialogs being fired from before unload, unload or
page hide - how often does this happen?
- The Web compatibility impact of removing this functionality (are the sites
that do it using it for seemingly legitimate reasons)?
I can think of two ways to
As you know, I'm a very strong advocate of this change. I think even if
other
ports aren't interested in experimenting with this change at the current
time,
that we should proceed to experiment with it in Chromium. I would very much
like us to have data about how many sites are impacted, so that
On Apr 6, 2011, at 10:33 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I understand you, but if I do, this is what I was
> attempting to talk about in the paragraph above, about expecting some
> tests to be flaky or failing under NRWT simply because NRWT isn't
> exactly identical to ORWT. NRWT may be
Great to see the progress with new-run-webkit-tests!
We have been testing the new script for a while now on the QtWebKit:
http://webkit.sed.hu/buildbot/waterfall?show=x86-32%20Linux%20Qt%20Release%20new-run-webkit-tests
We do not have a test_expectations file yet, but this should change soon.
O
6 matches
Mail list logo
