On Wednesday 18 April 2012 14:03:51 Dirk Pranke wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Milian Wolff milian.wo...@kdab.com
wrote:
Hey all,
I'm working on isPrinting() support for the Qt port and noticed that if I
do something like this:
./Tools/Scripts/run-webkit-tests -p
Hi, I did WebKit roll to 114621 now.
This will be my last roll today (and of this my gardening cycle).
many webgl related layout tests failed, then I reverted a chromium side change.
It will fix failures, but you might see failures for a while because
of delayed test results.
It appears no consensus was reached? The patch is still up for review:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72955
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Ryosuke Niwa
We're capturing ideas for which LayoutTestController methods could be moved to
Internals here: https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/Internals_Hackathon.
Even found some that are completely unused in tests!
- WBR, Alexey Proskuryakov
___
webkit-dev mailing
hi，
I build webkit with gstreamer support, but I encountered a problem when I
test with it. When I write a simple statement printf(*\n) in the
function isAvailable() of MediaPlayerPrivateGStreamer.cpp, I got nothing
output. When I do the same thing with the function create of
We're discussing reducing the number of build-systems at the WebKit
meeting tomorrow @ 10am.
Interested parties should definitely be there. Especially ones who
know something about CMake (since I know nothing). :)
-eric
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Patrick Gansterer par...@paroga.com
I'm very interested in that discussion, but I can't be physically there. :-(
Is there any any possibility for me to attend it online or get a recording of
it?
-- Patrick
Am 20.04.2012 um 06:08 schrieb Eric Seidel:
We're discussing reducing the number of build-systems at the WebKit
meeting
I noticed a number of patches going in recently that add null checks, or
refactor the code under the premise of eliminating potential null
dereference. What does that mean, and why are we allowing such patches to be
landed?
For example, this change doesn't look nice:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
I noticed a number of patches going in recently that add null checks, or
refactor the code under the premise of eliminating potential null
dereference. What does that mean, and why are we allowing such patches to be
A lot of folks have laptops, so perhaps someone could be convinced to give you
the scoop by IRC.
- Maciej
On Apr 19, 2012, at 10:11 PM, Patrick Gansterer wrote:
I'm very interested in that discussion, but I can't be physically there. :-(
Is there any any possibility for me to attend it
10 matches
Mail list logo
