Hi,
I was thinking for some time whether I should reply, as there was no
question in the mail, only an opinion. I still cannot say anything else
that I respect this opinion. I am sure the intent is to make WebKit
better, the same thing most of us want here. Dirk explained the technical
part (btw w
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> Sounds like a reasonable idea. Would you be willing to file a bug and
> write a patch?
Thanks for the fast response Adam. Filed as:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103306
I'll submit a patch in the near future.
>
> Adam
>
>
> On Mon,
Sounds like a reasonable idea. Would you be willing to file a bug and
write a patch?
Adam
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Applications embedding WebKit and Chromium can use existing C++ APIs
> to dynamically add custom V8 JavaScript bindings. These bin
Hi All,
Applications embedding WebKit and Chromium can use existing C++ APIs
to dynamically add custom V8 JavaScript bindings. These bindings allow
closer integration between the script execution environment and the
host application and are currently supported for page contexts via the
FrameLoader
Hi Brian,
On 23/11/2012, at 12:01 AM, Brian Birtles wrote:
>> * At least in its current form, it is overengineered and unusable. An
>> animation API should focus on ease of use, not combining every conceivable
>> animation concept ever invented.
>
> I'd genuinely appreciate your help with reg
On 24/11/2012, at 10:56 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>
> On Nov 23, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Andreas Kling wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Do we really think it's a good idea to add yet another implementation of
>> filters?
>>
>> We already have generic, NEON-optimized and WTF::ParallelJobs (which
>> inc
Hi all,
this is my first post to the list.
I have submitted a patch [1] to add element support to webkit and
would appreciate your consideration.
the main element is defined here:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-extensions/raw-file/tip/maincontent/index.html
current
status unofficial draft, CFC [2]
7 matches
Mail list logo