I’d really like to use atomic, which isn’t supported until VS2012.
When will we VS2012?
Geoff
On Jul 28, 2013, at 9:10 PM, Brent Fulgham bfulg...@gmail.com wrote:
We can support auto and move semantics. We cannot support ranged iterators
until VS2012.
But at least it's a step in the
FWIW the GTK+ port also builds with C++11 support.
Philippe
On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 09:04 -0700, Anders Carlsson wrote:
Hi everyone,
when Oliver landed his “let’s break everything” patches in JSC the other day,
I noticed that some of the follow-up build fixes by other ports were removing
Hi all,
I'm afraid that our sh4 bot won't handle C++11 properly :
http://build.webkit.org/builders/Qt%20Linux%20SH4%20Release
$ sh4-linux-g++ --version
sh4-linux-g++ (GCC) 4.6.3 20120613 (STMicroelectronics/Linux Base 4.6.3-111)
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Julien
De :
On 07/29/2013 04:38 AM, Brianceau, Julien wrote:
Hi all,
I’m afraid that our sh4 bot won’t handle C++11 properly :
http://build.webkit.org/builders/Qt%20Linux%20SH4%20Release
$ sh4-linux-g++ --version
sh4-linux-g++ (GCC) 4.6.3 20120613 (STMicroelectronics/Linux Base
4.6.3-111)
Copyright
Allright. I took a look to STM website and I saw that they've released a sh4
toolchain based on gcc/g++ 4.7.3
So from my side it should be ok : if we encounter any issues with C++11, I'll
try to upgrade our build bot with this latest toolchain.
Julien
Hello,
so it looks like we’re in a pretty decent shape when it comes to C++11 capable
compilers.
If we limit ourselves to GCC 4.6, MSVC 2010 and a fairly recent version of
clang (Whatever comes with Xcode 4.6), we should be able to make use of a nice
chunk of C++11 features. (See
There is support for C++11 on Windows Embedded Compact 2013 using the newer
VC11 compiler, but for CE 5, 6, or WEC 7 they will not be able to support it
since they are limited to the VC9 compiler. Afaik there doesn’t appear to be
any plans from Microsoft to back-port the newer compiler and run
FYI: In gcc 4.7, things like foo%PRIuS are hard errors due to
user-defined literals (it's a disablable warning in clang and gcc4.8, and
gcc4.6 is fine since it doesn't implement user-defined literals yet), and
some system headers (dbus1.0, dbus1.2, probably others) contain code like
that. I'd
8 matches
Mail list logo