Can you be more specific about the motivation here?
Do we have any motivating examples that will tell us wether time+memory were
unacceptable before this change, or are acceptable after this change?
In our motivating examples, does Safari use more time+memory than other
browsers? If so, how lar
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 10:09 PM, Mark Lam wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Currently, if we have an exception stack that is incredibly deep (especially
> for a StackOverflowError), JSC may end up thrashing memory just to capture
> the large stack trace in memory.This is bad for many reasons:
>
>
Hi folks,
Currently, if we have an exception stack that is incredibly deep (especially
for a StackOverflowError), JSC may end up thrashing memory just to capture the
large stack trace in memory.This is bad for many reasons:
1. the captured stack will take a lot of memory.
2. capturing the s
It looks like Windows testers haven't come back up:
https://build.webkit.org/builders/Apple%20Win%207%20Debug%20%28Tests%29
https://build.webkit.org/builders/Apple%20Win%207%20Release%20%28Tests%29
- R. Niwa
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> - R. Niwa
>
>
> On T
Thanks!
- R. Niwa
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Lucas Forschler wrote:
> I’ve re-triggered everything that landed after 2:00. This is r214068 through
> 214074.
> r214075 was auto-triggered, as the build master was back online before it
> landed.
>
> Lucas
>
>> On Mar 16, 2017, at 3:44 PM,
Hi,
Is this just a code drop? Or will you be committing to its maintenance
and attempting to upstream it?
It's interesting regardless!
Michael
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
Hello WebKit developers,
We have rescheduled our switch of svn.webkit.org and git.webkit.org for
Friday (3/17) morning, between 10 and 11am PDT. We will also be moving
trac.webkit.org and perf.webkit.org during the same time.
The current svn repository will be made read-only at 10am. We will
I’ve re-triggered everything that landed after 2:00. This is r214068 through
214074.
r214075 was auto-triggered, as the build master was back online before it
landed.
Lucas
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 3:44 PM, Lucas Forschler wrote:
>
> I will ensure all commits that happen during transition get st
I will ensure all commits that happen during transition get staged on the new
server.
Lucas
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 2:52 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
> Are you making the subversion server readonly meanwhile?
>
> It's not acceptable for our infrastructure to be down and letting
> people commit rand
Are you making the subversion server readonly meanwhile?
It's not acceptable for our infrastructure to be down and letting
people commit random things into the repository.
- R. Niwa
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Ling Ho wrote:
> Hello WebKit developers:
>
> We are continuing our transitionin
Hello WebKit developers:
We are continuing our transitioning of webkit.org servers today and
tomorrow. Between 3pm and 4pm Pacific, we will be moving
build.webkit.org. Please email us at ad...@webkit.org if you encounter
any issue with your build bots after the transition.
Thanks,
...
ling
_
O Mar, 07-03-2017 ás 20:07 -0500, Patrick Wright escribiu:
>
> However, in the source code of android. There is an implementation of
> Webkit show here: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/web
> kit/package-summary.html . it is just very slow and restrictive.
That's the Android WebVi
12 matches
Mail list logo