On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Geoffrey Garen gga...@apple.com wrote:
Anne, can you help me get those comments sent to the w3 list? I sent them
myself, but they seem to be held up or bounced?
Hey, I think they did make it, and Boris replied:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nlwrote:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20567 could use input
from the WebKit community, in particular DOM/JavaScript experts. I
recommend reading through
At first glance, updating the prototype as done by Gecko and IE is the only
sensible behavior.
I'm not sure I agree. See my comments in Bugzilla.
Anne, can you help me get those comments sent to the w3 list? I sent them
myself, but they seem to be held up or bounced?
Thanks,
Geoff
Note that WebKit re-uses the same Document after a call to
document.open(). I suspect we're unlikely to change that behavior
anytime soon.
Adam
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
Hi,
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20567 could use
Note that WebKit re-uses the same Document after a call to
document.open(). I suspect we're unlikely to change that behavior
anytime soon.
Do we know of any websites that depend on this behavior?
Geoff
___
webkit-dev mailing list
On Jan 24, 2013, at 6:20 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Note that WebKit re-uses the same Document after a call to
document.open(). I suspect we're unlikely to change that behavior
anytime soon.
We also keep the same Window (which it sounds like IE doesn't, since that's
cited as
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Geoffrey Garen gga...@apple.com wrote:
Note that WebKit re-uses the same Document after a call to
document.open(). I suspect we're unlikely to change that behavior
anytime soon.
Do we know of any websites that depend on this behavior?
I haven't tested this
7 matches
Mail list logo