On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 2:37 PM Alex Christensen
wrote:
> I’m also wondering why
> https://github.com/WICG/client-hints-infrastructure/blob/main/reliability.md#retry-limits
> says it should only retry GET requests. Is that just to avoid re-uploading
> large POST requests?
>
POST requests are
I’m also wondering why
https://github.com/WICG/client-hints-infrastructure/blob/main/reliability.md#retry-limits
says it should only retry GET requests. Is that just to avoid re-uploading
large POST requests?
> On Apr 6, 2021, at 10:02 AM, David Benjamin wrote:
>
> Hi Alex, thanks for the
(Oops, couldn't post to the list without being subscribed. Apologies for
the duplicate mail to anyone who got both!)
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 1:02 PM David Benjamin wrote:
> Hi Alex, thanks for the comments! Responses inline.
>
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 9:04 PM Alex Christensen
> wrote:
>
>> I’m
I’m glad to see ALPS and bytes sent over the network used instead of additional
reliance on state on the client. We don’t want to introduce a super cookie on
the client, and we want to minimize breakage when a user agent decides to
remove state to prevent tracking.
I can’t say I’ve followed
Hi there,
Complimentary to
https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2021-January/031673.html,
Chromium intends to ship the ALPS + ACCEPT_CH HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 frames
portions of the Client Hints reliability proposal, and we would like to
solicit WebKit's position.
As mentioned in the
5 matches
Mail list logo
