Re: [webkit-dev] Subject: Windows CE port in WebKit: status, future work

2014-08-29 Thread Alex Christensen
; Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Subject: Windows CE port in WebKit: status, future > work > > Hi Ossy, > > removing Windows CE code sounds ok to me, since it shouldn't be a big deal to > restore it from SVN if it becomes useful again. > If it's ok, I

Re: [webkit-dev] Subject: Windows CE port in WebKit: status, future work

2014-08-29 Thread Yong Li
ebkit-dev] Subject: Windows CE port in WebKit: status, future work Hi Ossy, removing Windows CE code sounds ok to me, since it shouldn't be a big deal to restore it from SVN if it becomes useful again. If it's ok, I'll check the source code and post a patch in one of the next weeks? --

Re: [webkit-dev] Subject: Windows CE port in WebKit: status, future work

2014-08-29 Thread Patrick Gansterer
Hi Ossy, removing Windows CE code sounds ok to me, since it shouldn't be a big deal to restore it from SVN if it becomes useful again. If it's ok, I'll check the source code and post a patch in one of the next weeks? -- Patrick On 29.08.2014, at 13:42, Osztrogonác Csaba wrote: > Hi, > > Pat

Re: [webkit-dev] Subject: Windows CE port in WebKit: status, future work

2014-08-29 Thread Osztrogonác Csaba
Hi, Patrick Gansterer írta: On 31.01.2014, at 22:10, Anders Carlsson wrote looks like the last legitimate commit to the Windows CE port was on November 3rd November 2013, almost 3 months ago. What's the minimum upstream interval for downstream fixes to show ongoing activity? I also seem

Re: [webkit-dev] Subject: Windows CE port in WebKit: status, future work

2014-01-31 Thread Anders Carlsson
On Jan 31, 2014, at 1:36 PM, Patrick Gansterer wrote: > On 31.01.2014, at 22:10, Anders Carlsson wrote > >> looks like the last legitimate commit to the Windows CE port was on November >> 3rd November 2013, almost 3 months ago. > > What's the minimum upstream interval for downstream fixes to

Re: [webkit-dev] Subject: Windows CE port in WebKit: status, future work

2014-01-31 Thread Alex Christensen
I was also wondering how the new requirements for svg and accelerated compositing affected the wince port. Alex Christensen > On Jan 31, 2014, at 2:36 PM, Patrick Gansterer wrote: > > On 31.01.2014, at 22:10, Anders Carlsson wrote > >> looks like the last legitimate commit to the Windows CE

Re: [webkit-dev] Subject: Windows CE port in WebKit: status, future work

2014-01-31 Thread Patrick Gansterer
On 31.01.2014, at 22:10, Anders Carlsson wrote > looks like the last legitimate commit to the Windows CE port was on November > 3rd November 2013, almost 3 months ago. What's the minimum upstream interval for downstream fixes to show ongoing activity? > I also seem to remember that there’s no

[webkit-dev] Subject: Windows CE port in WebKit: status, future work

2014-01-31 Thread Anders Carlsson
Hi floks, looks like the last legitimate commit to the Windows CE port was on November 3rd November 2013, almost 3 months ago. I also seem to remember that there’s no version of MSVC for Windows CE that can handle the C++11 features that we now use in WebKit. (Correct me if I’m wrong on this!)