On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> On Jan 24, 2010, at 7:42 PM, David Kilzer wrote:
>>> It puts the information closer to where it's needed. The only down sides
>>> are that it's not necessarily easy to find (click o
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Nikolas Zimmermann <
zimmerm...@physik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
>
> Am 25.01.2010 um 05:07 schrieb Maciej Stachowiak:
>
>
>
>> On Jan 24, 2010, at 7:42 PM, David Kilzer wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, January 24, 2010 at 7:09:26 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>> I don't think we
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2010, at 7:42 PM, David Kilzer wrote:
>> It puts the information closer to where it's needed. The only down sides
>> are that it's not necessarily easy to find (click on the link of the
>> "Component:" label on any bug page)
Am 25.01.2010 um 05:07 schrieb Maciej Stachowiak:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 7:42 PM, David Kilzer wrote:
On Sun, January 24, 2010 at 7:09:26 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
I think deleting the areas of knowledge is a regrettable loss of
information. I
think it's helpful to give people at least a
On Jan 24, 2010, at 7:42 PM, David Kilzer wrote:
> On Sun, January 24, 2010 at 7:09:26 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
>> I think deleting the areas of knowledge is a regrettable loss of
>> information. I
>> think it's helpful to give people at least a few starting points for their
>> question
On Sun, January 24, 2010 at 7:09:26 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> I think deleting the areas of knowledge is a regrettable loss of information.
> I
> think it's helpful to give people at least a few starting points for their
> questions, because not everyone is going to be comfortable firing r
On Jan 24, 2010, at 2:02 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> I changed it for two reasons:
>
> 1) The old format wasn't scaling to the current team size. The page
> as become an unwieldy wall of text.
>
> 2) The old format emphasized the industrial affiliation of the team
> members, which seemed counter t
Looking at the old page, it is not an accurate source of chronology
information. :) However such is easy to gather from svn/git.
I wrote a script a while ago which shows you the latest commit by
everyone, but it would be about 2 lines of code change to make it show
you the first commit instead:
h
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> In the conversion process, I removed the "areas of knowledge"
> information because it was often out of date or provincial. svn
> blame, IRC, or social awareness is a more accurate way of figuring or
> who to ask about a particular piece of cod
I changed it for two reasons:
1) The old format wasn't scaling to the current team size. The page
as become an unwieldy wall of text.
2) The old format emphasized the industrial affiliation of the team
members, which seemed counter to a collegial project. The new format
emphasizes project role
I noticed that the "WebKit Team" wiki page changed significantly this past week:
http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/WebKit%20Team
I was curious about the reasons behind the change, and whether people
like the change.
--Chris
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit
11 matches
Mail list logo