Hi Nadav,
I agree with much of your assessment of the the proposed SIMD.js API.
However, I don't believe it's unsuitability for some problems
invalidates it for solving other very important problems, which it is
well suited for. Performance portability is actually one of SIMD.js'
biggest
Could this thread maybe be moved to es-discuss?
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
You are free to start such a discussion on es-discuss. I think it's useful for
the webkit community to be able to discuss what we think of the feature.
-Filip
On Sep 28, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
Could this thread maybe be moved to es-discuss?
We will probably bring it up on es-discuss once we’ve had a chance to discuss
it among WebKit folks.
- Maciej
On Sep 28, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
Could this thread maybe be moved to es-discuss?
___
webkit-dev
Dan, you say that SIMD.js delivers performance portability, and Nadav says it
doesn’t.
Nadav’s argument seems to come down to (as I understand it):
- The set of vector operations supported on different CPU architectures varies
widely.
- Executing vector intrinsics on processors that don’t
Hi Dan!
On Sep 28, 2014, at 6:44 AM, Dan Gohman sunf...@mozilla.com wrote:
Hi Nadav,
I agree with much of your assessment of the the proposed SIMD.js API.
However, I don't believe it's unsuitability for some problems
invalidates it for solving other very important problems, which it is
6 matches
Mail list logo