Re: [webkit-dev] [jsc-dev] Proposal: Using LLInt Asm in major architectures even if JIT is disabled

2018-09-21 Thread Yusuke Suzuki
Yeah, I'm not planning to enable LLInt ASM interpreter on 32bit architectures since no buildbot exists for this configuration. And we should make 32bit architectures JSVALUE64, so LLInt JSVALUE32_64 should be removed in the future. On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 2:33 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Th

Re: [webkit-dev] [jsc-dev] Proposal: Using LLInt Asm in major architectures even if JIT is disabled

2018-09-21 Thread Guillaume Emont
Quoting Yusuke Suzuki (2018-09-21 10:10:59) > Yeah, I'm not planning to enable LLInt ASM interpreter on 32bit architectures > since no buildbot exists for this configuration. I'm confused. Do you mean you don't want to enable LLint instead of CLoop, for the case when JIT is disabled on 32-bit arch

Re: [webkit-dev] [jsc-dev] Proposal: Using LLInt Asm in major architectures even if JIT is disabled

2018-09-21 Thread Filip Pizlo
> On Sep 21, 2018, at 9:44 AM, Guillaume Emont wrote: > > Quoting Yusuke Suzuki (2018-09-21 10:10:59) >> Yeah, I'm not planning to enable LLInt ASM interpreter on 32bit architectures >> since no buildbot exists for this configuration. > > I'm confused. Do you mean you don't want to enable LLin

Re: [webkit-dev] node-jsc: A node.js port to the JavaScriptCore engine and iOS

2018-09-21 Thread Yusuke Suzuki
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 6:09 PM Koby Boyango wrote: > Thanks for taking the time to look into the project :) > > Filip - I would love to. Should I create one bug for all of the patches, > or a bug for each patch? > Also, there is an existing bug that I've reported a while ago, but worked > around