On 24/11/2012, at 10:56 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
On Nov 23, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Andreas Kling akl...@apple.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Do we really think it's a good idea to add yet another implementation of
filters?
We already have generic, NEON-optimized and
Hi,
I was thinking for some time whether I should reply, as there was no
question in the mail, only an opinion. I still cannot say anything else
that I respect this opinion. I am sure the intent is to make WebKit
better, the same thing most of us want here. Dirk explained the technical
part (btw
Hi folks,
Do we really think it's a good idea to add yet another implementation of
filters?
We already have generic, NEON-optimized and WTF::ParallelJobs (which includes
generic, OpenMP and libdispatch backends) implementations of this code, and now
we're adding OpenCL too.
On the WebKit
On Nov 23, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Andreas Kling akl...@apple.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Do we really think it's a good idea to add yet another implementation of
filters?
We already have generic, NEON-optimized and WTF::ParallelJobs (which includes
generic, OpenMP and libdispatch backends)
Hi,
we start upstreaming some OpenCL optimizations into WebKit.
This is the master bug:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70099
Regards,
Zoltan
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
5 matches
Mail list logo