Re: [webkit-dev] WebKit + OpenCL

2012-11-26 Thread Dean Jackson
On 24/11/2012, at 10:56 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote: On Nov 23, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Andreas Kling akl...@apple.com wrote: Hi folks, Do we really think it's a good idea to add yet another implementation of filters? We already have generic, NEON-optimized and

Re: [webkit-dev] WebKit + OpenCL

2012-11-26 Thread Zoltan Herczeg
Hi, I was thinking for some time whether I should reply, as there was no question in the mail, only an opinion. I still cannot say anything else that I respect this opinion. I am sure the intent is to make WebKit better, the same thing most of us want here. Dirk explained the technical part (btw

Re: [webkit-dev] WebKit + OpenCL

2012-11-23 Thread Andreas Kling
Hi folks, Do we really think it's a good idea to add yet another implementation of filters? We already have generic, NEON-optimized and WTF::ParallelJobs (which includes generic, OpenMP and libdispatch backends) implementations of this code, and now we're adding OpenCL too. On the WebKit

Re: [webkit-dev] WebKit + OpenCL

2012-11-23 Thread Dirk Schulze
On Nov 23, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Andreas Kling akl...@apple.com wrote: Hi folks, Do we really think it's a good idea to add yet another implementation of filters? We already have generic, NEON-optimized and WTF::ParallelJobs (which includes generic, OpenMP and libdispatch backends)

[webkit-dev] WebKit + OpenCL

2012-11-21 Thread Zoltan Herczeg
Hi, we start upstreaming some OpenCL optimizations into WebKit. This is the master bug: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70099 Regards, Zoltan ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org