Hi,
As we're still to have discussion on our side, I can't speak for us as a group,
only individually.
I agree with Fujii-san that from our use-cases turning off JIT seems reasonable.
However, I do also think regardless of what happened with that, we should make
sure that we get bots set up
26, 2023 3:18:36 PM
To: Kirsling, Ross
Cc: Fujii Hironori ; Brent Fulgham
; Mark Lam ; WebKit Development
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Proposal on retiring JIT on Windows
The reason is that the patch is reverted because it broke Windows DFG. This is
not acceptable to us since we have no EWS bots
Yusuke Suzuki via webkit-dev
> Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2023 7:23:04 AM
> To: Fujii Hironori ; Brent Fulgham
> ; Mark Lam
> Cc: WebKit Development
> Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Proposal on retiring JIT on Windows
>
>> How about LLInt? LLInt has some Windows specific code.
with consideration of the EWS
situation itself?
Ross
From: Yusuke Suzuki via webkit-dev
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2023 7:23:04 AM
To: Fujii Hironori ; Brent Fulgham
; Mark Lam
Cc: WebKit Development
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Proposal on retiring JIT on Windows
How about LLInt
> How about LLInt? LLInt has some Windows specific code.
> Can I revert the change if the JSC team breaks Windows port even though we
> have no EWS nor maintainers?
I think, ultimately, we cannot guarantee that it is working given that there is
no EWS bots running tests on Windows, it means it
It sounds reasonable. I don't object to removing Windows JIT support.
How about LLInt? LLInt has some Windows specific code.
Can I revert the change if the JSC team breaks Windows port even though we
have no EWS nor maintainers?
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:52 AM Yusuke Suzuki via webkit-dev <
6 matches
Mail list logo
