Re: [webkit-dev] QtWebkit vs GtkWebkit

2010-04-28 Thread Phoenix Revived
From: Evan Martin e...@chromium.org To: Phoenix Revived phoenixrevi...@yahoo.com Cc: Chinmaya Sn chinm...@gmail.com; webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org Sent: Tue, April 27, 2010 10:30:22 AM Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] QtWebkit vs GtkWebkit On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Phoenix Revived

Re: [webkit-dev] QtWebkit vs GtkWebkit

2010-04-27 Thread Phoenix Revived
. Cheers, ---AK From: Chinmaya Sn chinm...@gmail.com To: Phoenix Revived phoenixrevi...@yahoo.com Cc: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org Sent: Sun, April 25, 2010 1:33:05 PM Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] QtWebkit vs GtkWebkit I don't see this in Windows (Using latest arora

Re: [webkit-dev] QtWebkit vs GtkWebkit

2010-04-27 Thread Phoenix Revived
To: Phoenix Revived phoenixrevi...@yahoo.com Cc: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org Sent: Sun, April 25, 2010 1:36:55 PM Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] QtWebkit vs GtkWebkit http://dooble.sf.net has this only on windows, on linux it is working good. maybe a windows specific problem. Do others work on windows? On Sun

Re: [webkit-dev] QtWebkit vs GtkWebkit

2010-04-27 Thread Evan Martin
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Phoenix Revived phoenixrevi...@yahoo.com wrote: Yes, I have tried this on several versions of Ubuntu, including Lucid. I don't have Windows machine so I can't try that. There is not a single instance of a QtWebKit browser (or my own snippet of QtWebKit code)

Re: [webkit-dev] QtWebkit vs GtkWebkit

2010-04-25 Thread Chinmaya Sn
I don't see this in Windows (Using latest arora 0.10.0). Are you using Linux? On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Phoenix Revived phoenixrevi...@yahoo.comwrote: After a frustrating number of hours, I finally discovered a problem with QtWebkit (and all browsers derived from it: Arora, Konqueror,

Re: [webkit-dev] QtWebkit vs GtkWebkit

2010-04-25 Thread Max
http://dooble.sf.net has this only on windows, on linux it is working good. maybe a windows specific problem. Do others work on windows? On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Phoenix Revived phoenixrevi...@yahoo.com wrote: After a frustrating number of hours, I finally discovered a problem with