For now I changed the wording to remove the claim about an explicit request by
the CSS WG:
[[
* Standards citizenship. The CSS Working Group is considering requesting that
implementors remove support for vendor prefixed featuresonce the specifications
of the features reach a certain level of
Thanks!
Adam
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
For now I changed the wording to remove the claim about an explicit request
by the CSS WG:
[[
* Standards citizenship. The CSS Working Group is considering requesting that
implementors remove support
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 21, 2012, at 4:30 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
That seems
On Sep 21, 2012, at 5:34 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
Yeah, obligation is probably too loaded a word. Here's some updated text:
[[
* Standards citizenship. Many W3C working groups, including the CSS
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
wrote:
That seems like a reasonable approach to gathering usage data
indirectly, so
[+Tab]
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 21, 2012, at 5:34 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
Yeah, obligation is probably too loaded a word. Here's some updated
6 matches
Mail list logo
