On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On May 15, 2012 10:53 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org wrote:
Given how little of std:: we actually use (since WTF is used instead
for
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
It appears to me using fully qualified names (e.g. std::max(~) at call
site) is far superior to using directive for individual symbols (e.g. using
std::max).
It sounds in general like a number of people have been in favor
On May 17, 2012, at 12:33 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
It appears to me using fully qualified names (e.g. std::max(~) at call site)
is far superior to using directive for individual symbols (e.g. using
On Tuesday 15 May 2012, Darin Adler wrote:
On May 15, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
To me it seems like an odd practice, so I would like to ask what original
rationale behind that style guideline is
Adding a list of using declarations like using std::min to the top of
On Tuesday 15 May 2012, Darin Adler wrote:
On May 15, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
The conflict is between isinf, isnan and std::isinf and std::isnan, but
the conflict only exists in C++11 when constexpr versions are
introduced.
We should try harder to come up with a
On Wednesday 16 May 2012, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
On Tuesday 15 May 2012, Darin Adler wrote:
On May 15, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
The conflict is between isinf, isnan and std::isinf and std::isnan, but
the conflict only exists in C++11 when constexpr versions
On May 16, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
there is another conflict which is entirely our own fault. It is between
WTF::bind and the new std::bind from C++11
We should find a good solution for this. I’d suggest talking with Anders
Carlsson about it.
-- Darin
On May 16, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On May 16, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
there is another conflict which is entirely our own fault. It is between
WTF::bind and the new std::bind from C++11
We should find a good solution for this. I’d
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Anders Carlsson ander...@apple.com wrote:
On May 16, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On May 16, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
there is another conflict which is entirely our own fault. It is
between WTF::bind and the
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Anders Carlsson ander...@apple.comwrote:
On May 16, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On May 16, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
there is another conflict which is entirely our own fault. It is
between WTF::bind and the
On May 16, 2012, at 12:47 PM, James Robinson wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Anders Carlsson ander...@apple.com wrote:
FWIW, I don't think we really need using directives for the std namespace -
the fully qualified name is short enough and I like the additional clarity
that we're
On May 15, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
To me it seems like an odd practice, so I would like to ask what original
rationale behind that style guideline is
Adding a list of using declarations like using std::min to the top of each
source file would give us another ongoing
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On May 15, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
To me it seems like an odd practice, so I would like to ask what
original rationale behind that style guideline is
Adding a list of using declarations like using
On May 15, 2012 10:53 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On May 15, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
To me it seems like an odd practice, so I would like to ask what
original rationale behind that
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On May 15, 2012 10:53 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org wrote:
Given how little of std:: we actually use (since WTF is used instead for
most things), what about just explicitly qualifying usages with std::
directly?
15 matches
Mail list logo
