Em ter, 18 de out de 2016 às 15:07, Carlos Garcia Campos
escreveu:
El mar, 18-10-2016 a las 13:29 +, tev...@gmail.com escribió:
[...]
> > It doesn't need to be just a wrapper, because to wrap the JSC API
> > you
> > can just use the existing API. As I said, this depends on how we
> > design
>
El mar, 18-10-2016 a las 13:29 +, tev...@gmail.com escribió:
[...]
> > It doesn't need to be just a wrapper, because to wrap the JSC API
> > you
> > can just use the existing API. As I said, this depends on how we
> > design
> > the value object for example, if we use a different subtype for
>
Em seg, 17 de out de 2016 às 14:24, Carlos Garcia Campos
escreveu:
> El lun, 17-10-2016 a las 12:37 +, tev...@gmail.com escribió:
> >
> >
> > Em seg, 17 de out de 2016 às 04:31, Carlos Garcia Campos > lia.com> escreveu:
> > > El lun, 10-10-2016 a las 01:19 +, tev...@gmail.com escribió:
>
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:19 PM, tev...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm thinking about creating GObjects to warap JSC objects. For
instance: GJSCContext wrapping JSContextRef, GJSCObject wrapping
JSObjectRef and so on. I implemented a POC of the API and a simple
client to make my intentions clearer. It'
El lun, 17-10-2016 a las 12:37 +, tev...@gmail.com escribió:
>
>
> Em seg, 17 de out de 2016 às 04:31, Carlos Garcia Campos lia.com> escreveu:
> > El lun, 10-10-2016 a las 01:19 +, tev...@gmail.com escribió:
> > > Hello, everyone.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Some background first: my name i
Em seg, 17 de out de 2016 às 04:31, Carlos Garcia Campos
escreveu:
> El lun, 10-10-2016 a las 01:19 +, tev...@gmail.com escribió:
> > Hello, everyone.
>
> Hi,
>
> > Some background first: my name is Estêvão and every now and the I try
> > to contribute to Gnome Web, AKA Epiphany. First time w
El lun, 10-10-2016 a las 01:19 +, tev...@gmail.com escribió:
> Hello, everyone.
Hi,
> Some background first: my name is Estêvão and every now and the I try
> to contribute to Gnome Web, AKA Epiphany. First time was back in
> 2010. After the migration of Epiphany to WebKit, it stopped
> ident