Hello everyone,
wocommunity.org finally have a brand new look! Thanks to the efforts
of one of our community member, Sophiacom (www.sophiacom.fr).
Everything is much cleaner now, especially the Screencasts page.
More stuff is coming soon in the Community section : personal and
I have a direct action that runs from a curl job, but I would like to be able
to run the same job as a quartz job. Somehow I can not seem to find the magic
combination, as mailing from the DA works perfect, but when I call the DA from
a quartz job, the whole thing fails.
Does anyone have a
Nice Job!
With Kind Regards,
Dennis Gaastra,
Chief Technology Officer,
WEBAPPZ® Systems, Inc.
On 2010-02-01, at 4:35 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Hello everyone,
wocommunity.org finally have a brand new look! Thanks to the efforts of one
of our community member, Sophiacom
The biggest things you lose is the built in load balancing and the
javamonitor. You will need to spawn your own instances and load
balance them externally. Deployment turns into a single war file that
is easy to do. It is much easier to deploy a war versus setting up a
wo deployment.
The
When you say you're running the DA using a Quartz job, I'm guessing they're
both running in the same application and you're using Quartz to send an http
request. If that's the case, the most likely cause for your fault is that
you're not running with concurrent request handling enabled, thus
Thanks for the reply Dov.
Apparently Glassfish has a very nice GUI, so I understand it will replace
JavaMonitor nicely. However, I have no idea if mod_servlet allows for load
balancing.
Why is a war file easier to deploy than a woa?
And we don't gain anything platform-wise, WO runs fine on
On Feb 1, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Dov Rosenberg wrote:
The biggest things you lose is the built in load balancing and the
javamonitor. You will need to spawn your own instances and load
balance them externally.
That seems like a rather big drawback.
Deployment turns into a single war file
Resurrecting the Is FrontBase Dead?!!? thread...
I reported a rather minor bug in 4.x last Friday. It was fixed as of
Monday morning and they gave me a patched version to download.
They are definitely still very much in the game, they've just been busy.
Chuck
On Jan 7, 2010, at 4:55
The biggest things you lose is the built in load balancing and the
javamonitor. You will need to spawn your own instances and load balance them
externally.
That seems like a rather big drawback.
Indeed. I have however not checked out how this is handled by Glassfish. I
imagine there must
Is it true that the electronic licenses for Version 4 are the same as those for
Version 5? Thanks.
With Kind Regards,
Dennis Gaastra,
Chief Technology Officer,
WEBAPPZ® Systems, Inc.
On 2010-02-01, at 11:17 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Resurrecting the Is FrontBase Dead?!!? thread...
I
Besides, FrontBase just plain rocks. It does nothing besides just being there
and working exactly as it should.
- hugi
On 1.2.2010, at 19:17, Chuck Hill wrote:
Resurrecting the Is FrontBase Dead?!!? thread...
I reported a rather minor bug in 4.x last Friday. It was fixed as of Monday
Assuming you are using Wonder and WO 5.4, how do you do a rollover with a
wo:imagebutton?
Thanks in advance,
Johnny
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Politics was our biggest motivator. Our software is deployed on customers
servers and it was not an option to install a WO runtime everywhere. Its not
ideal but deploying in a Tomcat type environment seems to work pretty well
even when our app is scaled to pretty high loads
Dov
On 2/1/10 2:51
Merci Pascal.
But I want to add: a big round of applause for Pascal who makes a tremendous
job for the WOCommunity. Everybody knows that the community would be harmless
without the contributors to Wonder, the mailing list, ...
But today is the Pascal day ;-)
Philippe
PS: Aline, our graphic
Bravo to both of them. This has been a big improvement to the site.
Thank you!
On Feb 1, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Philippe Rabier wrote:
Merci Pascal.
But I want to add: a big round of applause for Pascal who makes a
tremendous job for the WOCommunity. Everybody knows that the
community would
Wow -
Great site! I never knew there existed all those videos. Very timely as I learn
wonder and ajax.
Thanks
On Feb 1, 2010, at 6:35 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Hello everyone,
wocommunity.org finally have a brand new look! Thanks to the efforts of one
of our community member, Sophiacom
Those videos were there for a long time, but only in the podcasts
feed. The plan is to allow people to upload podcasts (or at least the
URL to a podcast) themselves so that people don't have to wait after
me :-)
Wow -
Great site! I never knew there existed all those videos. Very timely
It is really great to see the community support. Well done, everyone!
David
On 1-Feb-10, at 2:40 PM, Philippe Rabier wrote:
Merci Pascal.
But I want to add: a big round of applause for Pascal who makes a
tremendous job for the WOCommunity. Everybody knows that the
community would be
The design is pretty nice! I like it.
But you still couldn't get rid of that defensive slogan on the Why WO? page.
It should say Because it rocks!. Not mention any other stuff ... This whole
page is so negative. I'd say that needs some serious rewrite ...
cug
On 1. Feb, 2010, at 4:35 AM,
On 02/02/2010, at 11:43 AM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
The design is pretty nice! I like it.
But you still couldn't get rid of that defensive slogan on the Why WO?
page. It should say Because it rocks!. Not mention any other stuff ... This
whole page is so negative. I'd say that needs some
I would, but ... I'm not a native english speaker and it shows. It shows quite
often especially when I write something. I'll come up with something and will
send it to a group for discussion, though.
cug
On 1. Feb, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
On 02/02/2010, at 11:43 AM, Guido
Le 10-02-01 à 19:43, Guido Neitzer a écrit :
The design is pretty nice! I like it.
But you still couldn't get rid of that defensive slogan on the Why
WO? page. It should say Because it rocks!. Not mention any other
stuff ... This whole page is so negative. I'd say that needs
some
It think the facts are good, but you are right: from a sales point of
view it looks at it from the wrong direction.
As a quick example,
But it’s in Java!
Yes, it’s Java, but it’s not J2EE. You don’t have to deal with EJB,
J2EE containers, Struts and the like. WebObjects uses Java for its
Oh, my ...
That's why my first idea was to say Chunk, please take a look ;-) Seriously,
I can invest some time tonight, take a closer look from a different angle and
we can discuss that.
cug
On 1. Feb, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
It think the facts are good, but you are right: from
Is it possible to get at the server name without a request/context? It
doesn't seem likely but I thought it worth asking.
Right now I'm storing it at the application level when the first request
is made. Alternatively, it can be handled by a property. Both of those
seem extremely inelegant
On 02/02/2010, at 12:03 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
Oh, my ...
That's why my first idea was to say Chunk, please take a look ;-)
+1 (and for using quoted prose such as, So says Chunk :) lol
Seriously, I can invest some time tonight, take a closer look from a
different angle and we can
As someone who had to “fight”, often losing, battles for the use of
WO in actual projects I would recommend rewriting this page by stating
why WO is a great choice on its own (i.e. why it rocks as technology)
regardless of which particular development environment one happens to
be coming
On 02/02/2010, at 12:27 PM, Haris Pobric wrote:
As someone who had to “fight”, often losing, battles for the use of WO in
actual projects I would recommend rewriting this page by stating why WO is a
great choice on its own (i.e. why it rocks as technology) regardless of which
particular
On 1-Feb-10, at 4:58 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Le 10-02-01 à 19:43, Guido Neitzer a écrit :
The design is pretty nice! I like it.
But you still couldn't get rid of that defensive slogan on the
Why WO? page. It should say Because it rocks!. Not mention any
other stuff ... This whole page
Le 10-02-01 à 20:27, Haris Pobric a écrit :
As someone who had to “fight”, often losing, battles for the use of
WO in actual projects I would recommend rewriting this page by
stating why WO is a great choice on its own (i.e. why it rocks as
technology) regardless of which particular
On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:53 PM, David Holt wrote:
On 1-Feb-10, at 4:58 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Le 10-02-01 à 19:43, Guido Neitzer a écrit :
The design is pretty nice! I like it.
But you still couldn't get rid of that defensive slogan on the
Why WO? page. It should say Because it rocks!.
BTW, Gordon Belray (a fellow Canuck) submitted a cool idea for the
front page :
http://www.fineart.utoronto.ca/wo/
The gears would be links to internal and external pages, so it would
be a startup page for everyone.
I'm also looking at adding a search box on the Web site, that
Before I'm putting the final touches on the organization and member
profiles on wocommunity.org, I would like to know what people would
like to put in those profiles. So I added two pages in the wiki that
describes what those profiles currently have :
Has anyone used SIF, http://www.sifinfo.org, in a WebObjects project?
Thanks, Steve
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your
On Feb 1, 2010, at 7:32 PM, Steve Peery wrote:
Has anyone used SIF, http://www.sifinfo.org, in a WebObjects project?
No, but I have worked with this http://www.acord.org/Pages/
default.aspx which seems at least superficially similar. The Design
by Committee aspect can yield a schema
I am looking into linking an existing WO Application into a SIF Zone
Integration Server. If someone has been down that path, they could make my life
easier. If not, I will probably start asking some more specific questions in
the near future.
Steve
On Feb 1, 2010, at 10:39 PM, Chuck Hill
If you can't get it from the request headers, then storing it or using
a property are the only options.
Chuck
On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Jon Nolan wrote:
Is it possible to get at the server name without a request/context?
It doesn't seem likely but I thought it worth asking.
Right now
On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:27 PM, Haris Pobric wrote:
As someone who had to “fight”, often losing, battles for the use of
WO in actual projects I would recommend rewriting this page by
stating why WO is a great choice on its own (i.e. why it rocks as
technology) regardless of which particular
Does anyone knows a good index bot in Java (last time I used a bot, it was
good old ht://dig)? I'm playing with Lucence Nutch but if somebody have a
better alternative, I'm all ears.
just use google site search ... i think it might be free if you allow ads?
ms
On Feb 1, 2010, at 6:27 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Before I'm putting the final touches on the organization and member
profiles on wocommunity.org, I would like to know what people would
like to put in those profiles. So I added two pages in the wiki that
describes what those profiles
40 matches
Mail list logo
