.
Thanks!
James
On Mar 18, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
This may be off topic, but it is really on topic. If you have not caught up
with this video series by Crockford on Javascript, it is well worth watching:
http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/javascript-ajax/crockford
This may be off topic, but it is really on topic. If you have not caught up
with this video series by Crockford on Javascript, it is well worth watching:
http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/javascript-ajax/crockford-on-javascript-the-complete-series/
which is about far more than just Javascript.
Hey, I'm treasurer of Yesfanz:
http://www.yesfanz.com/
On another note, we tell students about EOF as the ultimate ORM system,
alongside Active Record as a simpler example, but there seems now so little
appropriate information on the web and all of Apple's is stamped Legacy
Document. In fact
Anyone doing NoSQL DBs?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NoSQL
http://nosql-database.org/
My worry is it's just the OODB people coming back putting 'evil uncle'
hierarchies and networks back into DBMSs. But Cassandra seems to be doing good
work (well that's a matter of debate) at Facebook. And we
Not only way off topic, but meaningless as well. May as well have posted a link
to a porn site.
There are still those who try to justify C/C++ because they are the fastest.
Ruby and Python are trying to do much different things and are just scripts to
organize the overall task. They aren't
. Mail find picks up all words like restart, restrict, etc. ERRest seems
to be first mentioned Nov 2007, but I know we were talking about REST before
that - I first read Fielding's thesis sometime that year.
On 16 Nov 2010, at 12:33, Ian Joyner wrote:
On 16 Nov 2010, at 12:23, Chuck Hill wrote
, at 8:50 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
I agree with this too. Problem or fixed complexity must be dealt with
somewhere in the system, and arguments often abound as to where that
should be done (almost always without people recognizing that fact). I
wrote on that recently too:
http
in the same way. The problem is that you can't just make a suck ratio,
because everyone has different values for suck coefficients. You could
probably make a suck linear combination, though.
ms
On Nov 16, 2010, at 5:26 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
Now that I think of it, I'm not so sure I do agree
, to suggest some alternate
avenues of exploration toward the design of new kinds of languages.
On 17 Nov 2010, at 09:35, Ian Joyner wrote:
On 17 Nov 2010, at 06:49, Pascal Robert wrote:
Le 2010-11-16 à 14:42, Antonio Petri a écrit :
Of course, the sad reality is that our industry loves
On 17 Nov 2010, at 11:43, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Nov 15, 2010, at 8:43 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
One student in his experience report mentioned that professional programmers
should spend extra time on making their stuff usable and easily installable
if they are going to expect people to use
-11-16 à 20:55, Chuck Hill a écrit :
On Nov 16, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
On 17 Nov 2010, at 11:43, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Nov 15, 2010, at 8:43 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
One student in his experience report mentioned that professional
programmers should spend extra time on making
(Not that I'm doing any WO these days, but I still like to follow.)
One thing that has always worried me about scalability is keeping the per user
application state on the server in WOSession. Knowing more about REST now,
this is very unrestful and not stateless, which means will not scale.
On 16 Nov 2010, at 11:35, David LeBer wrote:
On 2010-11-15, at 7:09 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
(Not that I'm doing any WO these days, but I still like to follow.)
One thing that has always worried me about scalability is keeping the per
user application state on the server in WOSession
On 16 Nov 2010, at 12:02, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Nov 15, 2010, at 4:53 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
On 16 Nov 2010, at 11:35, David LeBer wrote:
On 2010-11-15, at 7:09 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
(Not that I'm doing any WO these days, but I still like to follow.)
One thing that has always
On 16 Nov 2010, at 12:23, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Nov 15, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
The moral of the story is that every technology sucks, so you might as well
just build it fast so it can suck in production faster and you can move on
with your life.
I hate it when he is right.
.
The moral of the story is that every technology sucks, so you might as well
just build it fast so it can suck in production faster and you can move on
with your life.
ms
On Nov 15, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Nov 15, 2010, at 4:53 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
On 16 Nov 2010
changed in 30 years in terms
of how we actually solve problems.
ms
On Nov 15, 2010, at 8:50 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
I agree with this too. Problem or fixed complexity must be dealt with
somewhere in the system, and arguments often abound as to where that should
be done (almost always without
On 16 Nov 2010, at 14:40, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Nov 15, 2010, at 5:27 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
On 16 Nov 2010, at 12:02, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Nov 15, 2010, at 4:53 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
On 16 Nov 2010, at 11:35, David LeBer wrote:
On 2010-11-15, at 7:09 PM, Ian Joyner wrote
On 16 Nov 2010, at 14:52, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Nov 15, 2010, at 6:51 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
That's a good distinction about quickly. Seems most get a kick from the
first learning of something to get it quickly happening. Hence
lowest-common-denominator languages like BASIC become popular
Interesting take from Matt. A few things concern me.
1) He says Executive quips always make headlines. Surely, what executives say
should be based on what their technical people have told them and be well
thought out. That is the mark of an agile environment where technical people
are treated
On 23 Oct 2010, at 01:07, Joel M. Benisch wrote:
MacApp is still in use by some, and it goes back to Object Pascal days (late
1980s?).
Wow, still around.
C and C++ have been around for how long?
And they are the horrors of all horrors. Strange how the worst technologies
have the longest
Glad to see these pages are being improved. We have been covering ORMs with our
students this week and EOF is our reference model. But it is a bit difficult to
talk about EOF without giving the feeling of out-of-date stuff. Having seen
Pascal's post the other day, I thought of these wiki pages,
:08 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Ian, Ian ... it's these threads that await you ;-)
On 04/02/2009, at 12:42 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
On 04/02/2009, at 2:01 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
object.method( argument );
This is the worst use of white space, as explained on this page on
the correct use
Hi Miguel,
On 05/02/2009, at 11:54 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
On 2009/02/05, at 00:44, Ian Joyner wrote:
Modern programming languages should both be like natural language
(easy to read) and have formalized grammars (BNF, denotational
semantics, etc, etc). Alas most languages in use today
On 04/02/2009, at 2:01 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
Sorry about the off-topic, but Eclipse is driving me nuts with
this. I like to leave a space before and after everything between
parenthesis, like:
object.method( argument );
This is the worst use of white space, as explained on this
On 11/08/2008, at 2:17 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
Clearly. This part But then iTunes uses WebObjects (which I
believe is old school Java-based) and MobileMe uses SproutCore
(which is all dressed up in Ajax-y 2.0 objectivity) clearly shows
the author has no idea of what he's talking
On 22/07/2008, at 7:19 AM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 21.07.2008, at 15:13, Lachlan Deck wrote:
one of the things that frustrates me about generics is working with
collections.
Just that one? Generics are the worst thing since Windows 3.11 ... I
try to keep my code clean and add generics
On 07/02/2008, at 3:41 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008, at 4:06 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
On 07/02/2008, at 7:37 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
From Art:
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/arnold/archive/2005/06/generics_consid_1.html
Hey, I used to work with David Holmes, many a happy hour spent
On 07/02/2008, at 9:20 AM, James Cicenia wrote:
Hmmm,
And to think I learned that method of qualifier creation from either
a book or Apples own docs years ago.
But mixing the objects in the List was confusing me, which is what
Johann said about just using Object
That's probably why
On 07/02/2008, at 7:37 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008, at 12:33 PM, James Cicenia wrote:
Well I have decided to to start going to 1.5 now.
this is something I do all the time:
NSMutableArray args2 = new NSMutableArray();
args2.addObject(portfolio);
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 21, 2008, at 21:00, Ian Joyner wrote:
What I am trying to do is have a button show a pressed form when
clicked, and an unpressed form when a user moves the mouse out.
I'm trying to do this by swapping the image 'src' attribute in
JavaScript. However, to get
On 23/01/2008, at 6:27 AM, David Holt wrote:
Eclipsepreferencesjavacode styleformat
hit the Edit... button and go to the line wrapping tab...
Thanks David, but that's not what I want (I think). Maybe it is buried
under Eclipse's complexity. Playing with these settings made no
difference
I think you want Edit/Refactor/Format, assuming you have the component
open in Mike's component editor - it's beautiful!
Ian
On 23/01/2008, at 5:34 AM, Thomas wrote:
Is there any way to make Eclipse wrap the text instead of
disappearing off the right hand side?
I have thousands of
it into 3.3, but I don't remember seeing it.
Just did another search and I can't find it in 3.3.2 either. Thanks
for the info. So that's 5673 to Eclipse and 1 to Xcode! Maybe Alice
Cooper will play some Rick Wakeman on PlanetRock.
Ian
On Jan 22, 2008, at 6:55 PM, Ian Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED
What I am trying to do is have a button show a pressed form when
clicked, and an unpressed form when a user moves the mouse out.
I'm trying to do this by swapping the image 'src' attribute in
JavaScript. However, to get the input field which is generated by the
WOImageButton, I'm using
On 21/01/2008, at 8:11 AM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Am 20.01.2008 um 22:02 schrieb Lachlan Deck:
Well I suppose it's about time I took a serious look at D2*, so
what do you suggest is the best path?
Glad you asked :) You can either pay me for my D2W course or you can
go to amazon and grab the
On 21/01/2008, at 8:55 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jan 20, 2008, at 1:39 PM, David LeBer wrote:
On 20-Jan-08, at 4:35 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jan 20, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
If someone needs more help than is available via a tutorial,
that's what a mailing list is for. Then
Wow, I sure touched off some fiery debate here – sorry guys. If I can
summarize the two main points:
1) WO 5.4 acts differently to 5.3 by adding a ?wosid=... part on the
end of a URL.
That is bad and will cause all sorts of compatibility problems and
existing systems to break.
2) It
;
Pierre
--
Pierre Frisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 18, 2007, at 10:59, Edgar Klein wrote:
Hi,
On 16-Dec-07, at 10:47 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
I have this little bit of code to invoke a direct action to
download a file:
public String download_link () {
return context
Ian
On 18/12/2007, at 4:35 AM, Susanne Schneider wrote:
Hi Ian,
From: Ian Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, I think this is not the problem – printing out the
result from this function shows no ?wosid on the end:
Video_library (Video_library.java:download_link:1184) - result is /
cgi- bin
I have this little bit of code to invoke a direct action to download a
file:
public String download_link () {
return context ().directActionURLForActionNamed
(download_video,
new NSDictionary
String, Object (
I'd try this question on a Java group. (Or use the real thing, Eiffel,
if you want contracts properly integrated with a real OO language!)
Ian
On 11/12/2007, at 1:27 PM, Mr. G Brown wrote:
The wikipedia lists 12 DBC tools for Java:
Java, using
1- iContract2,
2-Contract4J,
3-jContractor,
/
Computers and other electronic devices not allowed.
We may allow Ian Joyner to reminisce about Eiffel over a few glasses
of wine in the evening.
Sounds like a great deal. Great countryside, great wine, great bunch
of people. Close to everywhere else in Europe, go to the UK in summer,
back
us to this point.
Ian
On 15/11/2007, at 3:28 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
I have to very much agree with what Robert says below. This year has
been incredibly frustrating (apart from meeting Chuck and a whole
lot of you other great people at WWDC) and part of it is the
movement in the WO space
I'm not really sure what they are measuring (is there an explanation
page), percentages or absolutes, interest or actual sales, compared to
what, etc?
Ian
On 15/11/2007, at 9:17 AM, Joe Moreno wrote:
It looks like WWDC 2005 put a little zip into WebObjects:
I have to very much agree with what Robert says below. This year has
been incredibly frustrating (apart from meeting Chuck and a whole lot
of you other great people at WWDC) and part of it is the movement in
the WO space. OK, we had a large JC project which we now have someone
doing it in
On 15/11/2007, at 3:50 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
A bit OT...
On 15/11/2007, at 3:28 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
Then I looked at Ruby on Rails. I have to agree with Robert that
this is one elegant beast and is fun (whereas the more I look at J
EE, the more I am filled with dread
Not much going on on wo-talk, so I may as well put these suggestions
here (WO is actually quite a difficult thing to come up with a sound
bite for). I think we should be more directly saying what WO does in
as few words as possible. So what I can think of is:
WebObjects: Your Enterprise on
On 07/11/2007, at 9:45 AM, Thomas wrote:
Give Quentin a break. He's a Queenslander. English is not his native
tongue.
8^)
And just so the rest of the list understands that this was a
traditional good-humoured Australian insult, I was born in Brisbane,
the capital of Queensland, the most
On 07/11/2007, at 2:00 PM, Q wrote:
On 07/11/2007, at 12:33 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
BTW, to continue the improvement in the grammar of the sentence:
If you're not using WebObjects, you're doing things the hard way.
Shouldn't that be If you'se ain't usin WebObjects, yous're doin
thins
On 31/10/2007, at 3:30 AM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
I am sure I will come up with other ideas, some even more useless
than some of these, when I actually have a Leopard system. We'll
see. I am open to suggestions, question, jibes, innuendoes,
catcalls, or anything short of insults. No, insults are
On 30/10/2007, at 12:27 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Hi there,
On 30/10/2007, at 11:34 AM, Ken Foust wrote:
To this Great Community:
For seasoned developers the passing of WO is not a big deal.
Passing? 5.4 just came out.
However for novice and part timers it is like a tragedy. There
Did I miss something? Is .net open source?
As for Stephane's comment and IBM is everywhere with WebSphere,
there's a lot of lobbying inside to kill WO
that has always been the case with IBM and now Microsoft lobbyists -
the problem is that those technologies need a lot more people to make
for eating.
Le 3 oct. 07 à 02:51, Ian Joyner a écrit :
I agree – calling for open source is not thinking different,
it's thinking the same. This industry is too full of popular
solutions that don't really address the real problem. I think
that's what Steve means when he says think different
I agree – calling for open source is not thinking different, it's
thinking the same. This industry is too full of popular solutions
that don't really address the real problem. I think that's what Steve
means when he says think different, address the problem and the need.
I don't think open
You don't need open source if a closed-source library is sufficiently
documented. One of the reasons for the popularity of open source is
that the open-source proponents don't want to provide documentation,
just give you the source and say you go work it out.
Of course there are other very
Bertrand Meyer (the originator of DbC, and properties I believe, as
in an NDA feature I can't talk about) has studied and written about
nulls (or Voids as he calls them):
http://se.ethz.ch/~meyer/publications/joop/void.pdf
Ian
On 09/09/2007, at 3:11 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Sep 8, 2007,
On 07/09/2007, at 7:44 PM, Rainer User wrote:
Hi Folks,
i am new at the webobjects-dev maillist and new to webobjects too.
I am reading the white printed book Webobjects 5, Web
Applications, from Apple, it was included in the Webobjects
Package of my Webobject-Box.
On Page 84 i found an
We probably can't discuss this publically, being under NDA, but I
can't get the examples under 5.4 to build. I'm following the
instructions in the Examples/JavaWebObjects/GettingStarted.rtf. I can
install the databases fine. However, the ant does not work because
there is no build.xml file
I had exactly this problem last week:
http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WONDER/Troubleshooting
It looks in your case that you might have initialized you frontbase
framework before Wonder.
Ian
On 17/07/2007, at 8:23 PM, Edgar Klein wrote:
Hi,
as I posted last time, I moved a
, especially in the API, and lack of comprehensible
documentation (typical standards body problem).
http://www.acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Contentpa=showpagepid=396
Ian
On 10/07/2007, at 11:05 AM, Ian Joyner wrote:
On 10/07/2007, at 4:37 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
This came out in the latest issue of ACM
On 10/07/2007, at 4:37 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
This came out in the latest issue of ACM Queue. It is a very good
article on API design issues and mistakes. It is a bit long but I
think well worth reading:
http://acmqueue.com/rd.php?c.488
You can also get a free subscription to Queue. For
On 04/07/2007, at 4:53 PM, Sebastien Plisson wrote:
Hello,??Where can I find the Webobject tutorials written by an
enthusiast woman ?that I met at WWDC07 ???Thank you??Sebastien
Plisson??
I think you mean Janine Sisk. Her tutorial is available (with sample
code) here:
On 03/07/2007, at 5:20 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
On Jul 3, 2007, at 3:34 AM, Ian Joyner wrote:
I appreciate the effort to provide a better level of documentation
at the objectstyle confluence site. However, I'd have to say, I
like the look of the wikibook a lot better (even though
I appreciate the effort to provide a better level of documentation at
the objectstyle confluence site. However, I'd have to say, I like the
look of the wikibook a lot better (even though it wastes space on the
LHS). Is it possible to give a confluence site a better look, or is
this locked
We also have a large JC app, and I agree with everything Robert says.
It looks like we have about two years to get off JC. It works really
well, up to a point. I think the Apple parts work well, and the Swing
parts not so well – table cells being a case in point.
Maybe there was a time
I had the same problem yesterday. I was working at home and had to
set up WOLips with Eclipse. Had worked fine the previous few times I
did it, but this time new project templates weren't showing up
(WOApplication, WOnderApplication, etc). I'll try it again against
the stable build.
We use Nib to Swing. It's a difficult technology to use and Swing
does not help – apparent bugs in JC are really bugs in Swing, which
Apple has no control over. Three-tier client-server does not seem to
have caught on as expected (maybe I should read the Client/Server
Survival Guide, which
On 23/06/2007, at 12:36 AM, Robert Walker wrote:
Interesting (somewhat off-topic) discussion. I just wanted to
inject that I've recently been writing some Ruby code, which uses
the underscore convention for identifiers. At first it felt really
strange using the underscore identifier
On 23/06/2007, at 1:02 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
You guys need to learn LaTeX! One of the little cool details is
that it actually handles the bigger space after the periods
automatically. :)
Ah yes, an innovation from another ex-Burroughs programmer! :-)
Ian
On 22/06/2007, at 7:27 PM, Paul Lynch wrote:
On 22 Jun 2007, at 03:39, Eric Robinson wrote:
Whether you like it or not, infix caps, or camel case, are part of
the Official Code Conventions of the Java Programming Language,
seen at http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/
So the fact that it is a convention should prevent anyone from
pointing out that it is a bad convention? Methinks this emperor has
no clothes!
On 22/06/2007, at 3:49 PM, Timmy wrote:
On Jun 21, 2007, at 9:11 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
On 22/06/2007, at 12:39 PM, Eric Robinson wrote:
On Jun
On 22/06/2007, at 6:43 AM, David LeBer wrote:
On 21-Jun-07, at 2:15 PM, Sigurður E. Vilhelmsson wrote:
I figure I need to build an NSArray and populate it with the values
from the Course_description table and then use that to populate the
course_descriptionID in the Course table, but exactly
On 22/06/2007, at 12:39 PM, Eric Robinson wrote:
On Jun 21, 2007, at 7:29 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
On 22/06/2007, at 6:43 AM, David LeBer wrote:
On 21-Jun-07, at 2:15 PM, Sigurður E. Vilhelmsson wrote:
I figure I need to build an NSArray and populate it with the values
from
On 22/06/2007, at 2:50 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
* Maybe I'm just a troglodyte ... Heck, I still type two spaces
after periods most of the time (Note: I went back and took them out
on this post :) ).
Thank heavens for that. So you admit you do like horizontal
space. I can
Hi Janine,
Yes we do it for sales demos, etc. We just load the developer tools
on client machine and can run it from there. It's a bit of a pain
though, and perhaps some better gurus on this list can give you a
simpler, more minimalistic way.
Ian
On 06/06/2007, at 9:00 AM, Janine Sisk
Another Mark Twain moment:
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/m/marktwain141773.html
Ian
On 05/05/2007, at 5:18 AM, Don Lindsay wrote:
Hello;
I know that Apple had decided last year to deprecate/stop
development of Web Objects.
Has there been any change in the status of
On 04/05/2007, at 1:11 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
On May 2, 2007, at 1:59 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
I have found that you only need a symbolic link in the /Library/
WebServer/Documents/WebObjects folder:
ln -s /Library/WebObjects/MyApp.woa MyApp.woa
That way you never have to worry about copying
On 04/05/2007, at 10:48 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
I would recommend specifically linking WebServerResources.
Otherwise someone can just download your jar files and
potentially worse, your Properties files which might have
passwords in them. It is MUCH safer to create MyApp.woa/Contents
On 03/05/2007, at 3:42 AM, Scott Winn wrote:
MyApp.woa made it successfully to /Library/WebObjects/Applications
but there is no sign of WebServerResources in the /Library/
WebServer/Documents/WebObjects. (Need to move MyApp.woa to the
folder manually, Problem 1)
I have found that you
Hi Chuck (and others who might see what this problem is),
On 27/03/2007, at 3:09 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Hi Ian,
On Mar 25, 2007, at 9:43 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
I'm getting a crash in the following code:
public boolean is_unassigned () {
// editingContext
I'm getting a crash in the following code:
public boolean is_unassigned () {
// editingContext ().refaultObject (this);
log.info (is_unassigned + this.groups ());
boolean result = true;
java.util.Enumeration Group_Member e = groups
mention to
peak people's interest.
Thanks
Ian Joyner
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com
There is one issue I have found – Iterator does not cause faults to
be loaded. Thus if you use:
Iterator EOGenericRecord t = an_array.iterator ()
you will get nothing, whereas the Enumeration form works fine:
Enumeration EOGenericRecord e = an_array.objectEnumerator ()
So
On 20/03/2007, at 2:57 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Mar 18, 2007, at 10:11 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
Hi Peter,
What you say makes sense. Maybe, because my dependent entity does
not have any further cascades, I'm not seeing anything else being
brought into memory (maybe it's already there).
I
On 20/03/2007, at 10:48 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Mar 19, 2007, at 4:20 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
On 20/03/2007, at 2:57 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Mar 18, 2007, at 10:11 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
What you say makes sense. Maybe, because my dependent entity
does not have any further cascades, I'm
PRIMARY_KEY, which
relates to the owned records which have OWNER_KEY. To do the delete
cascade, I would think that DELETE FROM owned table WHERE OWNER_KEY
= PRIMARY_KEY of owner would suffice.
Have I got something set up wrong here, or am I missing something?
Thanks
Ian Joyner
Sportstec
does this because it needs to bring all the EO's into
memory to process the delete rules specified in your EOModel.
Regards
Peter
Ian Joyner wrote:
I just noticed in my system that if I have the cascade delete rule
set on a to-many relationship in EOModeler that the deletes happen
one
hacking, where your software development
practices are so good, you're not afraid to try things out.
Ian
On 06/03/2007, at 4:31 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
When I open a NIB file in IB (latest version 2.5.4 and WO 5.3.3), I
get a dialog:
Interface Conversion
The interface file
I have just found that the statement:
UPDATE table SET POSITION = value
gives the error:
SQL ERROR - [position 13, near '' in 'ATE MEMBER SET POSITION =']
update error: SET expected but not found.
The following works:
UPDATE table SET OTHER_FIELD = value, POSITION = value
Seems that
mentioned by Ian.
--
Sam Barnum
360 Works
http://www.360works.com
415.865.0952
On Mar 4, 2007, at 4:43 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
This is what I do. You need to attach a little bit of JavaScript
to all your text fields:
function check_enter (event) {
// Stop user logging out when
This is what I do. You need to attach a little bit of JavaScript to
all your text fields:
function check_enter (event) {
// Stop user logging out when return or enter pressed.
// We need a better way of attaching them to the + button.
var code = document.layers?
Simple question - where do you get it?
There is no link to any download at:
http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/
webobjects531formacosxserver104.html
a fact I have complained about on the It's good, but link.
Since I have been using Xcode 2.4 for ages which comes with
WebObjects
On 12/02/2007, at 11:01 AM, Art Isbell wrote:
On Feb 11, 2007, at 1:48 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
Simple question - where do you get it?
It should be available through Software Update on OS X Server
systems with WO 5.3.1 Deployment installed just as WO 5.3.1 should
be available through
On 12/02/2007, at 11:21 AM, Art Isbell wrote:
On Feb 11, 2007, at 2:09 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
I tried that on one of our servers that had 5.3.1 deployment, but
Software Update reported no software needed update on that machine.
I suspect that 5.3.1 deployment is the latest even though
On 23/01/2007, at 2:32 PM, Thomas wrote:
In some jobs I use other technologies, usually for political
reasons, and quote appropriately. But when the customer has no
opinion, I choose WebObjects.
Is there a case to be made then why WO is still better than JEE5? I
think one of Apple's
On 23/01/2007, at 7:51 AM, Andrew Satori wrote:
I find this whole argument about Eclipse entertaining, but not
productive :-).
Eclipse doesn't address my original concer, and that was WOBuilder
(or a successor). Arguing the merits of an editor is a no-win
argument, think emacs versus vi
I have searched around but can't find any papers on direct
comparisons of WebObjects vs J2EE. Does anyone know of sources that
address such questions as:
Comparison of features
Ease of development/deployment
and the biggy: PERFORMANCE
Also does anyone have any feelings about performance of
Please don't post your messages to both WO-Dev and Omni list. All
people end up with is duplicate messages, since most people receive
both groups.
On 09/01/2007, at 10:51 AM, Dev WO wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to isolate the issue with this, but I just can't
even get an error...
So I
Just hit this problem myself, since I was changing Enumeration to the
more elegant Iterator and wanted to use generics (which should avoid
runtime type checking, but I'm not sure if it can since you can't put
a matching generic type on the NSArray and for backward
compatibility, Java does
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
