There have been many mails on WO passing. First of all it didn't until
now, and it won't for some time (at least that is what I think). But
anyway. With the introduction of Webobject 5.4 and Leopard we've seen
two things:
1. Java isn't top priority anymore (look at Java 6 not being
There have been many mails on WO passing. First of all it didn't
until now, and it won't for some time (at least that is what I
think). But anyway. With the introduction of Webobject 5.4 and
Leopard we've seen two things:
1. Java isn't top priority anymore (look at Java 6 not being
And by the way, the move from Xcode + WOB + EOM to Eclipse + WOLips +
EM is really no different than Apple's move from the old iMovie to
iMovie 08. The big point of contention is that it's neither a clear
upward or downward move. In some ways it's substantially better, in
some ways it's
On Oct 30, 2007, at 4:31 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
And by the way, the move from Xcode + WOB + EOM to Eclipse + WOLips +
EM is really no different than Apple's move from the old iMovie to
iMovie 08. The big point of contention is that it's neither a clear
upward or downward move. In some ways
What I would love to see is a simple download and install package
for WO developers.
The biggest issue with this is that someone has to host the extra 100+
meg installer for a bunch of leeches to download :) But anyone could
technically make a preinstalled bundle.
For example, the
To this Great Community:
For seasoned developers the passing of WO is not a big deal. However
for novice and part timers it is like a tragedy. There doesn't see
to be a solution out there that was so complete. You could just buy
Joshua Marker's book, build something and even make it
Ken,
When did WO die?
Alan
On Oct 29, 2007, at 6:57 PM, Q wrote:
The rumors of WO's death have been greatly exaggerated.
There may be a changing of the guard when it comes to the
development tools, but WO is most certainly still with us.
On 30/10/2007, at 10:34 AM, Ken Foust wrote:
The rumors of WO's death have been greatly exaggerated.
There may be a changing of the guard when it comes to the development
tools, but WO is most certainly still with us.
On 30/10/2007, at 10:34 AM, Ken Foust wrote:
To this Great Community:
For seasoned developers the passing of WO is
On 29.10.2007, at 19:01, Alan Ward wrote:
When did WO die?
Years ago. Only nobody noticed ...
cug, zombieing around ...
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list
For seasoned developers the passing of WO is not a big deal.
If WO is dead, then my wife really deserves an explanation of what
I've been up to all these months.
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev
Hi there,
On 30/10/2007, at 11:34 AM, Ken Foust wrote:
To this Great Community:
For seasoned developers the passing of WO is not a big deal.
Passing? 5.4 just came out.
However for novice and part timers it is like a tragedy. There
doesn't see to be a solution out there that was so
Well, it is what it is. Can't be helped now. But there's still a lot
of help available... I'd say even more than before. If you need a
visual editor, then there are numerous gui html editors out there
that could serve you well. Granted, they'll not be an integrated
solution.
Not only that,
my thoughts exactly I've got 8 years of 'splainin' to do :-)
Alan
On Oct 29, 2007, at 7:54 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
For seasoned developers the passing of WO is not a big deal.
If WO is dead, then my wife really deserves an explanation of what
I've been up to all these months.
ms
On 30/10/2007, at 12:27 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Hi there,
On 30/10/2007, at 11:34 AM, Ken Foust wrote:
To this Great Community:
For seasoned developers the passing of WO is not a big deal.
Passing? 5.4 just came out.
However for novice and part timers it is like a tragedy. There
On 30/10/2007, at 1:07 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
Not only that, but pro-WOBs / anti-WOLs keep talking like the
current state is the forever state. Anyone who follows WOLips
knows that story is far from over ... Just a week or two ago we had
the WOB-ish Display Group editor submitted, which
15 matches
Mail list logo
