_wo...@codeferous.com> wrote:
>
>> WebObjects - the set of frameworks used by Apple == Not Abandonware
>> WebObjects - the set of frameworks used/enhanced/patched by the
>> community through Wonder == Not Abandonware
>> WebObjects - the set of frameworks supplied
On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 15:54:37 -0400
David LeBer <dleber_wo...@codeferous.com> wrote:
> WebObjects - the set of frameworks used by Apple == Not Abandonware
> WebObjects - the set of frameworks used/enhanced/patched by the
> community through Wonder == Not Abandonware
> We
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: webobjects-dev-ow...@lists.apple.com
> Subject: Re: Abandonware???
> Date: October 5, 2015 at 6:02:01 PM EDT
> To: p...@me.com
>
> You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message has
> been automatically reject
Hi Paul,
"Although such software is usually still under copyright, the owner may not be
tracking or enforcing copyright violations."
Apple doesn’t need to release the copyright to turn WebObjects into
Abandonware. I see no problem if we declare WebObjects as Abandonware and Appl
I was reading this Wikipedia article.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abandonware
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abandonware>
Would the list agree that WebObjects is now abandonware?
"Definitions of "abandoned" vary, but in general it is like any item that is
aban
WebObjects - the set of frameworks used by Apple == Not Abandonware
WebObjects - the set of frameworks used/enhanced/patched by the
community through Wonder == Not Abandonware
WebObjects - the set of frameworks supplied by Apple as a supported
product == Abandonware
My opinion.
D
Paul Yu
Hi D
Because of
> WebObjects - the set of frameworks supplied by Apple as a supported product
> == Abandonware
The community responded with
> WebObjects - the set of frameworks used/enhanced/patched by the community
> through Wonder.
This was described in the wiki as possib
I think Apple has abandoned WebObjects outside of Apple but not inside. Just my
personal opinion
Alan
> On Oct 2, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Paul Yu <p...@mac.com> wrote:
>
> I was reading this Wikipedia article.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abandonware
>
> Would the
utside of Apple but not inside. Just
> my personal opinion
>
> Alan
>
>
> On Oct 2, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Paul Yu <p...@mac.com <mailto:p...@mac.com>>
> wrote:
>
>> I was reading this Wikipedia article.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abandonware
IMO, yes. Fits perfectly.
I think we can all agree, it isn’t Swift
http://www.zdnet.com/article/swift-goes-open-source-at-apple-wwdc-2015/
:-/
On Oct 2, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Paul Yu <p...@mac.com> wrote:
> I was reading this Wikipedia article.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/w
nk Apple has abandoned WebObjects outside of Apple but not inside. Just
>> my personal opinion
>>
>> Alan
>>
>>
>> On Oct 2, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Paul Yu <p...@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I was reading this Wikipedia article.
>>>
, at 21:01, Alan Ward <aw...@apple.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think Apple has abandoned WebObjects outside of Apple but not
>>>inside. Just my personal opinion
>>>
>>> Alan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 2, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Paul Yu <
ard <aw...@apple.com
>>> <mailto:aw...@apple.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think Apple has abandoned WebObjects outside of Apple but not inside.
>>> Just my personal opinion
>>>
>>> Alan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 2, 2015,
te:
>>>>
>>>> I think Apple has abandoned WebObjects outside of Apple but not
>>>> inside. Just my personal opinion
>>>>
>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 2, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Paul Yu <p...@mac.com
>> Apple silently killed WebObjects and abandoned it's users roughly a decade
>> ago (in a somewhat less-than-honest manner (Floop-de-diddity-doo You,
>> Apple)).
>>
>> But the community marches on. I’m constantly impressed by how this community
>> survives and keeps what's essentially a dead
d.
>>>
>>> You know, now that we have a direct flight between Iceland and
>>>Montreal,
>>> your conversion to Cayenne would be a great presentation about WOWODC
>>> 2016. :-)
>>>
>>>> - hugi
>>>>
>>>>
16 matches
Mail list logo
