+1
On Jul 4, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Hugi Thordarson h...@karlmenn.is wrote:
Those who do not understand WebObjects are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.”
On 3. júl. 2015, at 20:04, Chuck Hill ch...@gevityinc.com wrote:
There are probably only so many ways to do it right, so after they
Those who do not understand WebObjects are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.”
On 3. júl. 2015, at 20:04, Chuck Hill ch...@gevityinc.com wrote:
There are probably only so many ways to do it right, so after they have
exhausted doing it wrong you end up with a familiar pattern. One thing
There are probably only so many ways to do it right, so after they have
exhausted doing it wrong you end up with a familiar pattern. One thing that I
find amusing after years of how fantastic JS is because it has no types, that
there is now so much interest in stronger typing. This whole
http://www.webcodegeeks.com/javascript/angular-js/angular2-hello-world/
Is it just me, or does Angular2 (apparently a huge re-write from v1)
written with TypeScript (a typed superset of Javascript) look like, oh
I don't know, WebObjects and Java? :-)
Strange days indeed.
- ray
