Has anyone else had this problem? Create a new Java-Client project,
just the simplest one possible, build and run it and you get:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Controller class not found:
Test.client.TestInterfaceController
at
and then in a subclass provide more fine-grained
access control for checking CRED operations.
Has anyone else implemented such a JC security scheme? Does this
sound like the right way to go?
Thanks
Ian Joyner
Sportstec
___
Do not post admin requests
:26, Ian Joyner wrote:
We are doing three-tier but with Nib files and Interface Builder.
It should certainly be possible to write the Swing yourself, but
it seems like it would be less painful to generate the Swing code
from an interface creation app. There are probably quite a few
On 17/11/2005, at 10:45 AM, Ben Trumbull wrote:K.Here's the secret:EOSharedEditingContexts are NOT EOEditingContexts.That's a great secret because the EOSharedEditingContext doc says:Class EOSharedEditingContextjava.lang.Object com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOObjectStore
Wish there were more documentation! There only seems to be the Apple
book coupled with their examples, which don't usually get as complex
as one would like. Try questions on the group because there are a few
of us JC developers around. Basically, you'll probably hit and have
to solve a lot
One of the times it occurs is when the server is too slow in
responding. On a development system this can be due to exceeding 100
TPM, which stalls. Look for such a message in the run log.
HTH
Ian
On 24/11/2005, at 4:39 PM, Eric Stewart wrote:
I'm seeing the following error repeatedly in
That's what it does for me, so it's not just your installation. I
think what it means is that if you change the Association kind, the
previously made connections don't make any sense.
Ian
On 10/12/2005, at 3:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm developing an Java Client interface
of course have unique primary keys wrt Artifact. This does not seem
to have any adverse impact on the operation of the DB. Should I be
worried, or define the model in a better way? Should this be reported
as a bug to Apple?
Thanks
Ian Joyner
Sportstec
the table for the abstract
super class will never have any rows in it, it needs to be created.
I don't think this is a bug, just an artifact of varying
implementations of a database. Kind of makes you long for a
standard, doesn't it?
Chuck
On Dec 13, 2005, at 4:59 PM, Ian Joyner wrote
contents instead of placing the cursor at the end?
Or is this a Swing bug or a Java Client bug?
Thanks
Ian Joyner
Sportstec
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com
Since EO does not have an equivalent boolean type (strange since it's
there in Java), I just use Char (1) and put in 'T' or 'F' in the
table with functions 'f: char (1) - boolean' to do the cast (Casts
are just functions, but like many things, C syntax obscures this
fact). Seems to be the
Is it possible to find out the serial number of a server (OS X or
Losedows) that a WO application is running on?
The reason I need to do this is to register an application for a
customer to only run on one machine, so perhaps there are other ways,
prewritten frameworks to do this.
Thanks
Try Desktop Applications with Java Client in WebObjects Java Client
Programming Guide.
On 28/01/2006, at 7:35 AM, John Huss wrote:
Is it possible to use my EnterpriseObjects classes and EOModel in a
regular Java application without any web interface?
How do I get a connection to the
list for foreign key and index
returns a whole lot of bogus hits, because every mail has the word
index in it!)
Thanks
Ian Joyner
Sportstec ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects
I have a Java-Client application that has several panels in a single window in a master-detail interface. In order to speed the opening of a window, I have a mechanism whereby only display groups shown on a panel are fetched. When the user clicks a tab, the display groups on the newly displayed
Perhaps someone from Apple could clarify, but between Cocoa and WO,
you are talking two very different things (as I'm sure you
appreciate), so I don't think there is any reason to change how you
develop Java-client apps with IB (I have a large project in it).
The statement does say
the
InputStream stuff, but if you have cached set, EO gives you no
indication as to what is being read.
Thanks
Ian Joyner
Sportstec
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev
On 11/02/2006, at 1:46 AM, Arturo Perez wrote:
Ian Joyner wrote:
Some questions on the 'Reading InputStream into byte data': These
seem quite slow, is there an optimization that could be done?
Obviously, I'd like to avoid it altogether. Is there a way of
finding out which particular
On 11/02/2006, at 4:17 AM, Geoff Hopson wrote:
Or maybe your model should have a 'status' field and avoid all that
nasty inheritence altogether. :-)
I probably agree that in this model, a status (state) field would be
better because you are looking at a single item that changes state
On 13/02/2006, at 4:09 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
Or maybe your model should have a 'status' field and avoid all
that nasty inheritence altogether. :-)
I probably agree that in this model, a status (state) field would
be better because you are looking at a single item that changes
On 14/02/2006, at 2:32 AM, Arturo Perez wrote:
Ian Joyner wrote:
On 13/02/2006, at 4:09 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
I and a new OO programmer and I *really* appreciate everyone's
advice on OO design!
In this case, these three part types have some very specific
differences
Primary keys seem to be the only things that EOModeler counts as unique. However, I want other columns in the DB to be unique, particularly 'usercode'. I have modified this with SQL: alter table USER column USERCODE set unique index;but this is like a low-level
On 14/02/2006, at 4:03 PM, Arturo Pérez wrote:
On Feb 13, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
On 14/02/2006, at 2:32 AM, Arturo Perez wrote:
Well, I think each has a (sorry for pun) different role.
Inheritance is really about identifying common properties and
putting them in one place
realizing it! (OK, I
have to reread the books on normalization everytime :-()
Ian
On 15/02/2006, at 3:01 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
On 15/02/2006, at 1:11 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Hello Ian,
On Feb 14, 2006, at 5:44 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
If I were to request a UNIQUE property in EOModeler, should
On 16/02/2006, at 1:25 AM, Arturo Perez wrote:
Ian Joyner wrote:
Thinking on it a little further and an afternoon walk (now I need
my afternoon nap), perhaps unique is not as high in the semantic
chain as we would like, since identifying candidate keys in
relations implies unique across
The problem I have found with flattened attributes is that they seem
to work fine for one thing but not for another. You have to test them
out on all four CRED operators (create, read, edit, delete). Often I
find that EO generates strange errors about inv paths not being found
when
(akin to the can't have spaces in
project paths, that killed off using WO for me for a long time), but
thanks for any suggestions.
Ian Joyner
Sportstec
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list
Does anyone know if and how you can print from a D2JC app?
Thanks
Ian Joyner
Sportstec
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your
get to make the hopefully
informed decisions that others will follow.
janine
On Mar 12, 2006, at 5:08 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
Now what are your real requirements? I'll throw in another thought
for you – don't bother with an SCS at all! For small companies and
small projects they really
that nicely is VMS but even
it only supports 32,000 versions of a file :-)
-arturo
On Mar 12, 2006, at 8:08 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
Now what are your real requirements? I'll throw in another
thought for you – don't bother with an SCS at all! For small
companies and small projects they really
EOTemporaryGlobalID: 0 0 -64 -88 0 7 0 0 -15 83 1 0 0 0 1
9 -9 81 65 -102 58 -107 -26 -116 has been changed by another client
Thanks
Ian Joyner
Sportstec
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev
On 15/03/2006, at 6:56 AM, Janine Sisk wrote:
No problem, just use your SCC package to compare the current code
to the last known good version and see what has changed.
Which just proves my point, because that's exactly what I did without
an SCC package! Would I like to avoid part of my
On 16/03/2006, at 12:43 AM, Arturo Perez wrote:
Ian Joyner wrote:
Just to play devil's advocate a bit more, I'd still like to see
such functionality built into a development environment – a system
editor, rather than the primitive text editor-based environments
of today. The problem I
because some guru told them that that's the way it had to be
done, and many are just as cantankerous and contrary as a couple of
your posts have been.
Regards,
Jerry
On Mar 14, 2006, at 11:59 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
On 15/03/2006, at 6:56 AM, Janine Sisk wrote:
No problem, just use your SCC
A really big thanks to Jerry and Chuck for expending a lot of effort
on looking through this and debabating it. I'm trying to respond in
as few short posts as possible, because I've probably already bored
people to tears.
On 16/03/2006, at 2:31 AM, Jerry W. Walker wrote:
Hi, Ian,
I
Thanks Chuck,On 16/03/2006, at 4:41 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:Now, that does not explain how this is happening on a newly inserted object. Hence, I will resort to wild speculation. ;-)1) A snapshot for the object has been registered on the server under this temporary ID prior to this save and some
Thanks again Chuck and Jerry,
On 16/03/2006, at 8:01 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Have you turned on EOAdaptorDebuggingEnabled to check the
generated SQL? It looks like EOF may be attempting to write a
record that contains itself recursively and determines on the
second recursion that the
(Sorry if this is a repost, but it has not turned up in my inbox from
last night.)
I'm intermittently getting the error:
Cannot obtain globalId for an object which is not registered in any
editingContext
I see quite a few have run into this one over the years and have read
all those
.
Is there anyway an old session might not be cleaned up OK?
Thanks
Ian
On 28/03/2006, at 11:22 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Hi Ian,
On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
(Sorry if this is a repost, but it has not turned up in my inbox
from last night.)
The list has been a bit unstable the last few
:40 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
Thanks for the reply Chuck. I don't think there is a problem with
the Person save code, because it also fails on the Member save
code (although member is a subclass of person, the controllers are
different and the Member controller does not post a notification
On 06/04/2006, at 9:39 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Apr 4, 2006, at 8:20 PM, Jerry W. Walker wrote:
Hi, John,
I do my development work on a Mac, not on Windows,
Ya outta get out more Jerry. There is a whole world out there! :-P
Woo hoo, a platform beatup on WebObjects!
so I'm guessing
On 06/04/2006, at 11:17 PM, Jerry W. Walker wrote:
Hi, Chuck Ian,
On Apr 5, 2006, at 8:33 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
No, Jerry. Windows is not UNIX. It's really, really not UNIX.
Trust me on this.
Now that sounds like a great feature of Windows, except not
implies or (get your
I don't think you can tell anything much from a UML diagram, except I
have seen them used to prove a faulty design was the one to go with
over a correct design. About the only good things out of UML were
David Harel's state charts (which were added because they existed
before UML) and the
I've also installed 2.3 for both our Web-based and Java-client
projects which are running without any problems. They seem to be
running a lot faster, but we have also upgraded to WO 5.3.1 from
5.2.4 and J2SE 5.4 (which is probably the main performance gain,
although I know this is not
NOTE: I posted this to the Wonder-disc group twice but neither turned
up, so am posting here. Sorry.
Decided I would get the latest Wonder build which is 2-June-2006,
updating from around 29-March-2006. Running the project now says
class JDBCAdaptor not found (this project does not use a
NOTE: I posted this to the Wonder-disc group twice but neither turned
up, so am posting here. Sorry.
I'm just converting our second project to Wonder. The first project
is just a regular WO application running in browser. This project is
a Java-Client app. In the controller classes, which
On 20/06/2006, at 6:04 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Hi there,
On 15/06/2006, at 8:22 PM, John Larson wrote:
objectEnumerator does work. I didn't even think that that would
be a different implementation except for Iterator's remove()
method. Oh well, just trying to obey Sun's advice about
thoughts as to what is preventing EO from generating the PKs?
Thanks
Ian Joyner
Sportstec
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your
software (not the WO stuff) being used at the WOrld Cup:
http://www.bbcworld.com/content/template_clickonline.asp?
pageid=665co_pageid=3
ms
On Jun 21, 2006, at 3:28 AM, Ian Joyner wrote:
Good evening Mr Phelps,
I have put a usercode and password on our database to restrict any
kind of access
On 29/06/2006, at 8:46 AM, Scott Henderson wrote:
First, Thank You to all who have responded and participated to my
post.
Good information.
Tim, I am particularly interested in your newbie experience. As I
mentioned, OO programming is going to be a new experience for me.
I like the
On 03/07/2006, at 7:27 AM, Mr. G Brown wrote:
Yes,
A VerifiedPatient would be a subclass of a PatientAlias (from a
Java perspective); they would have many properties in common,
methods, validations, etc. A VerifiedPatient would link (from a SQL
perspective) to many PatientAliases, and
On 04/07/2006, at 8:03 AM, Art Isbell wrote:
On Jul 3, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Theodore Petrosky wrote:
While adding a key to WO builder, it says that the
variable will be defined as:
protected string stringname;
however they come in as:
public string stringname;
If when you add a key in WO
On 10/07/2006, at 3:35 AM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Am 09.07.2006 um 17:26 schrieb Guido Neitzer:
So, I have to correct myself: For me this is a bug in EOF, because
it should fail in BOTH cases because the attribute name is not
reachable from ALL entities I want to fetch. It just shouldn't work.
Hi Guido,
I'm a bit uneasy about your design having as types CONTACT, USER,
LIST and then CONTACT_LIST and USER_LIST. This does not suggest
inheritance, but (for those who have used languages with genericity)
a generic type. Thus you would have a single type LIST with a generic
type
problems in the EOModel design (I do too much
Java-client stuff, where this pops up) due to interdependent
inheritance hierarchies.
Ian
On 10/07/2006, at 6:34 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 10.07.2006, at 2:34 Uhr, Ian Joyner wrote:
I'm a bit uneasy about your design having as types CONTACT
I just store booleans in a one character field (which you should
define as a protoype in EOModeler in the EOPrototypes entity as Value
Class NSString, Value Class (Java) String, external type char, width
1, in case this definition ever needs to change).
Then the code looks like:
Interesting, I ordered it from Amazon the other day, but then
realized the ship date of 18th Dec was holding up the rest of the
order, so cancelled it suspecting that a firm date would have to be
given. Also ordered Amit Singh's Mac OS X Internals from them, but
cancelled that when I
I know Chuck noticed in my code postings that I annotate all my
collections and enumerations with a generic label. For example:
NSArray /*[String]*/ string_array = new NSArray ();
Enumeration /*[String]*/ e = string_array.objectEnumerator ();
but this is just dumb
On 14/08/2006, at 6:57 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
P.S. One final thought. Given that Apple is deprecating the tools,
anyone want to guess how many WO developers at Apple use Xcode for
WebObjects? ;-)
You mean they have not been eating their own dog food?
Ian
On Aug 13, 2006, at 1:48
advantage of the new facilities.
On 10/08/2006, at 5:21 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
I know Chuck noticed in my code postings that I annotate all my
collections and enumerations with a generic label. For example:
NSArray /*[String]*/ string_array = new NSArray ();
Enumeration /*[String
So we'll just toss (I almost said 'chuck') out all our hardware
because the Web now runs magically on the ether. I get uneasy when
people use the word 'legacy' because it has become a coded word for
replacing tried-and-true technology that has become reliable over a
long period of time
On 15/08/2006, at 5:01 PM, Thomas wrote:
I think this is a great idea. Not being at WWDC, I have to guess
that this is now practical.
Ah, another geographically-challenged person.
It would be great if it brought the whole WO community together,
including Project Wonder, so that there was
On 16/08/2006, at 1:26 AM, Simon Mclean wrote:HiMy own personal suggestion would be for us to focus first on making the wiki the best damn WO resource it can possibly be, and to help out Mike with making WOLips the best damn plug-in it can be. Then take stock of how we are doing and add a few more
On 16/08/2006, at 11:18 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Aug 15, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
The last time I looked at the WOLips code, it was, um, er, not
very well commented.
comments ... comments ... nope, haven't heard of em.
LOL
Real developers don't have time to comment!
Agree
On 16/08/2006, at 12:24 PM, Dov Rosenberg wrote: Like usual the threads have been hijacked from their original purpose.Good point, I'll move the discussion here.On 16/08/2006, at 12:09 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:On Aug 15, 2006, at 6:55 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:On 16/08/2006, at 11:18 AM, Chuck Hill
On 16/08/2006, at 12:24 PM, Dov Rosenberg wrote: Like usual the threads have been hijacked from their original purpose. I just thought I would throw my 2 cents in about code comments: We have a team of 3 developers working on our application. Instead of having 1 person specialize in one area of
On 16/08/2006, at 1:09 PM, Dov Rosenberg wrote: I am an old fashioned programmer. I usually write comments to describe what I am GOING to do before I actually do the code. Then I just fill in the code. Helps me organize my thoughts better.Doesn't look old fashioned to me, just good practice. (Or
the commented out code in place for a release or two may add some size to the code but the time saved tracking down problems is much more important to us. Usually a defect related to a recent change is easily fixed by looking at the changes made. Dov RosenbergOn 8/15/06 11:16 PM, "Ian J
This thread is over on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] about getting OS
X and Cocoa into the enterprise space. I have suggested WO is the way
to go. Better WO heads might like to contribute.
Ian
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be
Excellent. Here are my suggestions: 1) I think the first paragraph
still sounds a bit daunting and needs to be something like simply
develop basic applications to highly-scalable, sophisticated
applications. That way you say - hey you can pick this up really
easily, which is how
On 22/08/2006, at 2:23 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Hi there,
On 15/08/2006, at 2:06 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
Reading up on this a bit more, I note that generics are
implemented, not by changing the JVM, but by 'type erasure'. The
upside of this is that programs using genericity are able to run
On 22/08/2006, at 6:53 PM, Tonny Staunsbrink wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 8:14 AM, Ian Joyner wrote:
On 22/08/2006, at 2:23 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Hi there,
On 15/08/2006, at 2:06 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
Reading up on this a bit more, I note that generics are
implemented, not by changing
Hi Ryan,
I'm using IB with Xcode all the time, have dragged entities from
EOModeler to IB, but not had these problems. (I skipped 2.2, went
straight from 2.1/5.2.4 to 2.3/5.3.1 and now 2.4/5.3.2). Did you try
2.4 on a clean machine, maybe there are problems with other files in
2.2. Also
On 23/08/2006, at 6:20 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 8:01 AM, Michael Warner wrote:
I found this post to be one of the most spot on. Senior WO
developers have stepped up on the list, post WWDC 2006. That is
both praiseworthy and
reassuring. Yet the fact remains that apart
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Ian Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Reusable translated button
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:09:46 +1000
To: WebObjects-Dev Apple webobjects
On 23/08/2006, at 10:12 AM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Am 23.08.2006 um 00:59 schrieb Jerry W. Walker:
they will save me that time and effort and make PW even more
available to the newbies (like me) who haven't yet bought into
Eclipse. The easy answer, of course, is for me to just take the
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ian Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Reusable translated button
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:13:22 +1000
To: WebObjects-Dev Apple webobjects-dev
Hi Mike (and all),Hate to be a pain, but this page says "Project Wonder 2.0". I gather you must have regenerated it on the latest 3.0 since the date at the bottom says 23 Aug 2006 and it includes your Ajax stuff.I'm glad you put this online because I had problems generating it from the wiki
).msOn Aug 23, 2006, at 9:38 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:Any answers appreciated, I don't expect Mike to have to answer this one, but the download docs are much appreciated. ___Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.Webobjects-dev mailing list
now - weird.
PS: Do you ever have weird screen refresh issues with java client?
Many of our windows open up, draw their widgets (text fields,
etc.), and then some of them randomly disappear... Annoying.
Thanks,
-Ryan
On Aug 22, 2006, at 6:02 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
Hi Ryan,
I'm using IB
Is your awakeFromInsertion code on the client or server side?IanOn 26/08/2006, at 7:56 AM, David Avendasora wrote:Hi all,Hi all. I'm working on an WO 5.3.1 Direct to Java Client application that deploys to Tomcat using a Servlet Single Directory Deployment (SSDD).I'm trying to set some default
Quite a bit of talk about Ruby, but I couldn't work out which message to follow up, so here is a new thread.According to Martin Fowler:Closures have been around for a long time. I ran into them properly for the first time in Smalltalk where they're called Blocks. Lisp uses them heavily. They're
this concept. Well, whatever makes programming more powerful (less verbose), yet easier at the same time..IanOn 28/08/2006, at 4:10 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:Quite a bit of talk about Ruby, but I couldn't work out which message to follow up, so here is a new thread.According to Martin Fowler:Closures
On 29/08/2006, at 4:04 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Aug 27, 2006, at 7:28 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
OK, I'm a little annoyed here because I find the whole concept of
'final' to be ridiculous.
I can see the use of this concept. For example, you may have a
legitimate reason for making your
On 29/08/2006, at 12:25 AM, Paul Lynch wrote:
I am in FULL agreement with David Avendasora's post, which I pruned
from here.
On 28 Aug 2006, at 14:59, Miguel Arroz wrote:
But think on all the other solutions out there. J2EE has tools?
As far as I know, no. Everyone uses third-party Java
On 29/08/2006, at 7:18 AM, David Sanchez wrote:
On Aug 28, 2006, at 5:05 PM, Paul Lynch wrote:
But the tools in .NET are completely integrated, very fast and
relatively mature.
What this tells us is that tools alone are not enough to make a
good product, you need a degree of
On 29/08/2006, at 6:00 PM, Marcin Lukasiak wrote:
On 29/08/2006, at 4:04 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Aug 27, 2006, at 7:28 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
OK, I'm a little annoyed here because I find the whole concept of
'final' to be ridiculous.
I can see the use of this concept. For example, you
On 30/08/2006, at 5:57 PM, Marcin Lukasiak wrote:
Private API are for framework/library/application implementator use
- you
should even know that there is any method names X when it's
private. Private
API's are private because implementators want to have some internal
structure that they
(I knew it was only a matter of time before white space between words was replaced by capitalization, like Microsoft's ugly underlines in Windows seems to have made their way into the larger world - it's either "open source" or hyphenated as in "open-source software": end moan, or should I say
On 12/09/2006, at 11:15 AM, Tom Marchand wrote:Is it possible that WO will suffer the fate of HyperCard? I hope not.Which was?I did think of the fate of MacApp, but I can think of reasons why WO is different.On Sep 11, 2006, at 8:34 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:(I knew it was only a matter of time before
to what I suggested that no one is allowed to comment! I hope it's the last.IanOn Sep 11, 2006, at 10:25 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:On 12/09/2006, at 11:15 AM, Tom Marchand wrote:Is it possible that WO will suffer the fate of HyperCard? I hope not.Which was?I did think of the fate of MacApp, but I can
I'm using WO 5.3.2 just fine with J2SE 5. However, I have seen no announcements saying that the previous non-compatibility statement has been removed, so it's caveat emptor. Works great with generics.IanOn 26/09/2006, at 4:28 PM, Michael Scott wrote: Does WebObjects work with J2SE 5.0 yet? I must
This sounds excellent and with praise from Chuck and James. My
questions are:
1) is this complementary to frameworks like Wonder, and GVCSiteMaker,
so I can use the best parts of each?
2) Does it do JavaClient (at least as far as EO goes)?
Anyway, I'll take a serious look at it, and
On documentation... looks really excellent, but the PDF Developing
Applications with WireHose (Mac OS X) has an old copyright notice:
Copyright copy;2000−2003 Bulldog Beach Interactive, Inc. It looks
from the first few pages the same as the HTML version. I just want to
check it's up to
I suspect PDF is not updated since I just found on p 6 under "WireHoseWOBuilderBindings" a reference to Project Builder, which has been changed to Xcode in the HTML version.On 15/11/2006, at 4:49 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:On documentation... looks really excellent, but the PDF "Developi
Just hit this problem myself, since I was changing Enumeration to the
more elegant Iterator and wanted to use generics (which should avoid
runtime type checking, but I'm not sure if it can since you can't put
a matching generic type on the NSArray and for backward
compatibility, Java does
I have searched around but can't find any papers on direct
comparisons of WebObjects vs J2EE. Does anyone know of sources that
address such questions as:
Comparison of features
Ease of development/deployment
and the biggy: PERFORMANCE
Also does anyone have any feelings about performance of
Please don't post your messages to both WO-Dev and Omni list. All
people end up with is duplicate messages, since most people receive
both groups.
On 09/01/2007, at 10:51 AM, Dev WO wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to isolate the issue with this, but I just can't
even get an error...
So I
On 23/01/2007, at 7:51 AM, Andrew Satori wrote:
I find this whole argument about Eclipse entertaining, but not
productive :-).
Eclipse doesn't address my original concer, and that was WOBuilder
(or a successor). Arguing the merits of an editor is a no-win
argument, think emacs versus vi
On 23/01/2007, at 2:32 PM, Thomas wrote:
In some jobs I use other technologies, usually for political
reasons, and quote appropriately. But when the customer has no
opinion, I choose WebObjects.
Is there a case to be made then why WO is still better than JEE5? I
think one of Apple's
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
