I am trying to run the example JavaClientLauncherdoes anyone have a quick fix for this?thanks kenBuilding target “JavaClientLauncher (Copied)” of project “JavaClientLauncher” — (1 error)JamToolExecution "JavaClientLauncher(Copied)" (1error) cd
What if WO Java is opensourced
WO ObjC is brought back to Mac.
Well probably no VM so everything would have to be Mac based.
But maybe not so bad to re-energize the enterprise!
thank - ken
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be
I made a blended background. it is a gif file
It shows up in wo builder and in the xcode template html file
i tried adding it with texture and drag and drop and it shows up
both ways
but it does not display on the webpage when you build the app
I have it added to the project and it is seeing
So you can't create a new WO project with Xcode 3.0
can you load 2.4 as well a use that for WO development?
if yes then what about the compiler - Use java 1.5 or 1.4
i cannot open EOModeler App or WO Builder
I am trying to avoid going to eclipse/WOLips
What say you experts
Thanks ken
If I am reading correctly are you saying that with Eclipse and WOLips
you have to manually write your HTML - now code generation as from
WOBuilder??
Another question: If Apple depreciated WOBuilder and EOModeler will
these tools be opensourced or just sent to the boneyard???
Using Leopard Eclipse WOLips - which is the database of choice. I
have heard postgres is the best of the opensource ones. But which one
works best with replacement tool for EOModeler?
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be
On Oct 29, 2007, at 9:52 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
I prefer FrontBase ... It's trivial to setup, runs very well, and
it's free. MySQL and PostgreSQL are obvious other choices as well.
ms
On Oct 29, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Ken Foust wrote:
Using Leopard Eclipse WOLips - which is the database
To this Great Community:
For seasoned developers the passing of WO is not a big deal. However
for novice and part timers it is like a tragedy. There doesn't see
to be a solution out there that was so complete. You could just buy
Joshua Marker's book, build something and even make it
Yes it is the passing of the tools and the ease of getting everything
to work and coupled with the integration that really hurts the
novice. One thing I fail to understand is, If Apple is going to kill
these tools why not just pass them on to the WO community here and let
you people
where they can find more info. Since most real projects consist
of reusable frameworks and applications that use them, I think a
tutorial should cover how to build a framework and add that dependency
to one of your apps.
That should be helpful for beginners.
Ricardo Parada
ken foust says
AMEN
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:16:52 -0400
From: Mike Schrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Regarding Final Note
To: WebObjects-Dev Mailing List webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
What I would love to see
Well I got rid of the giant cluster F leopard. reloaded clean disk
build of TigerXcodeWOopenbase10
everything works great. I am just amazed that you people screw
around with all this other stuff.
Matter of fact I am so amazed that perhaps you could list some
websites working on the net
Ringing in:
Speaking from a novice point of view. Even though I know most of
you are extremely talented not only at development but also at
systems admin, you should understand that you are on a plateau that
few will reach.
So if WO was buggy then at least it let someone develop
Mike,
If all is worked on and completed then I am very encouraged. I
really believe there is a true opportunity to have a complete Web Dev
Package. Also if you know Scott Keith from Openbase he will work
very well with you. Please don't forget WOBuilder as it is really
the key as I
Is there a world (County) database out there that one can download.
I have the lists and maybe I can just import to a app like eomodeler
or entity modeler
I haven't looked at that possibility because I know the real answer
is right here
Thanks - ken
I hold most WO developers in the higher level of Web Development.
This actually comes after many years in the recruiting industry.
So based on that premise.
1. Why can't you guys just tweak WObuilder and EOM to run on leopard??
2. Can one just load Xcode 2.3 on leopard and run all the
Hola
Lets face it. Apple had the best mousetrap with WO. They did not
maintain it and now have a big void
relying on opensource. No enterprise - Just bring on the Trinkets.
Pretty disgusting and still looking at this site once and a while -
Apple has created a nightmare - but they don't
This seems to take a shot at replacing Apple's WO as it has the GUI
and self coding features.
Please give me your comparative thoughts to WOlips
thanks ken
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing
WOW they have more shite in there than a 4 of july campground. No
books and when
you try the manuals you can't tell which technology they are talking
about.
It kind of gets back to my original point. WO was great because
although it ran on other platforms it was built
for mac and had good
Good now - He started with Netbeans when he was 5 yrs old
On May 21, 2008, at 6:42 AM, Don Lindsay wrote:
Soo how is the Dali Lama?
Don
On May 21, 2008, at 12:52 AM, Ken Foust wrote:
WOW they have more shite in there than a 4 of july campground. No
books and when
you try the manuals you
not only record it but please tell people where to go download it.
On Oct 13, 2009, at 2:51 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Unless I am mistaken, Travis Britt will be leading a discussion of
WO vs. Ruby on Rails as part of what we hope might be an ongoing
series of discussion regarding the
IMHO
You gurus need to put out a few really in-depth tutorials. Maybe each
could do a little piece. It is hard to sell something like WO without
a good way
for people to get in the loop. You may want to review Joshua'
Marker's book on WO which I thought was the absolute best for
I suspect if you don't pull together the best technology will die. I
still go back to apple depreciating the tools and dropping WO. It
would be a hell of a lot easier if they at least had it as a
option. They should have you guys go back and bring it up to speed
and then start reselling
tutorials should demonstrate the real way to use the technology !
On Oct 25, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
- A AjaxUpdateContainer component that have a string who shows the
number of chars typed (just like the Web Twitter client on twitter.com
)
personally, i wouldn't do this ...
From the outside looking in:
It appears to me as thought WO is on the end of life list. As good as it may
be I don't suspect in can survive in the future.
Apple has elected to leave web development to the open-source. I would suspect
they only possible way Apple can compete in the
to help out the community even more. I have a couple of
ideas about that...
In the meantime, while we wait for the apocalypse, whoever wants to keep
making apps with Java and WebObjects is welcome to hang around.
ms
On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Ken Foust wrote:
From the outside looking
I have not seen a response form Mike Schrag and would hold most comments until
he responds.
But what do you think of CocoaWO now
My opinion Apple needs to incorporate and brilliant enterprise web dev app tied
to Cocoa.
On Oct 21, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
Couldn't we just use
be here
developing WebObjects enterprise apps in Java 9 on Mac OS XI Cobra ;-)
-Kieran
On Oct 21, 2010, at 12:32 PM, Ken Foust wrote:
I have not seen a response form Mike Schrag and would hold most comments
until he responds.
But what do you think of CocoaWO now
My opinion Apple
When I tried to create a new Wonder Rest application. I did not get that
option just a wonder application option
Plus H2 would not let me put a value under prototypes
any direction welcomed
thank you
On Jun 8, 2012, at 10:34 AM, webobjects-dev-requ...@lists.apple.com wrote:
Send
Hi from Catapult Consulting:
We have an immediate need:
OS X desktop
ObjC
some java/EOF
Long term contract. REMOTE !! From your home office
40 hrs per wk
Very stable - exciting work
Pls ping me if interested.
ken
425 578 4777
fou...@me.com
30 matches
Mail list logo
