Hello,
Andreas Mantke wrote:
I changed the field, in which the contributor choose the license, from
drop down to
radio format. I added also a warning text to the description of the field:
http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/stories/1848120/
A multi-choices list would be better.
Some
Hi Olivier, *,
Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 12:37:13 schrieb Olivier R.:
Hello,
Andreas Mantke wrote:
I changed the field, in which the contributor choose the license, from
drop down to
radio format. I added also a warning text to the description of the
field:
Andreas Mantke:
Am Montag, 27. Juni 2011, 19:02:42 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
For usability, I'd prefer not to have a default here. Otherwise, people
may overlook the field and it might well happen that someone uploads an
extension that gets tagged as GPL but actually has (within the OXT
Le 2011-07-03 08:45, Andreas Mantke a écrit :
Hi Andrea, *,
Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 14:13:56 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Andreas Mantke:
Am Montag, 27. Juni 2011, 19:02:42 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
For usability, I'd prefer not to have a default here. Otherwise, people
may overlook the field
Hi Marc, *,
Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 16:57:32 schrieb Marc Paré:
(...)
Suggestion:
Could we order the list in the preference that we would prefer? If some
submitters are unsure of the licence they may then adopt the licence
listed at the top of this list. We could then have the least
Andreas,
I think indeed the SC is rather unsure whether we should allow proprietary
extensions. Could you please disable this option at least for the moment?
Thank you,
Charles.
Le 3 juil. 2011, 5:41 PM, Andreas Mantke ma...@gmx.de a écrit :
Hi Marc, *,
Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 16:57:32
Hello Andreas,
2011/7/3 Andreas Mantke ma...@gmx.de
Hi Charles, *,
Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 18:24:37 schrieb Charles-H. Schulz:
Andreas,
I think indeed the SC is rather unsure whether we should allow
proprietary
extensions. Could you please disable this option at least for the
Le 2011-07-03 11:40, Andreas Mantke a écrit :
Hi Marc, *,
Am Sonntag, 3. Juli 2011, 16:57:32 schrieb Marc Paré:
(...)
Suggestion:
Could we order the list in the preference that we would prefer? If some
submitters are unsure of the licence they may then adopt the licence
listed at the top of
On 7/3/11 11:01 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
I would vote not to reposit (if that is indeed a word) proprietary
extensions and templates etc. Let's keep everything as open as possible.
We can list proprietary extensions perhaps on a separate page. This
would still offer our users a full complement of
On 07/03/2011 02:40 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 7/3/11 11:01 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
I would vote not to reposit (if that is indeed a word) proprietary
extensions and templates etc. Let's keep everything as open as possible.
We can list proprietary extensions perhaps on a separate page. This
On 7/4/11 12:09 AM, C. Olofson wrote:
The reason I say this is that non-free software is not anathema to F/OSS.
Of course not, but I would be very careful because we can alienate FSF
and other TDF supporters.
--
Italo Vignoli
italo.vign...@gmail.com
mobile +39.348.5653829
VoIP
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.comwrote:
On 7/4/11 12:09 AM, C. Olofson wrote:
The reason I say this is that non-free software is not anathema to F/OSS.
Of course not, but I would be very careful because we can alienate FSF and
other TDF supporters.
By
12 matches
Mail list logo
