Re: [libreoffice-website] LibreOffice-Extensions-Template-Website
Hi Christian, *, Am Freitag, 24. Juni 2011, 02:35:09 schrieb Christian Lohmaier: Hi Andreas, *, On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Andreas Mantke ma...@gmx.de wrote: The new site is currently available at http://kermit.documentfoundation.org:9089/LibreOffice-Extensions-and-Temp lates/ There is currently no content inside this new site (no extensions or templates) and only a placeholder home page. There is a dummy-entry now and that makes me complain loudly: http://kermit.documentfoundation.org:9089/LibreOffice-Extensions-and-Templa tes/libreoffice-extensions-center/test-2 * No Licence specified → This absolutely must be mandatory for the repo! License is hidden in the read more for the specific release, but not right in front. * Same for Author/Provider/Publisher I will look in this later. If you have license by release, make it part of the table on the description page please. And also provide it on the search results page. This is very relevant information after all. Screenshots are free-form editable in the description text? (you definitely need to be able to provide screenshots/a logo) This is posible. I added a logo and a screenshot and had to look into it later, why the screenshot is not displayed yet. And the self-certification points are very, very vague. What is the reason behind it? Why have them at all? It is the default of Plone Software Center yet. We can change the categories. I want to discuss this here. The developer of the extension surely follows his own coding standards → checked The extension works on his own computer, he can install and uninstall → checked End-user documentation? Heck my extension is so simple it doesn't need documentation :-) I showed this list here to engage you (and otheres) to provide better categories ;-) Unit Tests? What user will know what that is supposed to mean... Internationalized... Probably means UI is available in the following languages... for most part, no real i18n... There is no description about the categories available. We had to define our own categories and describe them. So there' no relevant info for the end-user IMHO. That's what we should improve together. Regards, Andreas -- ## Developer LibreOffice ## Freie Office-Suite für Linux, Mac, Windows ## http://LibreOffice.org ## Support the Document Foundation (http://documentfoundation.org) ## Meine Seite: http://www.amantke.de -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-website] Re: planet / hackergotchis ...
Hi guys, I was wondering looking at: http://planet.documentfoundation.org/ cf. http://planet.gnome.org/ Why we don't use hackergotchis - these are IMHO a great way to help people learn other people's faces before they meet them in person, which reduces the cognitive load at conferences, and helps increase the focus on learning entirely new people's faces there :-) Was it a deliberate to turn that off ? and/or can we have it on again ? Thanks, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] Mumble and OpenMeetings servers
Hi Marc, *, On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com wrote: Le 2011-06-23 13:14, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : [bypassing the certificate warning did not work in german locale, had to switch to C to accept the certificate] Is this with the latest client 1.2.3? No, this is with the client available on Mandriva 2010.2 (mumble 1.2.2) ciao Christian -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] Mumble and OpenMeetings servers
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com wrote: The problem is solved by starting it in C locale environment (LC_ALL=C mumble) - that did let me pass the certificate validation check (i.e. it accepted the yes) and I could login. After that, it works in german langauge as well. And in case this is unclear - the after that it works means connecting to the server then works, as the certificate-decision is remembered. Accepting certificates for other servers probably still won't work in German locale. But accpeting the certificate in C locale is an easy workaround (but you need to know about it of course) ciao Christian -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: planet / hackergotchis ...
Michael Meeks wrote: Was it a deliberate to turn that off ? and/or can we have it on again ? Sure - but not mandatory please. Also, maybe someone has a nice idea wrt. the style, e.g. shadow, fuzziness, other effects (bonus for a gimp script); or artificial (like http://planet.freedesktop.org/)? Having it somewhat homogeneous is a plus, in my mind. Cheers, -- Thorsten -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] Fwd: Libre means 'free'
Hi Flo, *, On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote: Hi, forwarding this remark, maybe someone wants to have a look? changed to ...free (in the sense of freedom or liberty)... ciao Christian -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-website] right hand side of wrapped paragraphs hidden - any solutions other than BR tags?
https://dvd.north-america.libreofficebox.org/home/en/;
I found the part of the CSS that causes the right side of the page to be
hidden.
Why this hiddenoption is needed.
Couldthere could be some sort of auto wrap option somewhere that will wrap the text instead of hiding it.
I wondered about that. The wrapping works, but it leaves off a lot of text on
the right hand side of the paragraph.
#Layout {
width: 860px;
background: #fff url(../images/bg-sidebar.png) no-repeat top left;
clear: both;
overflow: hidden;
margin: 0px auto;
padding: 15px 15px 15px 15px;
}
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] right hand side of wrapped paragraphs hidden - any solutions other than BR tags?
Hi *, On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:37 PM, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: https://dvd.north-america.libreofficebox.org/home/en/; I found the part of the CSS that causes the right side of the page to be hidden. Why this hiddenoption is needed. a) You *must not* use div id=Layout in your html, there is already one div with that ID as part of the default layout, and you cannot have two elements with the same ID in html, this is not valid. Same for the other divs you did duplicate (BgContainer, Container, the Header) b) And you have an additional div class=typography, this again is autogenerated, and is set to the full width of the page. When you have additional elements on the left, then it doesn't fit anymore. So the problem is you're misusing predefined/special css styles and have hard formatting in your html. Furthermore it abuses tables for layout. Tables don't make autoflow easier at all. Couldthere could be some sort of auto wrap option somewhere that will wrap the text instead of hiding it. No, as you explicitly tell it to not do that. The html contains manual width specification of 784 pixel So clean up the HTML - what you try to do is to fit the content within the content, and that doesn't work. ciao Christian -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] [PING -- Florian] Gmane not working
Le 2011-06-15 14:03, Marc Paré a écrit : Just wondering if Florian could contact the Gmane people and ask them to review their settings for Gmane. Most of the mail lists are readable and the messages are coming through BUT on most people cannot send a new post, cannot answer a post. This should be fixed soon as the Gmane option of communication with the mailing lists are not really of any use to people who would like to contribute. Cheers Marc Hi Florian -- Gmane is still not working. Could someone look into this. None of the global mailists are working. Cheers Marc -- Marc Paré http://www.parEntreprise.com -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] right hand side of wrapped paragraphs hidden - any solutions other than BR tags?
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 17:04 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi *, On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:37 PM, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: https://dvd.north-america.libreofficebox.org/home/en/; I found the part of the CSS that causes the right side of the page to be hidden. Why this hiddenoption is needed. a) You *must not* use div id=Layout in your html, there is already one div with that ID as part of the default layout, and you cannot have two elements with the same ID in html, this is not valid. Same for the other divs you did duplicate (BgContainer, Container, the Header) b) And you have an additional div class=typography, this again is autogenerated, and is set to the full width of the page. When you have additional elements on the left, then it doesn't fit anymore. So the problem is you're misusing predefined/special css styles and have hard formatting in your html. Well, when the original HTML files where made they weren't in the CMS system so there was no misuse of anything, per so. Furthermore it abuses tables for layout. Tables don't make autoflow easier at all. Couldthere could be some sort of auto wrap option somewhere that will wrap the text instead of hiding it. No, as you explicitly tell it to not do that. The html contains manual width specification of 784 pixel So clean up the HTML - what you try to do is to fit the content within the content, and that doesn't work. Agreed - and that is about to begin - but still moving files into different directory structure at the moment. (will be done sometime tomorrow, maybe tonight) @Tim - this is what I was talking about needing to do some transformations on the HTML prior to cutting it into the CMS system. @Christian. Your explanation, or description, of some of the pre-defined elements is a big help actually. Thanks much, //drew -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] right hand side of wrapped paragraphs hidden - any solutions other than BR tags?
On 06/24/2011 11:04 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi *, On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:37 PM, webmaster for Kracked Press Productionswebmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: https://dvd.north-america.libreofficebox.org/home/en/; I found the part of the CSS that causes the right side of the page to be hidden. Why this hiddenoption is needed. a) You *must not* usediv id=Layout in your html, there is already one div with that ID as part of the default layout, and you cannot have two elements with the same ID in html, this is not valid. Same for the other divs you did duplicate (BgContainer, Container, the Header) b) And you have an additional div class=typography, this again is autogenerated, and is set to the full width of the page. When you have additional elements on the left, then it doesn't fit anymore. So the problem is you're misusing predefined/special css styles and have hard formatting in your html. Furthermore it abuses tables for layout. Tables don't make autoflow easier at all. Couldthere could be some sort of auto wrap option somewhere that will wrap the text instead of hiding it. No, as you explicitly tell it to not do that. The html contains manual width specification of 784 pixel So clean up the HTML - what you try to do is to fit the content within the content, and that doesn't work. ciao Christian I was looking at the layout CSS for the CMS server and was wondering why the wrapped text seems to be hidden on the right hand side of the paragraph. I was wondering if there was a fix that could be used so NA site that is being built on the CMS server, now on the libreoffice-na.us site, so there would not be any hidden text issues. The table work was to deal with some alignment issues, but not it is being rebuilt to the CMS server specs. Is there a way that the right site of the page would auto wrap so there is no hidden text? Drew is doing the work right now, but I will be helping once I finish up some commitments locally. I want the pages to be the best looking pages that can be done using the CMS server CSS. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] right hand side of wrapped paragraphs hidden - any solutions other than BR tags?
Hi Drew, *, On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:26 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 17:04 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:37 PM, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: https://dvd.north-america.libreofficebox.org/home/en/; I found the part of the CSS that causes the right side of the page to be hidden. Why this hiddenoption is needed. a) You *must not* use div id=Layout in your html, there is already one div with that ID as part of the default layout, and you cannot have two elements with the same ID in html, this is not valid. Same for the other divs you did duplicate (BgContainer, Container, the Header) b) And you have an additional div class=typography, this again is autogenerated, and is set to the full width of the page. When you have additional elements on the left, then it doesn't fit anymore. So the problem is you're misusing predefined/special css styles and have hard formatting in your html. Well, when the original HTML files where made they weren't in the CMS system so there was no misuse of anything, per so. Well, let me be more clear: what is stored in the CMS is not the complete body, as this would make it impossible to create the navigation dynamic, to have a common header, footer, etc. What is stored in the CMS is the real content only. But what was added in your sample was the complete body, duplicateing the header and whatnot. It's pretty clear from the structure, that a page that was created by the CMS was taken as a template, but you just did copy too much. For the default page type, only what is wihin the div class=typography is part of the CMS (minus the header (h2)that is also taken from the page automatically) ciao Christian -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] right hand side of wrapped paragraphs hidden - any solutions other than BR tags?
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:31 PM, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: I was looking at the layout CSS for the CMS server and was wondering why the wrapped text seems to be hidden on the right hand side of the paragraph. No. Text is hidden, because the content part in the theme is just defined to be the area in the BgContainer. I was wondering if there was a fix that could be used so NA site that is being built on the CMS server, now on the libreoffice-na.us site, so there would not be any hidden text issues. Yes: Don't force the text/elements to be wider as the available area. Remove your hard formatting. The table work was to deal with some alignment issues, but not it is being rebuilt to the CMS server specs. Trying to do alignment with tables is bad. Better use appropriate css styles on semantic elements. Only use a table when what you have is actually tabular data. Is there a way that the right site of the page would auto wrap so there is no hidden text? Again: If you tell This element is 780pixels wide, but there is only room for 600pixels, you're forcing the text to not wrap. Get rid of your manually defined styles, especially the fixed-width specifications. Start with semantic html, i.e. what the job of the element is, and then work on the layout, not the other way round. I want the pages to be the best looking pages that can be done using the CMS server CSS. Well - you can use your own style=... tags in the html, those are not stripped. And furthermore the CSS is not by the CMS, it was created by us, so when the CSS is lacking/needs some more styles, those can be added of course. But using hard formatting is very, very bad. And don't just create divs because you want to indent a paragraph, just specify that indent on the paragraph for example. Just because the CMS is configured to allow manually specified styles doesn't mean that all manually specified styles make sense. ciao Christian -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] Fwd: Libre means 'free'
Thanks! Christian Lohmaier wrote on 2011-06-24 15.42: changed to ...free (in the sense of freedom or liberty)... -- Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-website] Gmane still not allowing replies to lists since changeover
Hi Florian, all, Ever since the changeover in the mailing lists, I have been unable to post by reply using Gmane to the following lists : - website - documentation - projects - accessibility - marketing - marketing.us - design It is getting rather tiring, and not to mention inconvenient, because it means I have to start a new thread if I want to reply to someone. I was of the understanding that we wouldn't have to resubscribe, and that these problems had been cleared up, but that is certainly not the case for me. Can anyone shed any light please ? Alex -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] Gmane still not allowing replies to lists since changeover
Hi Alex, Alexander Thurgood wrote on 2011-06-24 17.35: It is getting rather tiring, and not to mention inconvenient, because it means I have to start a new thread if I want to reply to someone. I was of the understanding that we wouldn't have to resubscribe, and that these problems had been cleared up, but that is certainly not the case for me. Can anyone shed any light please ? sorry for the inconveniences - this is sadly outside of our direct influence. :( I pinged the GMANE admins again just today, hope they will act soon... Florian -- Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] Gmane still not allowing replies to lists since changeover
Le 2011-06-24 18:09, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Hi Alex, Alexander Thurgood wrote on 2011-06-24 17.35: It is getting rather tiring, and not to mention inconvenient, because it means I have to start a new thread if I want to reply to someone. I was of the understanding that we wouldn't have to resubscribe, and that these problems had been cleared up, but that is certainly not the case for me. Can anyone shed any light please ? sorry for the inconveniences - this is sadly outside of our direct influence. :( I pinged the GMANE admins again just today, hope they will act soon... Florian Hi Alex I had not unsubscribed from the mailing lists as I was monitoring the number of mails per day (just one of my obsessions that I like to keep track of). I had only unsubscribed from one list. I imagine to not having to subscribe back to the mailing list, you could use Nabble until the Gmane is fixed. I know this may mean more work than Gmane, but it would be a temporary fix. I am using the Mailing lists for now and saving all the mail so that it is indexed. I am also looking forward to the fix. Cheers Marc -- Marc Paré http://www.parEntreprise.com -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] Mumble and OpenMeetings servers
Le 2011-06-24 06:16, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com wrote: The problem is solved by starting it in C locale environment (LC_ALL=C mumble) - that did let me pass the certificate validation check (i.e. it accepted the yes) and I could login. After that, it works in german langauge as well. And in case this is unclear - the after that it works means connecting to the server then works, as the certificate-decision is remembered. Accepting certificates for other servers probably still won't work in German locale. But accpeting the certificate in C locale is an easy workaround (but you need to know about it of course) ciao Christian HI Christian, could you pass tis around on the DE lists, if you have not done so already? Re: Mandriva version 1.2.2 -- Hopefully this will disappear with the newer version. I'm on Mageia, I am not sure when the newer 1.2.3 client will be available. Maybe I will give the packager(s) a nudge on this. Cheers Marc -- Marc Paré http://www.parEntreprise.com -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] Fwd: Libre means 'free'
Le 2011-06-24 09:42, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : Hi Flo, *, On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote: Hi, forwarding this remark, maybe someone wants to have a look? changed to ...free (in the sense of freedom or liberty)... ciao Christian Well, in reality, in French and Spanish, it does mean freedom and not free , but, the way that you have put the wording together does make sense for our use. Thanks for doing this. Cheers Marc -- Marc Paré http://www.parEntreprise.com -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] right hand side of wrapped paragraphs hidden - any solutions other than BR tags?
On 06/24/2011 11:46 AM, drew wrote: On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 17:34 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi Drew, *, On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:26 PM, drewd...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 17:04 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:37 PM, webmaster for Kracked Press Productionswebmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: https://dvd.north-america.libreofficebox.org/home/en/; I found the part of the CSS that causes the right side of the page to be hidden. Why this hiddenoption is needed. a) You *must not* usediv id=Layout in your html, there is already one div with that ID as part of the default layout, and you cannot have two elements with the same ID in html, this is not valid. Same for the other divs you did duplicate (BgContainer, Container, the Header) b) And you have an additional div class=typography, this again is autogenerated, and is set to the full width of the page. When you have additional elements on the left, then it doesn't fit anymore. So the problem is you're misusing predefined/special css styles and have hard formatting in your html. Well, when the original HTML files where made they weren't in the CMS system so there was no misuse of anything, per so. Well, let me be more clear: what is stored in the CMS is not the complete body, as this would make it impossible to create the navigation dynamic, to have a common header, footer, etc. What is stored in the CMS is the real content only. But what was added in your sample was the complete body, duplicateing the header and whatnot. thanks for explaining that. It's pretty clear from the structure, that a page that was created by the CMS was taken as a template, but you just did copy too much. Absolutely right, that became very clear when I started looking at this. For the default page type, only what is wihin thediv class=typography is part of the CMS (minus the header (h2)that is also taken from the page automatically) @Tim - I know the page that came back after the fix the other day looks like hell - but no one is going to leave it like that. I maybe should of put a nice looking landing page there, but I figured it was just Ugly for a few days and better to get the files we need to like to moved and rearranged first. //drew I have no problem with ugly with the move to better and then to lovely. What I really was concerned about was that hiding of the right hand side of the text - so the thread was started. I also wondered about some other items that might crop up. Why the vertical navigation instead of the horizontal second or third ones like both LO.org site and the wiki site. The vertical navigation tends to remove needed screen space, as I see it. I never liked them much. Now that we have about 600px width for space, we need to guard as much of it is possible. Actually, for the installs, I added thought adding German might be good, since that is the last language not listed that the US schools teach in my area. Right now the installs on the CMS site shows 3.3.2 and not 3.3.3, so that may need to changed. -- Also I was wondering how the system would compensate for all the shared folders and links so the files will be properly located on the ISO of the DVD? The only one I have seen so far is from Brazil and it looks like they did very little that was similar to what the NA DVD will need. Maybe someone could PM me about how that will work, or point me to the documentation already available. As for the extensions and such that is not currently on our DVD and currently resides in my private extension folders; I was wondering if anyone who is currently working on a CMS site would want these file uploaded to a shared folder so everyone could use them. I still thing LibreOffice need to have their own large extension and template site. The dictionaries now on the NA testing site are many, many, more than listed in the current LO/LO-Planet extension listing. The same with the templates I have in my template folders. LO needs to not have the link for these .oxt files, or archived files, point to a flaky OOo server or any server that is totally pro OOo over LibreOffice. Why should we promote using OOo's server when the files could be on a shared folder of a LibreOffice server/system. So do anyone want 100+ .oxt extension [not dictionaries] uploaded to a shared folder, along with the 1000+ template sample files that are not .oxt files? I most likely have a lot of artwork from free sources that could be uploaded as well. It is up to the groups to say yes or no. If anyone would like a archived file containing the .oxt files, or other stuff, let me know. I would be able to make them available some way, some where, for people to look and see what they are all about. Every extension file that I downloaded from OOo's site has an associated PDF file printed from the download page[s] so people can know what these files are all
Re: [libreoffice-website] right hand side of wrapped paragraphs hidden - any solutions other than BR tags?
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 21:03 -0400, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote: snip @Tim - I know the page that came back after the fix the other day looks like hell - but no one is going to leave it like that. I maybe should of put a nice looking landing page there, but I figured it was just Ugly for a few days and better to get the files we need to like to moved and rearranged first. I have no problem with ugly with the move to better and then to lovely. What I really was concerned about was that hiding of the right hand side of the text - so the thread was started. I also wondered about some other items that might crop up. Why the vertical navigation instead of the horizontal second or third ones like both LO.org site and the wiki site. Different theme.. I just chanted that - Look at the site right now: http://dvd.north-america.libreofficebox.org The vertical navigation tends to remove needed screen space, as I see it. I never liked them much. Now that we have about 600px width for space, we need to guard as much of it is possible. Right - I tend to agree, so maybe we need to make our own theme, again, or just convince others to let us Actually, for the installs, I added thought adding German might be good, since that is the last language not listed that the US schools teach in my area. Uh - I would be hard sell on that - not impossible, but a very very hard sell. I would much prefer to finish what we started without changing the target at this point, for this 21 day period - let's keep very focused and get this done, well. Right now the installs on the CMS site shows 3.3.2 and not 3.3.3, so that may need to changed. Old files Tim, the HTML files there having been sitting dormant for a couple of months. Like I said the reason for a hard date this time was so that we don't stall, again. (yes I know I'm talking about and to myself maybe) -- Also I was wondering how the system would compensate for all the shared folders and links so the files will be properly located on the ISO of the DVD? The only one I have seen so far is from Brazil and it looks like they did very little that was similar to what the NA DVD will need. Right and it appears to me that they also did not use the CMS to produce the .iso, only for distribution, so far. But there is a question there I've been running through my mind today also and I suppose should be taken up on the projects list. Maybe someone could PM me about how that will work, or point me to the documentation already available. We need to talk about on, or I should say: I thought we all agreed to use the projects list to discuss libreofficebox issues. As for the extensions and such that is not currently on our DVD and currently resides in my private extension folders; Please move this question to a different email thread, maybe with a subject line about the upcoming extension/template site. //drew -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] Fwd: Libre means 'free'
Le 2011-06-24 21:48, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : Hi Marc, *, On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Marc Parém...@marcpare.com wrote: Le 2011-06-24 09:42, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.orgwrote: forwarding this remark, maybe someone wants to have a look? changed to ...free (in the sense of freedom or liberty)... Well, in reality, in French and Spanish, it does mean freedom and not free , Nah, freedom as in the noun, no. that would be liberté, wouldn't it? Je suis libre, j'ai la liberté de faire ce que me plait. I am free, I have the freedom to do what I like. (I'm free to choose, as opposed that I'm getting something for free, i.e. without having to pay) Do you disagree? ciao Christian Yes as you say: it does mean free in English but as freedom in English, not as the word free of charge which is gratuit. In this case you are using the adverb libre and its corresponding noun liberté which mean the same = freedom. Anyway, these are all semantics. The fact remains that the way you qualified the free (in the sense of freedom or liberty) is fine for those who are not native to the language which is the what the statement attempts to do. Cheers Marc -- Marc Paré http://www.parEntreprise.com -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] Fwd: Libre means 'free'
Le 2011-06-24 22:45, Marc Paré a écrit : Le 2011-06-24 21:48, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : Hi Marc, *, On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Marc Parém...@marcpare.com wrote: Le 2011-06-24 09:42, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.orgwrote: forwarding this remark, maybe someone wants to have a look? changed to ...free (in the sense of freedom or liberty)... Well, in reality, in French and Spanish, it does mean freedom and not free , Nah, freedom as in the noun, no. that would be liberté, wouldn't it? Je suis libre, j'ai la liberté de faire ce que me plait. I am free, I have the freedom to do what I like. (I'm free to choose, as opposed that I'm getting something for free, i.e. without having to pay) Do you disagree? ciao Christian Yes as you say: it does mean free in English but as freedom in English, not as the word free of charge which is gratuit. In this case you are using the adverb libre and its corresponding noun liberté which mean the same = freedom. Anyway, these are all semantics. The fact remains that the way you qualified the free (in the sense of freedom or liberty) is fine for those who are not native to the language which is the what the statement attempts to do. Cheers Marc Sorry should read: adjective rather than adverb -- Marc Paré http://www.parEntreprise.com -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
