Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [libreoffice-website] ConfCall wiki page broken?

2010-11-05 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi, Manuel Schneider wrote on 2010-11-05 08.01: We use the SVN version of the Wikimedia extensions, last "svn up" ran on November 3rd. does this mean CKeditor is included? Florain -- Florian Effenberger Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
Good morning Christian, Am 04.11.2010 23:17, schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol: And does it make any difference when you use http:// instead of https:// Yes, with http:// there is a captcha question in ie8.0. The same procedure. Someone must test it as author. Noted - thanks a lot - for de. p

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread Volker Merschmann
Moin, 2010/11/5 klaus-jürgen weghorn ol : > Good morning Christian, > Am 04.11.2010 23:17, schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol: >>> >>> And does it make any difference when you use >>> http:// instead of https:// >> >> Yes, with http:// there is a captcha question in ie8.0. >>> The same procedure

Re: [libreoffice-website] i10n or i18n

2010-11-05 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Hi Michael, 2010.11.05 07:28, Michael Wheatland rašė: Has anyone noticed that the mailing list nickname for Internationalisation is i10n instead of i18n? wrong, it's L10n (L-ten-N, for localization). The name is derived from the phonetic pronounciation of Intern-EIGHTEEN-alisatioN hence i18n.

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
Am 05.11.2010 09:32, schrieb Volker Merschmann: Moin, 2010/11/5 klaus-jürgen weghorn ol: Good morning Christian, Am 04.11.2010 23:17, schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol: And does it make any difference when you use http:// instead of https:// Yes, with http:// there is a captcha question in ie

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread Michael Wheatland
I don't speak German, but shouldn't it read: Sie haben gerade die Hintertür des CMS. Jetzt können Sie sich als jemand anderes mit dem untenstehenden Formular anmelden und einige Schäden. -- E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available a

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread Volker Merschmann
Hi Michael, 2010/11/5 Michael Wheatland : > I don't speak German, but shouldn't it read: > > Sie haben gerade die Hintertür des CMS. > Jetzt können Sie sich als jemand anderes mit dem untenstehenden Formular > anmelden und einige Schäden. > No, it's not the backdoor. The system recognizes that som

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread Michael Wheatland
:) Just a joke. On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Volker Merschmann wrote: > Hi Michael, > > 2010/11/5 Michael Wheatland : > > I don't speak German, but shouldn't it read: > > > > Sie haben gerade die Hintertür des CMS. > > Jetzt können Sie sich als jemand anderes mit dem untenstehenden Formular >

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread Erich Christian
Hi K-J, Am 05.11.2010 09:47, schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol: >>> When I try do get in the cms (http://www.test.libreoffice.org/admin) >>> I get >>> the following message: >>> "Leider dürfen Sie diesen Teil des CMS nicht aufrufen. Wenn Sie sich als >>> jemand anderes einloggen wollen, benutzen Sie

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Klaus-Jürgen, *, On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:28 AM, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote: > Good morning Christian, > Am 04.11.2010 23:17, schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol: >> >> +1 > > When I try do get in the cms (http://www.test.libreoffice.org/admin) I get > the following message: > "Leider dürfen Si

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Volker, *, On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Volker Merschmann wrote: > 2010/11/5 klaus-jürgen weghorn ol : >> > Try http://www.de.test.libreoffice.org/admin (the prefixed www is optional) ciao Christian -- E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List arc

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Michael, On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Michael Wheatland wrote: > I don't speak German, but shouldn't it read: > > Sie haben gerade die Hintertür des CMS. > Jetzt können Sie sich als jemand anderes mit dem untenstehenden Formular > anmelden und einige Schäden. If you don't speak German, the

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread Graham Lauder
On Friday 05 Nov 2010 10:17:50 Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi *, > > the silverstripe cms is installed and ready to be filled with content. > > Due to the move of the mailinglist archives that is still pending, it > is not at the final URL though, but at > http://test.libreoffice.org (this also g

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread drew
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 22:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi *, > > the silverstripe cms is installed and ready to be filled with content. That is a joke you are pulling right? -- E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available a

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread Christian Lohmaier
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:10 PM, drew wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 22:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> >> the silverstripe cms is installed and ready to be filled with content. > > That is a joke you are pulling right? SC decided to start with Silverstripe, we waited for the server to be a

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread drew
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 23:25 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote: > Christian Lohmaier schrieb: > >[...] > > > > What would the preferred hostname be? artwork or branding? or is it > > meant to all be within the marketing project? > > > > I thought there might already exist some kind of structure discuss

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread drew
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 14:15 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:10 PM, drew wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 22:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >> > >> the silverstripe cms is installed and ready to be filled with content. > > > > That is a joke you are pulling right?

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread Christian Lohmaier
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:21 PM, drew wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 23:25 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote: >> Christian Lohmaier schrieb: >> >[...] >> > >> > What would the preferred hostname be? artwork or branding? or is it >> > meant to all be within the marketing project? >> >> I thought there m

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread Christian Lohmaier
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:24 PM, drew wrote: > On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 14:15 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:10 PM, drew wrote: >> > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 22:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> >> >> >> the silverstripe cms is installed and ready to be filled with con

Re: [libreoffice-website] Interesting Idea for community Integration

2010-11-05 Thread drew
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 13:34 +0930, Michael Wheatland wrote: > The Ubuntu Community has suggested what is called a 'We Menu' which > adds a community aspect to the OS. > Might be an idea for LibreOffice? > > http://wiki.ubuntu.com/WeMenu > I agree there is good, possibly, stuff- for a good part o

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread drew
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 14:41 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:24 PM, drew wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 14:15 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:10 PM, drew wrote: > >> > On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 22:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >> >>

[libreoffice-website] Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread Dr. Bernhard Dippold
Hi Christian, Drew, would you *please* stop the way of personal insulting each other? We're here to work on LibreOffice, not to use any minimal chance to express negative feelings against each other. Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:21 PM, drew wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-11-04

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
Hi Michael, Am 05.11.2010 09:57, schrieb Michael Wheatland: I don't speak German, but shouldn't it read: Sie haben gerade die Hintertür des CMS. Jetzt können Sie sich als jemand anderes mit dem untenstehenden Formular anmelden und einige Schäden. You got me. I'm an undercover agent of OOo and i

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread drew
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 14:58 +0100, Dr. Bernhard Dippold wrote: > Drew - do you really think this helps ? No I'm sure it doesn't. -- E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/ All messa

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread Michael Wheatland
Drew, The steering committee has given the go ahead for SilverStripe to replace the static HTML pages so that there is some kind of management and permissions over the system, beyond that SilverStripe cannot be extended far. An expectation from the Steering Committee was that Drupal will replace Si

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Michael, *, On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Michael Wheatland wrote: > Drew, > [...] beyond that SilverStripe cannot be extended far. That is not true, but doesn't matter in this case. > An expectation from the Steering Committee was that Drupal will > replace Silverstripe within 3-6 months,

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new=?

2010-11-05 Thread Nino Novak
On Friday 05 November 2010 14:58, Dr. Bernhard Dippold wrote: > We're here to work on LibreOffice +1 Nino -- E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/ All messages you send to this list

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [libreoffice-website] ConfCall wiki page broken?

2010-11-05 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi Manuel, first of all, thanks for all the time you invest, that's really much appreciated! Sorry for all the discussions and the burden we put on you. ;) Manuel Schneider wrote on 2010-11-05 09.16: I've never heard of CKEditor before, so I had to check. It is not in the SVN. But Google te

Re: [libreoffice-website] Interesting Idea for community Integration

2010-11-05 Thread Benjamin Horst
On Nov 5, 2010, at 9:41 AM, drew wrote: > On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 13:34 +0930, Michael Wheatland wrote: >> The Ubuntu Community has suggested what is called a 'We Menu' which >> adds a community aspect to the OS. >> Might be an idea for LibreOffice? >> >> http://wiki.ubuntu.com/WeMenu >> > > I a

[libreoffice-website] Re: Interesting Idea for community Integration

2010-11-05 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2010-11-05 09:41, drew a écrit : On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 13:34 +0930, Michael Wheatland wrote: The Ubuntu Community has suggested what is called a 'We Menu' which adds a community aspect to the OS. Might be an idea for LibreOffice? http://wiki.ubuntu.com/WeMenu I agree there is good, possib

[libreoffice-website] Re: Interesting Idea for community Integration

2010-11-05 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2010-11-05 12:13, Benjamin Horst a écrit : On Nov 5, 2010, at 9:41 AM, drew wrote: On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 13:34 +0930, Michael Wheatland wrote: The Ubuntu Community has suggested what is called a 'We Menu' which adds a community aspect to the OS. Might be an idea for LibreOffice? http://wi

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [libreoffice-website] ConfCall wiki page broken?

2010-11-05 Thread Nino Novak
Hi, On Friday 05 November 2010 17:05, Florian Effenberger wrote: > I'm happy to hear other opinions, but IMHO we *NEED* a WYSIWYG > editor. Many users will be very uncomfortable otherwise, so I'd even > take the risk of slightly defective pages in favor of WYSIWYG. I'd like to argue with Manuel

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: Interesting Idea for community Integration

2010-11-05 Thread Benjamin Horst
On Nov 5, 2010, at 12:32 PM, Marc Paré wrote: >>> On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 13:34 +0930, Michael Wheatland wrote: The Ubuntu Community has suggested what is called a 'We Menu' which adds a community aspect to the OS. Might be an idea for LibreOffice? http://wiki.ubuntu.com/We

Re: [libreoffice-website] ConfCall wiki page broken?

2010-11-05 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2010-11-05 14:59, Nino Novak a écrit : Hi, On Friday 05 November 2010 17:05, Florian Effenberger wrote: I'm happy to hear other opinions, but IMHO we *NEED* a WYSIWYG editor. Many users will be very uncomfortable otherwise, so I'd even take the risk of slightly defective pages in favor of W

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [libreoffice-website] ConfCall wiki page broken?

2010-11-05 Thread Manuel Schneider
Hi, Am 05.11.2010 17:05, schrieb Florian Effenberger: Thanks for all your work! Despiste the professional recommendation, that I basically share, I fear we need the WYSIWYG editor. well, we are now starting to chewing arguments already stated over and over again. Let's make it simple: Don

Do we need a WYSIWYG for the wiki ? (was: Re: [libreoffice-website] ConfCall wiki page broken?)

2010-11-05 Thread Stefan Weigel
Hi Florian, *, Am 05.11.2010 17:05, schrieb Florian Effenberger: >> * There is currently no real WYSIWIG editor that works[1]. If there >> were, Wikimedia would use it. > > I'm happy to hear other opinions, but IMHO we *NEED* a WYSIWYG > editor. Many users will be very uncomfortable otherwise, s

[libreoffice-website] Re: Interesting Idea for community Integration

2010-11-05 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2010-11-05 15:28, Benjamin Horst a écrit : Nice work! I like this. As you say in your "Web Integration" section, the more active user become the more they will stick with OOo/LibO. Allowing our user base to join in one way or another gives them a sense of belonging. As to our TDF/LibO memb

Re: [libreoffice-website] ConfCall wiki page broken?

2010-11-05 Thread Nino Novak
On Friday 05 November 2010 20:27, Marc Paré wrote: > I would not go to Wiki-markup. Please read Manuals reply. It's not about supposed potential users but actual contributors. They predominantly seem to switch off the editor. So the editor should be disabled until a fixed version is found/ins

Re: [libreoffice-website] ConfCall wiki page broken?

2010-11-05 Thread Stefan Weigel
Hi Marc, Am 05.11.2010 20:27, schrieb Marc Paré: > I would vote to find a working WYSIWYG editor. Voting for finding something, that does not exist, seems not very wise to me. :-) We´ve been told that there is currently no real WYSIWIG editor that works. I think, this is hard to beleive. But th

Re: [libreoffice-website] The "real thing" is available (CMS on the new server ready for use)

2010-11-05 Thread Graham Lauder
On Saturday 06 Nov 2010 03:03:51 klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Am 05.11.2010 09:57, schrieb Michael Wheatland: > > I don't speak German, but shouldn't it read: > > > > Sie haben gerade die Hintertür des CMS. > > Jetzt können Sie sich als jemand anderes mit dem untenstehenden Fo

Re: Do we need a WYSIWYG for the wiki ? (was: Re: [libreoffice-website] ConfCall wiki page broken?)

2010-11-05 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi all! The latest changes in the wiki made me a bit inefficient, so I both re-enabled the editor and also would like to add my thoughts here. Am Freitag, den 05.11.2010, 20:46 +0100 schrieb Stefan Weigel: > Hi Florian, *, > > Am 05.11.2010 17:05, schrieb Florian Effenberger: > > >> * There is

[libreoffice-website] Re: ConfCall wiki page broken?

2010-11-05 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2010-11-05 16:04, Nino Novak a écrit : On Friday 05 November 2010 20:27, Marc Paré wrote: I would not go to Wiki-markup. Please read Manuals reply. It's not about supposed potential users but actual contributors. They predominantly seem to switch off the editor. So the editor should be d

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: ConfCall wiki page broken?

2010-11-05 Thread Nino Novak
On Friday 05 November 2010 22:19, Marc Paré wrote: > Le 2010-11-05 16:04, Nino Novak a écrit : > > On Friday 05 November 2010 20:27, Marc Paré wrote: > >> I would not go to Wiki-markup. > > > > Please read Manuals reply. > > > > It's not about supposed potential users but actual contributors. > > T

Re: Do we need a WYSIWYG for the wiki ? (was: Re: [libreoffice-website] ConfCall wiki page broken?)

2010-11-05 Thread Nino Novak
Christoph, while I see your arguments, please try to see the problems with messed up pages. So you save minutes to have better formatted tables while imposing hours of work to others who have to fix broken pages. (I'm exaggerating a bit, I know, but please see the point I want to make.) As

Re: Do we need a WYSIWYG for the wiki ? (was: Re: [libreoffice-website] ConfCall wiki page broken?)

2010-11-05 Thread Volker Merschmann
Hi, 2010/11/5 Stefan Weigel : > I personally would never use the WYSIWYG editor. I consider myself > as an average skilled user. > > Do other users need one or ask for one? I don´t know. > > However, I see Wikipedia without WYSIWYG and most Wikipedia authors > are definitely far away from being a

Re: Do we need a WYSIWYG for the wiki ? (was: Re: [libreoffice-website] ConfCall wiki page broken?)

2010-11-05 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Nino! Am Freitag, den 05.11.2010, 22:50 +0100 schrieb Nino Novak: > Christoph, > > while I see your arguments, please try to see the problems with messed > up pages. I never messed up a page in the OpenOffice.org Wiki by using the rich-text editor. So why? :-) > So you save minutes to have

Re: Do we need a WYSIWYG for the wiki ? (was: Re: [libreoffice-website] ConfCall wiki page broken?)

2010-11-05 Thread Volker Merschmann
Hi, 2010/11/5 Christoph Noack : > Am Freitag, den 05.11.2010, 22:50 +0100 schrieb Nino Novak: > Sorry, I don't see a valid point. Volker referred to Manuel in a > previous mail "misuse of the so-called FCKEditor can lead to these > mistakes". So it ends up being technological imperfection, nothing

Re: Do we need a WYSIWYG for the wiki ? (was: Re: [libreoffice-website] ConfCall wiki page broken?)

2010-11-05 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Volker! Am Freitag, den 05.11.2010, 23:14 +0100 schrieb Volker Merschmann: > Sorry Christoph, this was just my/our first guess that morning. > It was a fault by somebody who copied text from the preview to the > editor, see Stefan Weigels Mail on the list. Thanks for the hint ... but this mak

Re: Do we need a WYSIWYG for the wiki ? (was: Re: [libreoffice-website] ConfCall wiki page broken?)

2010-11-05 Thread Michael Wheatland
I love WYSIWYG editors, I will make that clear from the start. I don't know why, but I have real issues trying to understand wiki input format. I have noticed that when pasting into FCKEditor it only allows 'text' paste which may have been the reason you started seeing HTML tags as the person was p

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: Interesting Idea for community Integration

2010-11-05 Thread Michael Wheatland
This is brilliant progress, and I would love to see this integrated into LibO, but first we need to develop the web side of it. I am sure it would be very easy to cobble together an interface in LibO if we had the system already running on the website, it would just need to send some information an

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: Mailing lists

2010-11-05 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Bernhard, hi Michael! Am Donnerstag, den 04.11.2010, 14:49 +0100 schrieb Dr. Bernhard Dippold: > - ... probably forgot something ... Easily referring to posts being (also) available public: I like to provide traceability, so referring to mails or posts is essential for me. At the moment, I man

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: Mailing lists

2010-11-05 Thread Michael Wheatland
Christoph, Here would be good: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Website/Requirements/Mailing_Lists -- E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/ All messages you send to this list will be

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: Mailing lists

2010-11-05 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Christoph, *, On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Christoph Noack wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 04.11.2010, 14:49 +0100 schrieb Dr. Bernhard Dippold: >> - ... probably forgot something ... > > Easily referring to posts being (also) available public: I like to > provide traceability, so referring to

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: Mailing lists

2010-11-05 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Michael, Bernhard, Christian! I added our requirements. I hope I didn't forget any wishes by other people ... Cheers, Christoph Am Samstag, den 06.11.2010, 08:57 +0930 schrieb Michael Wheatland: > Christoph, > Here would be good: > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Website/Requirements/Maili

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: Mailing lists

2010-11-05 Thread Michael Wheatland
Looks brilliant, I am sure we can design something around that. Thanks, Michael Wheatland On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Christoph Noack wrote: > Hi Michael, Bernhard, Christian! > > I added our requirements. I hope I didn't forget any wishes by other > people ... > > Cheers, > Christoph > > A

"Libreoffice" mailing list (was: Re: [libreoffice-website] i10n or i18n)

2010-11-05 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Michael, I also noticed an issue with regard to the freedesktop mailing lists covering development stuff. I already wrote in a PS ... > Is there a reason for the list to be called "[Libreoffice]". > Shouldn't it be "[LibreOffice]" or even "[libreoffice]" (to match the > libo.org lists)? Where

[libreoffice-website] LibO Idea Handling (was: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [tdf-discuss] priorising feature-requests [was: LO mobile phone version])

2010-11-05 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Ian, all! Before I start - I cross-post this mail to both disc...@tdf and webs...@libo, because I think it could be helpful to collect some requirements concerning the future web infrastructure. For answers, please use the original thread at disc...@tdf. Thanks! The issue: There has been a pro

[libreoffice-website] Re: ConfCall wiki page broken?

2010-11-05 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2010-11-05 17:32, Nino Novak a écrit : On Friday 05 November 2010 22:19, Marc Paré wrote: Le 2010-11-05 16:04, Nino Novak a écrit : On Friday 05 November 2010 20:27, Marc Paré wrote: I would not go to Wiki-markup. Please read Manuals reply. It's not about supposed potential users but act

[libreoffice-website] Drupal CMS development site live (The Realer Thing)

2010-11-05 Thread Michael Wheatland
As you all know, Drupal is being developed in line with the Steering Committee decision to have Drupal implemented within 6 months (Assuming it is ready). The Drupal LibreOffice Development site is now at (Drumroll) www.libreofficeaustralia.org Sorry about the localisation, but I would love t

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: ConfCall wiki page broken?

2010-11-05 Thread Michael Wheatland
Sorry to jump in here, but I really dislike working with wiki markup, as I am sure a lot of others are too. Correct me if I am wrong but this problem was catalysed by someone copying and pasting markup as text inside the WYSIWYG editor. This will always happen no matter what WYSIWYG editor you use,

Re: [libreoffice-website] LibO Idea Handling (was: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [tdf-discuss] priorising feature-requests [was: LO mobile phone version])

2010-11-05 Thread Michael Wheatland
Christoph, Ian, All, This will without a doubt be included in the Drupal website development. The Wiki page can be found here: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Website/Drupal/brainstorm No work has been started on the system yet, but we need specifications in the wiki in order to design the syst

[libreoffice-website] Re: LibO Idea Handling

2010-11-05 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2010-11-05 22:46, Michael Wheatland a écrit : Christoph, Ian, All, This will without a doubt be included in the Drupal website development. The Wiki page can be found here: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Website/Drupal/brainstorm No work has been started on the system yet, but we need spe

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: ConfCall wiki page broken?

2010-11-05 Thread Carlos Jenkins
2010/11/5 Michael Wheatland > Sorry to jump in here, but I really dislike working with wiki markup, > as I am sure a lot of others are too. > Correct me if I am wrong but this problem was catalysed by someone > copying and pasting markup as text inside the WYSIWYG editor. This > will always happe